Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Anyone have one of these DLP sets? A buddy of mine just got one, but the
picture quality leaves something to be desired.... Compared to my
3-year-old Mits. rear projection, the Samsung doesn't have nearly as sharp
of a picture. I've noticed plenty of artifacts on DVD's and "fuzziness" on
HD inputs..
Both of our sets are connected to Progressive scan DVD players/HD STB's via
high-quality Component cables..
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
"Troy Bruder" <troy_bruder@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:114gpojt2a79g5f@corp.supernews.com...
> Anyone have one of these DLP sets? A buddy of mine just got one, but the
> picture quality leaves something to be desired.... Compared to my
> 3-year-old Mits. rear projection, the Samsung doesn't have nearly as sharp
> of a picture. I've noticed plenty of artifacts on DVD's and "fuzziness"
on
> HD inputs..
>
> Both of our sets are connected to Progressive scan DVD players/HD STB's
via
> high-quality Component cables..
>
> Anyone have an opinion on the Samsung sets?
>
> Troy
>
Then what you are saying is that the picture IS SHARPER on the Samsung with
more video bandwidth and all the errors in the picture that couldn't be seen
on the MIT are now there for you to see on the Samsung.
If there is fuzziness on the HD input it's because there isn't enough
information for the display. The only weak point in some of the DLP sets is
that they assume that the input is from a Samsung STB which has the 480I to
480P converter in it. So low res pictures from NTSC sources are soft. The
Mit probably has the <line doubler> or 480I to 480P upconverter in the TV.
MY Akai (Samsung) projection TV has the line doubler in the TV and I notice
a difference from those sets who don't have one.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Thank you both for your feedback.
"Troy Bruder" <troy_bruder@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:114gpojt2a79g5f@corp.supernews.com...
> Anyone have one of these DLP sets? A buddy of mine just got one, but the
> picture quality leaves something to be desired.... Compared to my
> 3-year-old Mits. rear projection, the Samsung doesn't have nearly as sharp
> of a picture. I've noticed plenty of artifacts on DVD's and "fuzziness"
> on HD inputs..
>
> Both of our sets are connected to Progressive scan DVD players/HD STB's
> via high-quality Component cables..
>
> Anyone have an opinion on the Samsung sets?
>
> Troy
>
>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.