Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Why more cards available w/ fan than w/ passive heatsink (fanless)?

Why more cards available w/ fan than w/ passive heatsink (fanless)?

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Why more cards available w/ fan than w/ passive heatsink (fanless)?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Ask the community Add a reply
Word :    Username :           
 
frankca   08-23-2007 at 02:10:04 AM

I'm just curious (I hope this is not FAQ)...

 

1) Why more cards available with fan than with passive heatsink (fanless) - fanless should be preferable right? Is it because cards with fan work in most systems?

 

2) How much the different in term of noise between fan vs. fanless? Why the noise level of cards with fan varied between models?

 

-Frank


Message edited by frankca on 08-23-2007 at 02:11:34 AM
Add a reply
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
ausch30   08-23-2007 at 02:31:21 AM
- 0 +

I'm assuming your talking about video cards, first of all most cards released in the last 6-7 years produce too much heat to be cooled passively. If a card is passively cooled the heatsink needs to be very large to be able to remove enough heat from the GPU and some mid to low-end cards use this method for silent PC or HTPC use. There are aftermarket fanless heatsinks available for higher end video cards but these take up 3 or even 4 expansion slots.

The answer to your next question is that passively cooled cards are silent actively cooled cards are not and the difference between noise levels depends on the card and how much heat it produces also if it's factory overclocked and also if it uses the reference cooler.


Message edited by ausch30 on 08-23-2007 at 02:36:05 AM
------------------------------
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
-Aristotle
 Reply to ausch30
Bronze Graphics badge jaguarskx   08-23-2007 at 03:02:59 AM
- 0 +

1. Cost. It is more expensive because you need more metal touching the GPU and RAM to dissipate the heat. In some silent solutions the heatsink isn't even touching the RAM chips.

2. Limited overclocking at best. Since a large heatsink cannot dissipate heat as quickly as an active solution, the video cards are usually sold at stock speeds. Thus enthusiasts will be avoiding those video cards.

3. Too much heat to dissipate. The 2900/8800 series produces too much heat to be passively cooled and gaming enthusiasts are more concerned about performance than a silent card.


Video cards generally use small fans. The hotter the card the faster that small fan must spin. Therefore, the louder it gets.

------------------------------ Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | HD 5850 | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi and Planar PX2611w | WinXP

Peace on Earth by means of the destruction of all life on Earth.
 Reply to jaguarskx
Ask the community Add a reply
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Why more cards available w/ fan than w/ passive heatsink (fanless)?
Go to:

There are 604 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Forum map
Bestofmedia Forum ©
2000-2009 Bestofmedia Group
Page generated in 1.041 seconds
Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Related Topics
See all relatives topics
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
How do I win badges?