3.61ghz is the new 4.1ghz

Way back in the old P4 days it was 4.1ghz, google thg for their article with some kind of super cooling back in 2003? The systems i sold in late 2003 and early 2004 where the Warpedsystems Xtreme 4.1 - based on the 560j with the thermalright xp-90- 4.08ghz shipped - max oc 4.25ghz fsb 920+ 2-2-2-5 corsair ddr400 - the old days!

My point is the new speed 3.61ghz - the systems run super fast and are super responsive.

The new intel chips run 1.35v-1.42v fsb 1700mhz on the 1333 bus chips (e6750) or fsb 1600mhz on the 1066 with the q6600- 3.6ghz is the new sweet spot!

whether your running a e6750 or q6600 the new speed air cooling is 3.6ghz - tune your systems boy's!


as far as amd goes - i can only hope that one of their "real quad cores" will run 3.6ghz?????

please add your thoughts to this post yes you can run higher but 3.6ghz seems to me to be the new 4.1ghz.


Our new air cooled systems will run 3.6ghz with a quad core! WSZ X4 3.6 Vcore 1.42v p35 chipset.

AMD has their work cut out!


world fastest air cooled computer early 2006 WSZ X2 4.5 intel 965 up 4.6ghz air cooled - back in early 2006:

Nice and clear

you do realize that AMDs quads dont have to run at 3.6ghz to best a 3.6ghz quad for now..., you do realize you were sell an "Warpedsystems Xtreme" pc's with CRT monitors*? whoa thats pretty eXtreme. and you do realize that we know this and we dont care?
*looks to be a CRT but could be an LCD if it is a LCD my apologies.

I find it hard to believe that there are people on this forum who don't know how to use the print screen button.

Uhh, I used the Vista betas from beta 2 to RC2 with firefox...what's the matter with that?

Forgot to mention that I don't really get the point of this thread, I thought THG was able to get the E6750 up to 4.16GHz, so what's with the 3.6 business?

http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/0 [...] yond_4ghz/

I just had to upgrade to Vista, and it is the 1st time I've sued it since it came out (I sampled it then). As much as I hate moving away from XP Pro, and I do know Vista still has bugs to work out, Microsoft has come a lonmg way on fixing things. It's really not *aweful* right now.

One nice thing about Vista is the new snipping tool which allows you to snip the screen or a window and just save it wherever.

I agree Vista isn't nearly as bad as it was and anyone who was around when XP first came out remembers that people had the same complaints about it. As for the OP I agree, CPU's process information much more efficiently than they once did. During the time of the P4 it took 5.2ghz to match the performance of a AMD64 at 2.2ghz. Times have changed.

I agree about the (lack of) screenshot, but I think the point was that with the current FSB/RAM speeds that he's stating it all comes together with the best overall performance at 3.6 instead of at 4.1.

WAY past my innate level of geeknowlege - I've stopped worrying about tweaking for 'absolute' best performance before the 386/dx came along. Now I just overwhelm the user with functionality and stability while keeping the servers running smooth.

Still, I'd like to see some discussion about what his main point seems to be. Is there a true performance improvement overall when you've set the processor speed at X when it's capable of Y, and if so, how come you didn't get better ram so that a native speed of Y is reachable?

FYI - AMD/Intel - who gives a rat's *** anyway? What's the best bang for my buck that won't crap out when the OS makes a system call that wasn't hardwired into the cpu - that's all I care about.

PS... The Ctrl+Alt+PrintScreen Will capture any window that you have in focus NOT the whole screen.. So that is an option too

wow the quote works now!

i will double post -- anyone running faster the 3.6ghz stable and what are your temps???? enough with the print screen thing and amd....... anyone running q6600 air cooled above 3.6ghz??????

anyone running e6750 or e6850 above 3.6ghz please post your results!

thank you!

"75 mph is the new 55 mph...!!" ?

Print Screen button?????? Whats a Print Screen button?

tar pit i would expect better! lol

if anyone is running a e6750, e6850 or q6600 on air cooling above 3.6ghz please add to this thread - if not email the tar pit!

lol!

Yeah...check this thread out http://www.xtremesystems.org/forum [...] p?t=152722

The guy got his Q6600 just over 3.7 GHz on air !!!

The Me references are written by absolute morons. Vista works fine, I've been running the 64bit version from November at home and 32bit in the office.

Have any issue post them and we'll work them out. Once you get use to the interface changes I doubt you'll want go back to XP.

To think all this time i've been cropping things like some kind of "Neanderthal".

No more Ctrl + Y(crop) in Irfanview for me.

For real. thats a time saver thanks.

... it'd be less a shorter answer if you asked "what's good about Windows ME?"

Quick answer to what was wrong with ME, I got to see way, WAY to much BSOD, at one point i considered using it as my desktop, for a laugh. But then the reality of ME's legendary stability struck me and using the BSOD as a desktop was just to depressing.

What? You mean like Vista?

He he ....yeah. Ok...I'm a lemming

to be honest (ill be hated for this) i use 1e7 on both my XP machine and on the vista box. the thing is it save having multiple version of 1 tool clogging things up and if you have FF you still need IE for some sites nd apps. also i hate the way there is no really easy method of opening a new tab like in IE who care if they copied i sure dont

Also i use the x64 version of vista it run all but the oldest of obsolete programs fine

Click View->Tool Bars->Customize and pull the New Window icon up to the tool bar next to the address bar. Done, and done. To make it even better, click Tools ->Options->Tabs and check always show the Tab Bar. Check any additional boxes that meet your preferences. IE is only needed for updates and a very very few sites.


Try learning the program before whining about how bad it is.



FIREFOX RULES

DONT GET ME WRONG FF IS GOOD I HAVE TO USE IT ON MY LINUS SERVER, AND I HAD IT BEFORE IE6, BUT IE7 IS SUCH A FLUID PROGRAM, and it simple to use very little thought is there to distract you from your work. It like to have as little clutter as possible on my PC and two browers isnt needed, esp conisdering tht IE7 is more than good enough.

Oh this was just priceless should be a visa commercial. Edited the message above, clicked submit your reply. Got three messages IE has stopped... Looking for a solution... IE is restarting. Your last web page is lost Priceless.

i really dont care for downloading extension and ****, another eason FF is gay(er) id rather have it working out of the box. i fed up hearing ohto do that just add this or extend that.

Im just saying im using IE at least until the nxt FF, which i will give a fair try.

STOP YELLING AT ME!!!

IE sucks & FF rules, everyone knows this truth.