Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » General Discussions » GA-965P-S3 and E6600 won't overclock...
 

GA-965P-S3 and E6600 won't overclock...




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : GA-965P-S3 and E6600 won't overclock...
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

I have an E6600 2.4, GA-965P-SE motherboard, and 2 gigs of corsair pc4200 533.

I've read every how to, searched for several hours on different forums, done everything suggested and I still can't get this thing to overclock.

I set the FSB, set the ram to 2x FSB, disabled all settings that might interfere (including those that shouldn't like TM2) followed several guides (2 specifically for this motherboard) and it still does nothing different when I boot. After I overclock it and save and exit it cuts off for 2-3 seconds like it should, boots right up, but its at the stock speed still. I check it with CPU-Z to double check and sure enough its still 2.4. I've ran out of things to change in the Bios.

The only possible thing I can think of is that my memory frequency needs to be lowered so I have headroom raising the FSB (although from reading about others, they've been able to overclock corsair memory fairly easily). I can't figure out how to do this though. Gigabyte's bios doesn't have an option to lower it and only allows you to raise the voltage or change the timings.

I've gotta be missing something somewhere. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

Post your bios settings.

Profile: stranger
More Information

I'll take some pictures and post them when I get back from playing Golf.

Off the top of my head though here are the vital settings, FSB 270-330 tryed, Memory Frequency is 533 would grows and maintains a 1:1 ratio when upping the FSB. Memory timings = 4-4-4-12.

Every single program designed to regulate the cpu was disabled in the advanced bios settings. PCI freq 100mhz.

I've checked and rechecked everything. Has anyone ever had this problem? Its gotta be something simple.

Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

Ok, I think I see it.

First, are you sure it's GA-965P-SE & not GA-965P-S3?

2nd, you're trying to lower memory frequency? Well, P965 overclocks the cpu & ram at a ratio. Look at the last screenie:

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/m [...] html#sect0

2.00 is 1:1 ratio. So it only goes up. So your ram will always be equal to or higher than FSB.

You ram is holding you back. You can only go up to 266-ish for ram.

1066 / 4 = 266.5 * 9 = ~2.4ghz cpu
266.5 * 2 = 533mhz ram

Sadly, the ram isn't a good overclocker. If you want to go higher, get better ram like crucial ballistix for about $65 after rebate at newegg.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Yeah its an S3 (typo).

So i was right then. My ram is topping out at 533 and simply won't overclock anymore so that is holding everything back?

I don't wanta spend alot more. This DDR2 800 ram http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820161229 is 54 bucks for 2 gigs and several of the reviews say they succesfully overclocked it to 1000mhz. Seems like cheap reliable ram for my amateur purposes.

Let me make sure I have this straight: If I got DDR2 800 ram, it would run at 533 if my FSB is 266, so I'd in theory be able to OC the e6600 up to at least the stock frequency of my ram? So if I put it at FSB 330 it should successfully overclock and my memory would be at 660 mhz with a memory mulplier of 2 (1:1 ratio).

I'm kinda confused about that. Why do people by higher mhz ram if there processor's FSB only runs it at 533 etc. Does everyone have to overclock there FSB or at least up there memory mulplier on a stock 266mhzx9 system.

Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

This is guaranteed to go as high as & beyond 1000mhz:

 

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820146565

 

After rebate, it's about the same price as most every ram.

 

Any ddr2 800 is better than ddr2 533, except for kingston valueram which uses the best chips like the expensive ram.

 

Correct. P965/P35/X38/X48(will be out) overclocks cpu & ram at a ratio. It largely depends on the ram. So in reviews, expensive ram is always used for overclocking.

 

In theory:

 

9 x 400 = 3.6 ghz cpu
400 x 2 = 800 mhz ram

 

Unlikely. Unless your cpu cooler & case cooling is above average.

 

More realistic:

 

8 x 400 = 3.2
400 x 2 = 800

 

That's doable on stock cooling.

 

The reason there are faster ram is that Intel chipsets aren't the only in the world. There are nvidia, via, sis etc. chipsets. nVidia 650i & 680i overclocks the cpu & ram at a ratio or independently. So 6x0i users can o/c only the ram to as high as possible.

 

Also, there are faster processors. X68xx (extreme) is the best x2 overclocker, 2nd to ES (engineer's samle, not for sale). Because they're multiplier unlocked - overclocker's dream. You could put x12, x11, etc. in bios. With faster cpus, the fsb goes higher. BTW, FSB1600 CPUs are coming in Q1/08.


Message edited by akhilles on 10-08-2007 at 02:05:42 PM

Go to:
 
  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » General Discussions » GA-965P-S3 and E6600 won't overclock...

Google Ads
Ad
News

Intel postpones launch of new desktop CPUs to 27 July

Published on June 29, 2006

The launch of the Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800, Core 2 Duo E6300, E6400, E6600 and E6700 processors, which were originally expected to arrive on 23 July will be postponed to July 27, according to a recent review of Intel's product roadmap by sources at Taiwan motherboard makers. Read more

Core 2 Duo processors now included in Tom's Hardware's CPU charts

Published on August 21, 2006

Tom's Hardware has updated its interactive CPU charts with the latest processors from Intel and AMD. Read more

AMD adds new flagship Athlon 64 X2 processors 5400+, 5600+

Published on December 12, 2006

AMD today launched new dual-core mainstream processors in order to regain at least some of its competitiveness in the segment of higher-end mainstream processors. The new 5400+ and 5600+ bring an increase of clock speed and are squarely aimed at Intel's Core 2 Duo E6600 and E6700 processors. Read more

Swiftech freezes graphics processor

Published on May 17, 2006

Swiftech today announced a thermoelectric liquid cooling system for users who intend to overclock their graphics to extreme levels. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Atom, Athlon, or Nano? Energy-Savers Compared

Published on October 03, 2008

We compared Intel’s Atom 230 and VIA’s Nano L2100 processors hoping to find the best product for low-power applications. VIA is in the vanguard of performance. Is this enough to beat Atom? Read more

Interview: Bigfoot's Killer NIC, Exposed

Published on October 02, 2008

Since its release, the Killer NIC has garnered a reputation for being an extravagant and largely unnecessary add-on for the do-it-yourselfer. Seeking additional insight, we approached the card's designer. Read more

Seagate's 1.5TB Barracuda: Bigger And Better?

Published on October 02, 2008

Seagate is the first hard drive vendor to offer a 1.5 TB drive in the 3.5” form factor. Meanwhile, WD sent us its RAID Edition 3 (RE3) drive. We tell you which is the best HDD choice today. Read more

Updated CPU Charts 2008: AMD Versus Intel

Published on October 01, 2008

The processor is the heart of your PC, and our updated charts for Q3 2008 show 54 of them competing in terms of performance. Using our updated suite of benchmarks, compare your favorite AMD and Intel CPUs after reading this introduction. Read more