Guys can you tell me which card is better in terms of raw performance for my nearly extinct AGP 4x system. Please note that the 7600GT is a DDR2 version not DDR3 and its made by Point Of View. Thanks
From what I hear the GDDR3 version is far superior to the DDR2, I was told in another topic to avoid the DDR2 for my AGP - However I am looking for a GPU for my AGP 8X, not sure how much difference that makes.
Earlier on before I posted this, was looking at the charts but I coudn't make it up that's why I created a thread lol. I know 7600GT DDR3 IS faster than x1650Pro but this time around the 7600GT is only ddr2. For example this chart below the 7600GT is faster by 11.8 frames per second, but what about the 7600GT's ddr2 version? Do you know much performance penalty will it lose?
The DDR2 version is TERRIBLE compared to the DDR3 version.
DDR2 7600 GTs run their memory at 7600 GS speeds... MUCH slower.
The amount of memory has very little impact, but the memory speed has a colossal impact in gaming performance.
Do you know much performance penalty will it lose compared to the DDR3 version? Because the DDR2 version is not on the comparison chart and I really need to make up my mind. A 7600GT 256 DDR2 or a X1650Pro 256 DDR3. Thanks
Just for the sake of argument (and believe me, I don't have the answers): What is the system configuration?
This could bring up a multitude of questions:
Will this GPU be bottlenecked by AGP 4x?
Will it be bottlenecked by the CPU?
How much GPU power is needed?
Are either/both of these overkill?
Is it not even worth upgrading?
I think you're addressing the wrong issues.
Message edited by KyleSTL on 08-23-2007 at 10:22:44 PM
I have a P4 1.8Ghz, 768Mb of SDRAM (1*512 and 1*256) a socket 478 mobo (ntel Brookdale i845 chipset) with up to 4x AGP bus, 400Watt power supply, 40Gb IDE HD and a dead Geforce4 4600Ti.
Currently, Im on a GFX that came with it which is Geforce 2 MX 400. lol How crap is that! I was able to play games fluidly with my dead Ti4600. CS:source @ 1280*800 res and I wanted to replace the MX. I don't wanna but a new pc YET. I want to squeeze a bit out of if if you know what I mean.
For power, I think it is sufficient as they are not the most demanding GFX that consumes >100Watt power. And I think its worth of an upgrade from a dead Verto Geforce4 Ti4600.
"I think you're addressing the wrong issues."
Yes I know what I'm doing, its just a simple upgrade
Well, at the end of the thread, they recommended a x1950Pro which is I don't need and I don't wanna spend more, plus it will be bottlenecked by my processor.
Well I've decided to just go ahead with x1650 Pro. Thanks for the help anyways
Message edited by skyline0511 on 08-23-2007 at 11:15:01 PM