Tom's Hardware > Forum > General Networking > Network General Discussions > Gigabit performance: Onboard vs. PCI-E NIC

Gigabit performance: Onboard vs. PCI-E NIC

Forum General Networking : Network General Discussions - Gigabit performance: Onboard vs. PCI-E NIC

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

OK, I recently threw a gigabit switch into my network and attached my PCs to it as opposed to directly to my router. Both of my systems have Asus boards with onboard gigabit ethernet (nVidia chipsets).

It's definitely much faster than before, but I found that it's not nearly as fast as I think it should be. When copying 1.2G files from system to system the speed bounces around a fair bit, usually between 130-250Mb/s.

Both systems are XP SP3 with fairly new, recently defragged drives. One thought was that I was running into a disk interface bottleneck. The other was that the onboard NICs aren't as good as one would hope.

Would buying a pair of PCI/PCI-E NICs likely improve performance?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

In your post you said "When copying 1.2G files from system to system the speed bounces around a fair bit, usually between 130-250Mb/s" do you bits or bytes? Maximum transfer speed on a gigabit connection is about 120 mega bytes/sec, not counting in overhead.

Reply to sturm
Tom's Hardware > Forum > General Networking > Network General Discussions > Gigabit performance: Onboard vs. PCI-E NIC
Go to:

There are 661 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them