Ad
News

Silicon Graphics unveils 4-Gig fibre channel array

Published on February 08, 2005

Silicon Graphics unveiled its SGI Infinite Storage TP9700 RAID storage array Tuesday, claiming it is the industry's first Fibre Channel storage array equipped with a 4Gb/second interface. Read more

LCD Equipment Market Expected To Grow 30% In 2008

Published on March 18, 2008

The worldwide market for array processing equipment for TFT-LCDs will increase 20% in 2008 after dropping 36. Read more

Alienware video array benchmarks leaked to the web

Published on June 18, 2004

In response to leaked benchmark results, Alienware emailed benchmarks to most major media outlets. Read more

EMC makes massive array official

Published on July 25, 2005

EMC formally launched its newest high-end storage array, a tiered storage box that can store one petaByte (define) of data and help customers move files from smaller systems onto one machine. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on November 28, 2008

We tightened the budget on this month’s enthusiast-level system while loosening our belt for the low-cost gamer box by a similar percentage. Today we gauge the effect of these changes on performance and value and compare to last month's machines. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Enthusiast PC

Published on November 27, 2008

On this, the second day of our System Builder Marathon, Don turns down the price tag of his mid-range build looking for a sweet spot just above the $1,000 marker. Let's see what sort of hardware he found for it! Read more

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

Published on November 26, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon is all about your feedback to us. We've revamped our entry-level and mid-range PCs with new price points. Let's kick things off with what we think is the best value at a $625 price point! Read more

The State Of The Personal Computer

Published on November 25, 2008

Where were we in 2008 and where are we heading in 2009? In his State of the Personal Computer address, Alan Dang shares his insights as a user of three different platforms: Mac, Windows, and Linux. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Storage » NAS/RAID & Technologies » Array won't initialize past 50%?!?! ICH9R, RAID5, 3 TB, Vista32
 

Array won't initialize past 50%?!?! ICH9R, RAID5, 3 TB, Vista32




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Array won't initialize past 50%?!?! ICH9R, RAID5, 3 TB, Vista32
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

I have a new system built around the components below that refuses to fully initialize the raid array. It gets to exactly 50% each time and hangs. I've tried the drivers that came with the motherboard and it hangs at 50%, I did a fresh install of Vista and latest drivers, bios, etc. from manufacturers and it hangs at 50%. Is there a limitation with these components that I'm not aware of? Anything I can try? I've made three attempts, all from clean installs, with the same results each time.

System:
Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3R - latest bios and drivers
ICH9R chipset with latest driver and manager console from Intel
Vista 32 Home Premium - clean install with only security patches applied
6 - 500gb western digital hard drives

I've left it at the 50% mark for 8 hours and it didn't make any progress.

Thanks!

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

My ass does all my talking!
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

I've read about issues using the Intel Matrix array and then the array not fully intializing, also I believe the maximum array size foir the ICH9R is 2TB. If so, your 3TB array is too big.

 

Me personally, I wouldn't run a 6 drive RAID5 array off of a mobo chipset to begin with, but having 6 drives, you can still create 2 - 3 drive RAID5 arrays at 1TB each. Or, get a seperate controller card that allows for larger than 2TB arrays.

 



---------------
You got your cozy little corner
All night you're jammin' on your feet
Hangin' out just like a street sign
And put a twenty dollar trick
bc4
Profile: addict
More Information

have you tried building the raid array before installing windows? (the hit f1 to install raid drivers during setup?) I'm not even sure if vista does this but it may be worth trying. From your post, it seems like you are using Vista to build the array???

---^^^never mind, didn't see chuckymonkey's post...


Message edited by bc4 on 12-09-2007 at 07:43:48 PM
Profile: stranger
More Information

Thanks for the responses. ICH9R supposedly supports > 2TB since release 7.5 per Intel release below. Looks like my next step to try is multiple raid arrays or a dedicated controller. Also, I've tried letting the bios initialize the array rather than Vista with the same result.

New Features in Baseline 7.5

Feature


Description

Greater than 2 TB support


Supports data volumes that are greater than 2 Terabytes in size on platforms with the Intel® 82801IR I/O controller hub (ICH9R) on the following OS: Microsoft Windows XP 64-bit Edition, Microsoft Windows Vista, and Microsoft Windows 2003 Server (no boot support due to an OS & BIOS limitation)

Profile: journeyman
More Information

atxz06--
What version of the iastor driver are you using? Have you tried using others? (of course 7.5 and greater)
What is your boot drive?
When you created this RAID volume, did you create it in the OROM (CTRL-I utility), or using the Windows app?
If you used the Windows app, did you do a "Create Volume" or a "Create from Existing"?
When you say "it hangs" what exactly happens? Does it BSOD? If so, what's the code?
I assume you're watching the progress of the initialization using the Windows app (Intel Matrix Storage Console)?
After it hangs, and you reboot, what happens? BSOD? Freeze? Other?

Profile: stranger
More Information

To add data to the discussion:

I have experienced the following for the last six months trying to get my raid1 to work… all of the following scenarios are using Western Digital hard drives, either with XP or Vista as the OS.

I have the asus p5k-e deluxe P35 and ICHR9 chipsets, loaded with XP SP2, my raid0 is two 74 gb raptors and they work like a champ. Loaded the raid driver via a floppy in both cases of OS install process.

My raid 1 will only work if I use smaller than 300 gb hard drives. A pair of 100 gb will initialize and format, a pair of 200gb will initialize and format, a pair of 250 will initialize and format, all of the before mentioned arrays will support daily use.

Yet when I use a set of 300 gb they will initialize and then during the format process one or both hard drives will fault, the same signature when I use 400 gb (two new sets) and also when I use a new set of 500 gb, the 500gb actually initialized and formatted without error. After the 500 gb array formatted, I felt proud! Started transferring data onto the mirror raid and 35 minutes into the transfer, one of the drives was reported to have failed.

I can use any of these drives as a single sata drive and format and load with them with data till the moon turns blue, I just cannot use my 300 gb or larger hd’s in a mirror raid configuration without the array faulting on this m/b chipset.

My first raid machine was an asus back in ’04, ending up switching to an abit m/b to get my hardware to work…

Having sent the original m/b in due to this signature and when the m/b was replaced the same issue is present.
What I have not done yet, is try another brand of hard drives being loyal to WD, or gone back to Abit.

Any suggestions?

Intel Q6600
P5k-e deluxe wi/fi
WIN XP SP2
4 gb corsair matched DDR2 800
2 74 gb raptors raid0 configuration
Ton of WD Hard drives not in a raid 1 configuration
ESATA 1.25 TB Raid5 Configuration
Audigy SB
750 watt cooler master psu


Message edited by thezorfo on 01-03-2008 at 01:47:22 AM
Profile: journeyman
More Information

TheZorfo-- Thanks for the new info. Could you also post the system report from the Intel Matrix Storage Console in here? (You can save it to a text file under the File menu)

Profile: stranger
More Information

I found this bit of knowledge on the WD web site:

RAID-specific, time-limited error recovery (TLER) - A feature pioneered by WD, significantly reduces drive fallout caused by the extended hard drive error-recovery processes common to desktop drives.

Web page here:

http://www.wdc.com/en/products/pro [...] riveID=238

Looks like I get to purchase another set of WD to get the performance I want, @ 160 each.

Profile: stranger
More Information

first post (please wait)

Profile: stranger
More Information

I have similar problem with my ICH9R. I have 4 x WD-5000AAKS in raid-5.

Setting up the array and installing Windows works fine, but whenever the system restarts the raid-bios hangs after detecting the first 3 drives allthough it reports 4 drives is connected. The cursor blinks and the the system will restart with ctrl-alt-del.

Since the raid-bios hangs I can not enter BIOS or either of the other configs (2 x sata onboard controller (ctrl-i, ctrl-g)or network)

The only way to get the system going again is to disconnect the failed drive. Connecting the drive to any other port on the ICH9R will not help.

To fix the array I need to connect the disk to another controller and format the disk (or erase it completly with Western Digital Dignostics tool). Now connecting the formated drive to the array I can add it back to the raid-5 array. It will rebuild just fine, men restarting will hang the bios and the cycle continues.

Profile: stranger
More Information

I have the same MB as atxz06. Updating BIOS to v6.00 solved my problems. My raid-5 array now works perfect.

Sniper
Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

chunkymonster wrote :

I've read about issues using the Intel Matrix array and then the array not fully intializing, also I believe the maximum array size foir the ICH9R is 2TB. If so, your 3TB array is too big.

Me personally, I wouldn't run a 6 drive RAID5 array off of a mobo chipset to begin with, but having 6 drives, you can still create 2 - 3 drive RAID5 arrays at 1TB each. Or, get a seperate controller card that allows for larger than 2TB arrays.


Agreed. I highly recommend you get a dedicated RAID PCI/PCIe card for running RAID setups grater than 1.2TB.


---------------
E2180 @3.2Ghz + P35DS3L +8400GS (700/475 OC)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3268/2588429538_b3c41b29c3.jpg

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Storage » NAS/RAID & Technologies » Array won't initialize past 50%?!?! ICH9R, RAID5, 3 TB, Vista32

Go to:
 

Google Ads