See Gamespot last benchmark: http://www.gamespot.com/features/6177688/p-6.html
Interesting to see the HD 2900XT win the performance crown, beating the 8800GTX by approximately 10%.
What is much more interesting though is how the X1950Pro trumps its direct competitor, the 7900GS. I've always thought that the X1950Pro had more long-term potential, well, this 40% victory is proving it.
Note, however, that the HD 2900XT is currently doing much worse in Windows Vista. The wide discrepancy between XP and Vista results suggest that Vista performance could be improved in a subsequent driver release. NVidia's drivers look much more mature in this benchmark.
Note to those who've been recommending the 640MB version of the 8800GTS "for high resolutions": it performs significantly worse than an overclocked 320MB at 2048x1536...
Some of the weirdest benchmarks I've seen lately. Thoughts?
Interesting to see the HD 2900XT win the performance crown, beating the 8800GTX by approximately 10%.
What is much more interesting though is how the X1950Pro trumps its direct competitor, the 7900GS. I've always thought that the X1950Pro had more long-term potential, well, this 40% victory is proving it.
Note, however, that the HD 2900XT is currently doing much worse in Windows Vista. The wide discrepancy between XP and Vista results suggest that Vista performance could be improved in a subsequent driver release. NVidia's drivers look much more mature in this benchmark.
Note to those who've been recommending the 640MB version of the 8800GTS "for high resolutions": it performs significantly worse than an overclocked 320MB at 2048x1536...
Some of the weirdest benchmarks I've seen lately. Thoughts?