Anyways, the system seems to run very, very fast. Everything loads up and performs as it should. It's also been pretty stable. Unfortunately, when I run Counterstrike which is not very demanding, I am only getting about 60fps. It should do well more than that(90-100 etc). I even ran a PC Mark 05 and the 11 tests and could only produce a 1601. That rank is apparently terrible. My CPU is running at about 39-40c Idle with the Zalman which I thought should have be cooler as well. (Not evet OC'd yet, even it's already been properly reseated with AS5)
It must be something simple. Is there some BIOS setting that I'm missing? The m2n32 is pretty complex and I haven't tweaked with it much aside the ram timing 4-4-4-12 and this and that (Ram is seated in slot A1 and B1 as opposed to A1 and A2).
Computer has been up and running about 10 hours.
I appreciate any help, thoughts, or ideas... this is really really REALLY driving me crazy!
hmm odd... Ihave a similar setup -200wts of power and -the video card. I have a 7600gt with m2n-sli deluxe and CS Source runs much better frames than that. Haven't tried PC mark for a while. Don't forget PC mark is different to 3d mark in that its tests all hardware as well. Not sure how the scoring works though. I also only have generic ram. Hmm....sounds like a possible faulty video card. Try running a more graphics intensive game and see if you have any problems. Pay attention and see if Vsync is turned on.
Your video card will not run any higher than the refresh rate of your monitor (generally 60hrz for a LCD)
I don't understand what you mean? Is there a way to adjust these settings? I know my monitor isn't the greatest but I had no idea it's refresh rate had any effect on the fps. I mean could a PC Mark score of 1601... from the refresh rate of the monitor??
vsync makes your fps match the screen's refresh. so that would stick you @ 60fps. if you want it off make sure its set to forced off and not use app setting. For me. its forced on.....just works better for me
vsync makes your graphics work less harder because it just throws out any frames that doesn't match your monitors refresh rate.
and amd optimizer really makes a difference. you could be running one core instead of 2.
OK I just got home and am going to attempt to make this computer run to speed. I couldn't find ANY option in the Nvidia control panel for the Vsync. It's version 1.4.6.18, the original driver that came with the card. I guess I'll download and install Forceware 163.44 beta first.. I'd like to take care of this problem tonight.
The new Forceware drivers had the Vsync option and I set it as Force off. Also, Multi-Display / Mix GPU acceleration was set to multiple instead of single. Before changing these, I ran a 3D Mark 06 and got a score of 8XXX. I will attempt to run it again with these new settings set.
Run 3DMark06 or go to YouGamers.com and test if you can run a game like Dirt. Would give you a good score comparison, play with the site on other games too, I think that you're system will score nicely!!
------------------------------djcoolmasterx - "Ofcourse there is nothing that you are doing that will use that kind of power, beacuse you don't have that kind of powr to do things with."
Reply to Falken699
Run 3DMark06 or go to YouGamers.com and test if you can run a game like Dirt. Would give you a good score comparison, play with the site on other games too, I think that you're system will score nicely!!
I ran 3D Mark 06 and could only score a 8800 with the new settings. Compared to 60 other comparable systems, my performance blows. According the overall picture, it's pretty good. Something is holding this thing back. I can't pinpoint it. (I did this with the Vsync off and also set to solo gpu)
I set my ram timings to 4-4-4-12 because that's the way it was specified. Anything else I should take a look at? I believe my CPU is showing 1.4 volts. Does that sound normal?
don't forget 3d marks does not seem to take into account overclocked parts. so you may be right on and just loosing to some people who are overclocked.
3d marks will always have v-sync off anyway....
Also as far as i know the dual core optimizer just add's some code to stop non dual core friendly apps from running like crap(tells them to run on one core only). and it also tell software(or more to the point, windows thru a line in the boot.ini "/usepmtimer" ) not to use the cpu speed for timing as it varies with cool'n'quiet.
Message edited by nukemaster on 08-28-2007 at 03:52:19 AM
If your comparing other peoples benchmarks for the 8800GTS then you might not have taken into acount the others that have a Core 2 Duo's overclocked at like 3.6GHz. This is were Intel rules, in it overclock ability.
------------------------------Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.2GHz * Asus P5E * 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix Tracers * Raptor X * EVGA Geforce 8800GTX 768MB 651MHz/1525MHz/2100MHz * X-FI Fatal1ty Pro * Enermax Infiniti 720W PSU * Creative THX5.1 * Tuniq Tower 120
Silverstone TJ09 * Windows XP
Reply to systemlord
Could just be luck of the draw, no two cards are alike. Remmeber its just a benchmark, at the end of the day FPS is the only thing that matters. My old P4 PC I ran 3Dmark05 and then ran it again five months later and lost 1000 points, but my games had the same frame rates.
------------------------------Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.2GHz * Asus P5E * 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix Tracers * Raptor X * EVGA Geforce 8800GTX 768MB 651MHz/1525MHz/2100MHz * X-FI Fatal1ty Pro * Enermax Infiniti 720W PSU * Creative THX5.1 * Tuniq Tower 120
Silverstone TJ09 * Windows XP
Reply to systemlord
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.