Archived from groups: alt.games.resident-evil (
More info?)
On Sat, 15 May 2004 07:42:01 GMT, Bongo <octavalvehandle@earthlink.net>
said:
>I have a theory about the future of RE...
>
>Capcom obviously doesn't intend RE4 to be the last game in the series.
>As of a year ago, Capcom has been in financial trouble. They canceled a
>lot of games in development. Now they need the RE franchise to be
>successful.
>
>Lets think about RE5 for a minute. RE4 can't be the ultimate RE. Capcom
>would be screwing themselves in doing that. They've got to be able to
>top RE4 with the next game. Playstation is what made the series a best
>seller. The combo of RE and Sony have always been a hit.
>
>The descriptions of RE4 make it seem like yet another *side story* than
>the long awaited sequel we've been expecting. Why have they switched the
>concept shown in the RE4 trailers from last year? Could it be that they
>want to to save it for the much more lucrative PS2 market? Why blow your
>best idea on the smaller GC market?
>
>Also this new RE4 seems conceptually simpler than the prior version. In
>the new GC RE4, we see villagers that seem possessed. The old trailer
>showed a concept that could be seen as a progression on this concept. In
>RE5, not only can humans get possessed but also things like dolls and
>mannequins. That could be really scary. By doing this "possessed
>villagers" thing, they are giving themselves room to easily top
>themselves with the next game.
>
>,,,just a theory.
>
>--B O N G O
>
>
>
>
>
Perhaps RE4 is a taste of things to come. This could be the last
mainstream RE game for this generation of consoles.
If RE4 is a success then Capcom know they're on the right track with the
series for the next-gen consoles and produce a game with a tested and
perhaps winning formula.
----
Be a man.....
Be a KLUGMAN!!!!