Hard disk manufacturer Western Digital today pledged that the confusion surrounding the supply of its ultra-quiet hard drives based on its new Fluid Dynamic Bearing (FDB) technology should come to an end this month. Read more
While highlighting the power-saving capability for its Caviar GP-series hard-disk drives (HDDs), Western Digital (WD) revealed that it lists the 1. Read more
In the first quarter, prices for hard disk drives from various manufacturers increased, reversing a recent trend. Read more
Western Digital (WD) announced today that the company will join the market for miniature hard drives with a family of 1" drives for handheld consumer devices such as digital cameras, PDAs and portable media players. Read more
We’ve seen how far a moderately priced Core i7 system can take us and now we’re ready to assess the performance advantages of better cooling and a stronger graphics configuration. Will our upgrades be worth the money? Read more
We see how far $1,250 gets us when building a new Core i7-based system, and how it compares to last month’s similarly priced Core 2 Duo machine. Read more
Some say 2010 and even 2009 will be the year of SSDs. We think not. Read more
Unsurprisingly, hardware prices have dropped since our System Builder Marathon last month, which means we have access to more processing power at our same $625 entry-level price point for gamers. Come check out the configuration Paul put together! Read more
| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : Western Digital drives
|
|
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information
|
I'm looking at buying a new harddrive, but can't seem to understand WD naming scheme. I see JS, YD, JD, SD, JB, etc. I have no idea which ones mean what. Why are they sometime written as "AAJS" and other times as just "JS"? Does anyone know of a website that has a quick read through? Does anyone know which of these should be avoided at all costs?
--------------- The voice of REASON Do NOT feed the TROLLS! Always a DEMON! |
|
Related Product
|
|
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
I believe the "AA" series drives use a single higher-density platter, while the non-AA ones use two lower-density platters. I'm not positive on that, but I think the AA ones are later technology regardless.
--------------- - SomeJoe7777 "Did he dazzle you with his extensive knowledge of mineral water? Or was it his in-depth analysis of, uh, uh, Marky Mark that finally reeled you in?" - Troy Dyer (Ethan Hawke), Reality Bites, 1994 |
|
Profile: enthusiast
More Information
|
SomeJoe7777 is correct - the AAJS have higer density platters. Also the AAJS support NQC and JS do not.
|
|
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information
|
Thanks for the link firemist, but after doing some digging and reading the benchmarks, I already found out that the YS drives are the ones to get. I already have a 7200.10 drive as my OS drive, so speed isn't a concern for me. I just need another drive for more storage space. Someone on ebay has a new 250GB YD drive for $60 shipped. I didn't know what YD meant, I guess I still don't seeing as YD isn't on that list. I guess seeing as I have my 7200.10, I shouldn't care so much. I am curious to learn more about WD drives, if anyone has any meaningful links I'd be more then happy to look at them. --------------- The voice of REASON Do NOT feed the TROLLS! Always a DEMON! |
|
I have nothing witty to say.
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
AA-- = newest drives (high density, PMR)
Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by KyleSTL on 12-12-2007 at 08:24:33 PM --------------- Lian-Li PC-7B | XClio Greatpower 550W | P4 3.2 Prescott SL7E5 | Scythe Ninja 2GB DDR400 Corsair VS (4*512) | eVGA nVidia GF 7600GS AGP vmod 1.46/1.91 OCd 740/910 WD 120GB & 250GB PATA & WD 640GB SATA (on PCI SATA card LOL) WinXP MCE 2004 |
|
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information
|
So if speed was important, I'd look for either a AAKS, or a AAYS. I already read a review on anand last night as saw the YS in action.
--------------- The voice of REASON Do NOT feed the TROLLS! Always a DEMON! |
|
I have nothing witty to say.
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
--------------- Lian-Li PC-7B | XClio Greatpower 550W | P4 3.2 Prescott SL7E5 | Scythe Ninja 2GB DDR400 Corsair VS (4*512) | eVGA nVidia GF 7600GS AGP vmod 1.46/1.91 OCd 740/910 WD 120GB & 250GB PATA & WD 640GB SATA (on PCI SATA card LOL) WinXP MCE 2004 |
|
Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information
|
That is not necessarily the case. The WD WD5000AAKS and smaller are not PMR. I like how WD confuses the issue about which drives are, and are not, PMR. I think it is a seriously questionable marketing tactic. You have to go to their website and read the fine print. I suspect many people have been duped, I almost was. Maybe the "AA" means 16MB cache, but it doesn't guaranty PMR. Here is a quote from WD's website, that is linked in this post.
|
|
I have nothing witty to say.
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
Bastards! I was also duped. --------------- Lian-Li PC-7B | XClio Greatpower 550W | P4 3.2 Prescott SL7E5 | Scythe Ninja 2GB DDR400 Corsair VS (4*512) | eVGA nVidia GF 7600GS AGP vmod 1.46/1.91 OCd 740/910 WD 120GB & 250GB PATA & WD 640GB SATA (on PCI SATA card LOL) WinXP MCE 2004 |
|
Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information
|
They almost got me. I couldn't understand why the top feature on the specs tab on Newegg for the WD7500AAKS said
And the same for the WD5000AAKS said
That didn't make sense, so I checked WD site and found the subterfuge. Even though I didn't get burned, it really pisses me off. WD should be ashamed of themselves. |
|
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information
|
So does anyone know what the AA means? I like Seagate's naming scheme. 7200.9, 7200.10, 7200.11, etc. You know what your getting. WD seems to have different letters for what seems to be the same drives. If you look at what Kyle wrote, you could have the KS and the YS both mean the same thing. (SATA 300 and 16mb cache.) Being an "RE" drive would be the only difference. If you don't know what RE means, you might think that it doesn't matter. RE drives are the performance drives however, and are worth buying. RE2 drives seem to not be performance drives, but server drives, if I remember my reading correctly. I do agree, WD should be ashamed of themselves. --------------- The voice of REASON Do NOT feed the TROLLS! Always a DEMON! |
|
I have nothing witty to say.
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
RE means the higher MTBF drives suited for servers and severe 24/7 operation.
Message edited by KyleSTL on 12-13-2007 at 04:30:23 PM --------------- Lian-Li PC-7B | XClio Greatpower 550W | P4 3.2 Prescott SL7E5 | Scythe Ninja 2GB DDR400 Corsair VS (4*512) | eVGA nVidia GF 7600GS AGP vmod 1.46/1.91 OCd 740/910 WD 120GB & 250GB PATA & WD 640GB SATA (on PCI SATA card LOL) WinXP MCE 2004 |
|
Profile: enthusiast
More Information
|
RE or RAID Edition drives have Time Limited Error Recovery (TLER). From the WD site
|
|
Profile: member
More Information
|
I had sent a message to WD tech asking what the difference was between the WD2500KS and WD2500AAKS before I made my purchase and received no reply. Its been almost 2 weeks now since I asked them.
|
|
><))))º>
Profile: addict
More Information
|
Be aware that WD drives are shipped with something called 'acoustic management' enabled. To get the full performance of the drive you have to download Hitachi's Feature Tool to disable acoustic management. The difference in noise is miniscule, the difference in performance is noticable. --------------- >< ))))º> >< ))))º> >< ))))º> >< ))))º> >< ))))º> |
|
Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information
|
|
