Ad
News

TSLI intros low-jitter, high-frequency PLL clock multiplier IC

Published on September 30, 2004

TSLI today announced a very-low-jitter, high-frequency PLL clock-multiplier IC, the T98553, that is designed to replace high-cost crystal oscillators for use in serial data communications market. Read more

ATI to launch new Radeon X300 with memory sharing technology in early 2005

Published on December 27, 2004

ATI Technologies plans to introduce a new version of its entry-level Radeon X300 graphics chip, this time with memory sharing technology in early 2005, according to sources at Taiwan graphics card makers. Read more

UMC delivers SONOS memory to solid state system

Published on April 20, 2006

United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) yesterday announced the delivery of a new SONOS (Silicon Oxide Nitride Oxide Silicon) memory to Taiwan-based IC-design house Solid State System. Read more

GPS can help give early warning of tsunamis

Published on June 30, 2006

Using GPS (global positioning system) data to measure how points on land move following an undersea earthquake could help geologists decide if the tremor will cause an ocean-wide tsunami. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Mid-Range PC

Published on December 30, 2008

We see how far $1,250 gets us when building a new Core i7-based system, and how it compares to last month’s similarly priced Core 2 Duo machine. Read more

SSDs Replacing HDDs Soon? Not A Chance

Published on December 29, 2008

Some say 2010 and even 2009 will be the year of SSDs. We think not. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

Published on December 29, 2008

Unsurprisingly, hardware prices have dropped since our System Builder Marathon last month, which means we have access to more processing power at our same $625 entry-level price point for gamers. Come check out the configuration Paul put together! Read more

Tom's Overdrive Competition: Finals Recap

Published on December 25, 2008

With the Overdrive overclocking competition two weeks behind us and Team USA victorious, we wanted to check in with a quick recap of our final contest held in Paris, France. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » General Discussions » System Memory Multiplier Help
 

System Memory Multiplier Help




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : System Memory Multiplier Help
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Hi folks -

I'm new to overclocking, and I've tried to do all of my research but I'm still a little bit confused about the effect of the FSB:DRAM ratio - and how I should be setting this on my new system.

I have a Gigabyte P35-DS3L board with a 6600 (B3 Stepping) and 2 1GB sticks of Corsair Ballistix RAM (800mhz, 4-4-4-12, 2.2v).

Right now, I have my CPU Host Frequency set to 333, which gets me an overclock of 3.0ghz. I'm comfortable at 3.0ghz for the moment - but I do plan on trying to get this higher if I can. I'm using a Scythe Ninja Rev B, and I've heard that this CPU should comfortably overclock to 3.2 with this cooler.

As far as memory is concerned - I've set the memory timings in the BIOS to 4-4-4-12 and set the voltage to +.4v. Right now, I have the "System Memory Multiplier" set to 3.0. Things seem stable, but I'm worried that they aren't "ideal". I have read that your FSB:DRAM ratio should be 1:1, and CPU-Z lists mine at 2:3.

I'm kind of at a loss as to what I should be setting this to in order to obtain the golden 1:1 ratio. Also, will this setting have to change as I increase my "CPU Host Frequency"?

Thanks.

- Keith

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: stranger
More Information

I actually sort of answered my own question. Looks like 2.4 is the number that puts the ratio at 1:1. But I do have some other newbie questions.

My RAM is now running at 800mhz - is this really ideal for my system? Or will setting the multiplier to something else (2.5, 3.0, etc...) improve system performance? I know changing the multiplier will set my RAM to a higher mhz, but does this negatively impact my system since the FSB:RAM ratio is out of whack?

Secondly - what's about the maximum I should see for my CPU under load before I start to get worried? I've been running Prime95 and my temperatures have spiked to about 65c under load. I've read about people having it as high as 70c - but I'm really not sure at what point I risk damaging the CPU.

Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

Simple choice: would you rather have slow speeds with 1:1 or fast speeds at other ratios?

Still undecided? Simple, load defaults in bios & run cpu & memory benchmarks in like everest, overclock both & bench them again. See the differences?

If you can't not have 1:1 ratio, no problem. You can keep the ram at 4-4-4-12@2.2v or even 2.1v. You can tighten the timings a bit to gain better performance. i.e. 4-4-3-8@2.25v. If you're not sure which speeds to set, simple, google your ram reviews & copy their numbers & try them out yourself. It's a shortcut.

For e6600, 65'c is too high under load. I'd keep it at 60'c tops.


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » General Discussions » System Memory Multiplier Help

Go to:
 

Google Ads