Ramtron said it is shipping a 1 Mbit FRAM device, the highest density memory module of its kind announced so far. The manufacturer aims the product as a drop-in replacement for SRAMs. Read more
A site called Delutube has taken advantage of the fact that "deleted" videos on YouTube apparently remain available for viewing up to an hour or so after they can no longer be accessed on YouTube.com itself Read more
Both ATI and Nvidia used the NAB tradeshow to expand their workstation grahic card portfolio. Read more
Ramtron International, a developer and supplier of nonvolatile ferroelectric random access memory (FRAM) and integrated semiconductor products, has expanded its portfolio of serial memory products with the launch of the FM24C512, a half-megabit nonvolatile FRAM product with an industry standard 2-wire serial interface. Read more
While two other 500 GB mobile hard drives have been available for a while, WD is the first to release this capacity in a model using the standard 9.5 mm height with two platters. Read more
We recently built a $2,500 gaming system with three GTX 260 Core 216 graphics cards, noting that these were less expensive than two GTX 280s. In the performance-value game, is 3-way SLI in the cards? Read more
We’ve built, overclocked, and tested our $625, $1,250, and $2,500 performance machines. How will these three systems compare in overall performance and value? Read more
We’ve seen how far a moderately priced Core i7 system can take us and now we’re ready to assess the performance advantages of better cooling and a stronger graphics configuration. Will our upgrades be worth the money? Read more
Tom's Hardware Forums »
Storage
»
Hard Disks »
Workstation I/O Benchmark vs. Random access time. Whats better >?
| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : Workstation I/O Benchmark vs. Random access time. Whats better >?
|
Tom's Hardware Forums »
Storage
»
Hard Disks »
Workstation I/O Benchmark vs. Random access time. Whats better >?