Tom's Hardware > Forum > Homebuilt Systems > General Homebuilt > What am I missing...Bioshock runs too well!

What am I missing...Bioshock runs too well!

Forum Homebuilt Systems : General Homebuilt - What am I missing...Bioshock runs too well!

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Well I downloaded the BioShock demo from Steam and was checking it out this morning. I've been wondering what kind of upgrades I'd have to do to really appreciate how well this game is supposed to look. To my surprise, the game looked amazing and it ran beautifully. I had the detail up all of the way and the resolution at 1440x900. The only button that wasn't checked was the DX10 option, since my card is DX9+ compatible.

I built my system almost a year ago (specs below). Shouldn't BioShock demand more than my system can offer? I was expecting to have to upgrade. Would a DX10 card even look that much better?

Opinions please.

Thanks!

------------------------------ Phenom 9950BE |ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe | 2x1GB PC-5300 Kingston HyperX 2x1GB PC6400 Corsair XMS2 | Visiontek 4870 OC'ed | WD Velociraptor 300GB | WD Caviar 320 GB | ViewSonic VX2035wm
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Just think about this for a second: Who would buy a game that seems to hog their systems when the try out the Demo?! (I'm talking of Mr. everybody that doesn't upgrade their computers each time a new game comes out). Also remind yourself that this game is available on the Xbox 360. Anyhow wait for the game to come out and try the retail version to really see what the game engine is capable of doing to you PC.

My 2c.

Reply to MCMONOPOLY

Well, I suspect that some gamers out there expect a game that's been hyped up this much to demand a lot. Usually, it seems that only the systems that are the best-of-the-best can run the "revolutionary" games at the highest resolution and detail.

My system is not top end, as you can tell. I'm not the type to upgrade just for a game. Since, I was very pleased with my system when I was able to run F.E.A.R., DOOM 3, Black and White 2, Half Life 2, etc at max detail and resolution, I wondered how it would stand up to BioShock. I was a pleasantly surprised at how well it looked!

So, I am basically curious as to how much better it would look with a DX10 card, or if BioShock is not meant to be one of the titles that demand the perfect system.

Good point, though. Let's see wait and see what the full game requires.

------------------------------ Phenom 9950BE |ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe | 2x1GB PC-5300 Kingston HyperX 2x1GB PC6400 Corsair XMS2 | Visiontek 4870 OC'ed | WD Velociraptor 300GB | WD Caviar 320 GB | ViewSonic VX2035wm
Reply to Primus462

I own the retail game and have played it in both Direct X10 and Direct X9 on my 8800GTX, and can honestly say that I didn't notice any difference, and I'm normally a picky graphics whore. If you're able to run it fine on Direct X9, DO NOT waste your money to play it on Vista with Direct X10. Hell, the game even crashed on me in Vista as soon as I got the electric plasmid and the plane crashed through the tunnel. :(

Reply to Heyyou27

Yeah this game seems like it is coded a lot better than people were suspecting. My system was set at defaualt at 1024 and all high details with an AMD 4000+ and a 6800 GT and 1gb of ram. It didn't play as smoothly as I would have liked, but I'm sure I could get it to run smooth with a little bit of tweaking.

Reply to San Pedro

Just read this line from theinquirer: "The engine is based on the Unreal Engine 3, which has been modified pretty heavily, and is coded to use DX10 graphics cards for extra pizazz."

Don't know much about video game engines, but it might work on older hardware since it's an older engine. Picking up the game soon but now I'm worried about it crashing on my Vista & 8800gts rig.

Reply to dswissmiss
- 0 +

i played @ 1680x1050 with highest settings in dx10 no aa/af. lowest fps was 25. there is like no/little difference between dx9/dx10 in both fps and graphics.

rig/ e6420@ 2.8 8800gts640, 2gb ram, 163.44beta driver

Reply to accu

My systems runs the game maxed out perfectly at 1280*1200 and its around 2 years old so im happy with that

 

my system

 

amd 4000+ 1gig ram x1800xt


Message edited by jumpmaster on 08-21-2007 at 06:33:41 PM
------------------------------ AMD Phenom 9500 @ 2.5Ghz
Gigbyte ma790x-DS4
Gskill 4gigs ddr2 800
Diamond HD 3870
Reply to jumpmaster

it is what happens when a developer takes the time to make a good game. even the demo looks and plays smooth as silk. very nice.
if you want to see screens of the demo in dx9 on both an 8800 and a 7950 go here

http://www.renolanslide.com/forums [...] 3&start=30

------------------------------ To comfort the afflicted, to afflict the comfortable.
Reply to firetatoo
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Homebuilt Systems > General Homebuilt > What am I missing...Bioshock runs too well!
Go to:

There are 1219 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them