Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » 7600GT 256Mb DDR2 AGP vs ATi X1650Pro DDR3
 

7600GT 256Mb DDR2 AGP vs ATi X1650Pro DDR3

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : 7600GT 256Mb DDR2 AGP vs ATi X1650Pro DDR3
 
What You See Is What You Get
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Guys can you tell me which card is better in terms of raw performance for my nearly extinct AGP 4x system. Please note that the 7600GT is a DDR2 version not DDR3 and its made by Point Of View. Thanks

 

http://www.ebuyer.com/UK/product/127243

 

http://www.ebuyer.com/UK/product/127666


Message edited by skyline051 1 on 08-23-2007 at 06:44:42 PM
Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

I'm proud of myself,because i'm from IRAN
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

both are good , check the charts for more info :
http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphics.html


---------------
Q6600@3.0,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,OCZ 4GB DDR2 800 RAM 4-4-4-15,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA X38,SEAGATE 500GB 7200RPM 32MB,TT V1 CPU Cooler,TT ARMOR SILVER ALUMNIUM With 25cm FAN,OCZ MODXSTREAM 900W,LG 2284F 1680x1050
Profile: member
More Information

From what I hear the GDDR3 version is far superior to the DDR2, I was told in another topic to avoid the DDR2 for my AGP - However I am looking for a GPU for my AGP 8X, not sure how much difference that makes.

What You See Is What You Get
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Earlier on before I posted this, was looking at the charts but I coudn't make it up that's why I created a thread lol. I know 7600GT DDR3 IS faster than x1650Pro but this time around the 7600GT is only ddr2. For example this chart below the 7600GT is faster by 11.8 frames per second, but what about the 7600GT's ddr2 version? Do you know much performance penalty will it lose?

 

http://www23.tomshardware.com/grap [...] &chart=286


Message edited by skyline051 1 on 08-23-2007 at 01:19:35 PM
Profile: Forum Master
More Information

The DDR2 version is TERRIBLE compared to the DDR3 version.

DDR2 7600 GTs run their memory at 7600 GS speeds... MUCH slower.
The amount of memory has very little impact, but the memory speed has a colossal impact in gaming performance.

Go DDR3 or nothing if you're getting a 7600 GT.

Profile: addict
More Information

ITS NOT A GT, Its a 7600GS, not a 7600 GT, of course its ddr2, all GT's are ddr3, the GS is going to be slower

Profile: Forum Master
More Information

Some DDR2 cards with 512mb are branded as GTs.

What You See Is What You Get
Profile: journeyman
More Information

starcraftfanatic wrote :

ITS NOT A GT, Its a 7600GS, not a 7600 GT, of course its ddr2, all GT's are ddr3, the GS is going to be slower

 

Lol, I made a mistake. Please ignore the link I have posted above. I will change it now. lol

 

This is the right one

 

7600GT 256Mb DDR2 by Point Of View
http://www.ebuyer.com/UK/product/127243

 

7600GT 256Mb DDR3 by Leadtek - Unfortunately, its out of stock
http://www.ebuyer.com/UK/product/118116

 

Do you know much performance penalty will it lose compared to the DDR3 version? Because the DDR2 version is not on the comparison chart and I really need to make up my mind. A 7600GT 256 DDR2 or a X1650Pro 256 DDR3. Thanks

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by skyline051 1 on 08-23-2007 at 07:00:24 PM
Profile: Forum Master
More Information

The 7600 GT will take a COLOSASAL performance penalty if it's got DDR2.

Get either the DDR3 version of the 7600 GT DDR3. The X1650 PRO isn't nearly as fast as the 7600 GT.

The X1650 XT is about as fast as the 7600 GT DDR3.

What You See Is What You Get
Profile: journeyman
More Information

skyline0511 wrote :


7600GT 256Mb DDR3 by Leadtek - Unfortunately, its out of stock



Come on guys, you still haven't answered my question. lol So which one to choose? 7600GT DDR2? or X1650 Pro DDR3? :bounce:

I'm proud of myself,because i'm from IRAN
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

x1650 pro is better i think because of ddr3 ,


---------------
Q6600@3.0,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,OCZ 4GB DDR2 800 RAM 4-4-4-15,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA X38,SEAGATE 500GB 7200RPM 32MB,TT V1 CPU Cooler,TT ARMOR SILVER ALUMNIUM With 25cm FAN,OCZ MODXSTREAM 900W,LG 2284F 1680x1050
Profile: Forum Master
More Information

NO. The X1650 PRO is NOT better.



I did answer your question:

"The X1650 PRO isn't nearly as fast as the 7600 GT."

I have nothing witty to say.
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Just for the sake of argument (and believe me, I don't have the answers): What is the system configuration?

This could bring up a multitude of questions:
Will this GPU be bottlenecked by AGP 4x?
Will it be bottlenecked by the CPU?
How much GPU power is needed?
Are either/both of these overkill?
Is it not even worth upgrading?

I think you're addressing the wrong issues.


Message edited by KyleSTL on 08-23-2007 at 10:22:44 PM

---------------
Lian-Li PC-7B | XClio Greatpower 550W | P4 3.2 Prescott SL7E5 | Scythe Ninja
2GB DDR400 Corsair VS (4*512) | eVGA nVidia GF 7600GS AGP vmod 1.46/1.91 OCd 740/910
WD 120GB & 250GB PATA & WD 640GB SATA (on PCI SATA card LOL)
WinXP MCE 2004
I have nothing witty to say.
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Just as a reference, skyline, I found another very similar post.

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] 800xt-vivo


---------------
Lian-Li PC-7B | XClio Greatpower 550W | P4 3.2 Prescott SL7E5 | Scythe Ninja
2GB DDR400 Corsair VS (4*512) | eVGA nVidia GF 7600GS AGP vmod 1.46/1.91 OCd 740/910
WD 120GB & 250GB PATA & WD 640GB SATA (on PCI SATA card LOL)
WinXP MCE 2004
What You See Is What You Get
Profile: journeyman
More Information

I have a P4 1.8Ghz, 768Mb of SDRAM (1*512 and 1*256) a socket 478 mobo (ntel Brookdale i845 chipset) with up to 4x AGP bus, 400Watt power supply, 40Gb IDE HD and a dead Geforce4 4600Ti.

Currently, Im on a GFX that came with it which is Geforce 2 MX 400. lol How crap is that! I was able to play games fluidly with my dead Ti4600. CS:source @ 1280*800 res and I wanted to replace the MX. I don't wanna but a new pc YET. I want to squeeze a bit out of if if you know what I mean.

For power, I think it is sufficient as they are not the most demanding GFX that consumes >100Watt power. And I think its worth of an upgrade from a dead Verto Geforce4 Ti4600.

"I think you're addressing the wrong issues."
Yes I know what I'm doing, its just a simple upgrade

What You See Is What You Get
Profile: journeyman
More Information

KyleSTL wrote :

Just as a reference, skyline, I found another very similar post.

 

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] 800xt-vivo

 


Well, at the end of the thread, they recommended a x1950Pro which is I don't need and I don't wanna spend more, plus it will be bottlenecked by my processor.

 

Well I've decided to just go ahead with x1650 Pro. Thanks for the help anyways ;)


Message edited by skyline051 1 on 08-23-2007 at 11:15:01 PM
What You See Is What You Get
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Cleeve wrote :

NO. The X1650 PRO is NOT better.



I did answer your question:

"The X1650 PRO isn't nearly as fast as the 7600 GT."




No you didn't, give me some proof that a 7600GT ddr2 version NOT DDR3 beats a x1650Pro DDR3

Profile: Forum Master
More Information

1.8 GHz?

Wow, that's pretty slow. Definitely don't go higher than a 7600 GT or X1650 XT.

The 7600 GS and X1650 PRO might be a better fit.

Profile: Forum Master
More Information

skyline0511 wrote :

No you didn't, give me some proof that a 7600GT ddr2 version NOT DDR3 beats a x1650Pro DDR3



Yes I did. Read the thread.

And for the record, you didn't ask for proof until right now. You want proof, google some benchmarks.

What You See Is What You Get
Profile: journeyman
More Information