Ad

News

Overclockers Push 8-core Skulltrail To 6 GHz: Dual-socket Overclocking Confirmed

Las Vegas (NV) - When Intel released its Skulltrail platform , the main focus of this extreme computing platform was on overclocking capabilities. Now it has been pushed to 6 GHz by overclockers. Read more

Magazine for Overclockers Reaches Issue #2

Issue #2 of the world's first magazine dedicated to overclocking and hardware news has just been released. Read more

Intel locks overclocking features

Rumors, that Intel's new chipset 915/925 platforms do not offer much of a FSB overclocking margin, have been circulating for some time. As Tom's Hardware Guide was able to confirm, Intel went one step further: The chip giant adjusted its hardware to prevent any overclocking. Read more

Intel Nehalem To Allow Overclocking, Some Processors Will Even Encourage It

Taipei (Taiwan) - Hot on the heels of AMD's overclocking secret , we can reveal that Bloomfield and Lynnfield, key processors of Intel's upcoming Nehalem family, will indeed feature overclocking capabilities for up to 16 CPU cores. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: $2,500 Enthusiast PC

System Builder Marathon: $2,500 Enthusiast PC

We’ve seen how far a moderately priced Core i7 system can take us and now we’re ready to assess the performance advantages of better cooling and a stronger graphics configuration. Will our upgrades be worth the money? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Mid-Range PC

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Mid-Range PC

We see how far $1,250 gets us when building a new Core i7-based system, and how it compares to last month’s similarly priced Core 2 Duo machine. Read more

SSDs Replacing HDDs Soon? Not A Chance

SSDs Replacing HDDs Soon? Not A Chance

Some say 2010 and even 2009 will be the year of SSDs. We think not. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

Unsurprisingly, hardware prices have dropped since our System Builder Marathon last month, which means we have access to more processing power at our same $625 entry-level price point for gamers. Come check out the configuration Paul put together! Read more

All the Reviews & Articles
  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » E2160 overclocking
 

E2160 overclocking




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : E2160 overclocking
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Hi,
recently i bought a E2160 and a GA-P35-DS3R. im using CM2X1024-6400C4

http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/4674/17743442di1.th.jpg

http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/4377/22634342og9.th.jpg


Do you think i should go for 3.4ghz? what temps should i trust? (note: im using asus silent square with MX-2 thermal grease)

why is that when i do other stuff with the computer and i run 3d mark my cpu score lowers from 2752 to 2600..? i had a similar problem with my 4200+(note: im using XFX8600gt 700/900)

thanks in advance


Message edited by WhateverPT on 10-28-2007 at 06:24:04 PM
Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: old hand
More Information

Make sure that it's 100% stable now, stress test it for 6-12 hours, if it overheats/crashes then you won't be able to OC it some more. Although 61 Celsius is kinda hot...so I would be be careful. So I would think that you either need to downclock it down or just stay at this overclock.


Message edited by nightscope on 10-28-2007 at 03:57:13 PM
Profile: stranger
More Information

I've got a similar setup I recently bought for a customer:

  • GIGABYTE GA-P35-DS3R 775
  • INTEL|PDC E2160 1.8G 775 1M
  • 1Gx2|GSkill F2-6400CL5D-2GBNQ


The settings I used to get it overclocked to 3.2 Ghz were:

  • Bus - 356 Mhz * 9
  • Memory timing - 3.0
  • CPU core voltage - 4.625v


The temps were pretty high (150-160 F), and CPUZ showed incorrect information:

http://www.mirrorstonemusic.com/xaneth/oc/OC-2160-4.575V-3.2 Ghz.jpg

Overclocked to 3.0 Ghz:

  • Bus - 333 Mhz * 9
  • Memory timing - 3.0
  • CPU core voltage - 4.625v


The temps were still too high for my liking (140 - 150 F):

http://www.mirrorstonemusic.com/xaneth/oc/OC-2160-4.625V-3Ghz.jpg

Overclocked to 2.8, stable with good temps (stock HSF).

  • Bus - 312 Mhz * 9
  • Memory timing - 3.0
  • CPU core voltage - 3.625v


The temps were stable, though still on the high side (130 - 140 F):

http://www.mirrorstonemusic.com/xaneth/oc/OC-2160-3.625V-2.8 Ghz.jpg

I realize that in order to crank it up to 3.2 Ghz, I will need a better cooling solution. Looking at the Zalman 9700 LED, since the core CPU voltage needs to be cranked close to 1.5v in order to run stable. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 835118019.


Message edited by xaneth on 12-23-2007 at 08:40:25 PM
Profile: stranger
More Information

I guess the question remains, which temperatures are correct? Easy Tune or Intel?

It is better to burn out than fade away...
Profile: stranger
More Information

I run an E2160 on the following settings: 366mhz FSB x9 (3.3ghz) 1.50v on the core. CoreTemp reports 32'C idle and 65'C under load. That is prime95 after about 1 hour of torture! If I reduce the O.C to 333mhz FSB (3.0ghz) and 1.325v core my temps drop to 30'C idle and 55'C load. The performance increase from 3.0 to 3.3 is really noticable and I'm comfortable with the temps as it is. These little wonders can safely run up into the 70's. So I would suggest just keep it below 70'C and you should be fine.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Thanks for that info, I've always been a little leery of running at those temps, but if 70 won't burn it up, I guess I'm OK with that. Since it's not my system, I may hold off, and recommend a Zalman 9700.

Just call me Bill.
Profile: old hand
More Information

I would not use Intels Thermal tool for temps, I would use CoreTemp/SpeedFan, in the article about OC he mentioned Intel tool is inaccurate. Also what is your voltage setting in the BIOS? CPU-Z can be a little funky with real-world voltage and actual applied voltage in the BIOS. Also if this is on SHSF I wouldnt push it any higher, but dont let that get you down, my E2180 couldnt even push 3.33Ghz, The only way to even get 3.2Ghz to boot was by upping the Vcore to 1.525V! So I setteled for 3Ghz at 1.406V. All voltages I'm stating are in-BIOS settings.


Message edited by bildo123 on 12-24-2007 at 03:49:48 PM

---------------
The computer allows you to make mistakes faster than any other invention, with the possible exception of handguns and tequila- Mitch Ratcliffe
I personally pwn you
Profile: addict
More Information

If using coretemp ensure that the T-juunction value is correct (problem might only be with thw quad cores though)

if you;re looking for a new cooler take a look at thermalright's offerigns (ultra 120 etc), scythe infinity, or the sunbeam tuniq 120

They're all mighty good, massive coolers :D


---------------
Got 500 posts, now onto 1000! :mrgreen:

8800GTS revv 2 sooon! erm... December... Better than GTX? Yippee!
Profile: stranger
More Information

Thanks for the input! All the voltages mentioned in my setup are BIOS set voltages. I was able to achieve 3.2 Ghz stable at 1.5 volt, but again, I wasn't happy with the temps running a SHSF. I'll check out CoreTemp/SpeedFan, thanks for the tip.


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » E2160 overclocking

Go to:
 

Google Ads