I have seen people talk as if raid0 gives you a greater chance of losing all your data...why is that? What makes raid0 hard on the disks?
If the chance of failure for 2 disks in raid0 is still the same as one of the disks failing individually, that is FINE by me! I've used single disk setups all my life and have never had one fail, ever.
So is the simple idea that if you have 2 disks instead of one, you have twice the chance of a disk failure?? Is that it? If so I'm not woried and I'm gonna raid0, because I do a lot of HDD read-time limited work. I backup data on portable HDD anyway.
Thanks!
If the chance of failure for 2 disks in raid0 is still the same as one of the disks failing individually, that is FINE by me! I've used single disk setups all my life and have never had one fail, ever.
So is the simple idea that if you have 2 disks instead of one, you have twice the chance of a disk failure?? Is that it? If so I'm not woried and I'm gonna raid0, because I do a lot of HDD read-time limited work. I backup data on portable HDD anyway.
Thanks!