Ad

News

1 TByte disk up for standardization

Almost six months since scientists at the Imperial College, U.K., claimed to have invented an optical storage device with a 1 TB capacity, six companies have come together to announce the development of a disk of a similar capacity. Read more

Lacie announces 2 TByte RAID subsystem, portable USB harddrive

Just in time for Macworld, taking place in San Francisco, Lacie announced several new products including the F800 RAID subsystem that allows video professionals to store up to two TByte of data. Read more

RAID 5 May Be Doomed in 2009

A story appearing online is forecasting the doom of RAID 5 in 2009 Read more

SanDisk and M-Systems said to set sights on 40 percent U3 penetration

Encouraged by support from leading flash disk makers, SanDisk and M-Systems aim to increase the penetration rate of their co-developed U3 platform to 40 penetration of the flash disk market in 2006, according to sources at downstream flash disk makers. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

We’ve built, overclocked, and tested our $625, $1,250, and $2,500 performance machines. How will these three systems compare in overall performance and value? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $2,500 Enthusiast PC

System Builder Marathon: $2,500 Enthusiast PC

We’ve seen how far a moderately priced Core i7 system can take us and now we’re ready to assess the performance advantages of better cooling and a stronger graphics configuration. Will our upgrades be worth the money? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Mid-Range PC

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Mid-Range PC

We see how far $1,250 gets us when building a new Core i7-based system, and how it compares to last month’s similarly priced Core 2 Duo machine. Read more

SSDs Replacing HDDs Soon? Not A Chance

SSDs Replacing HDDs Soon? Not A Chance

Some say 2010 and even 2009 will be the year of SSDs. We think not. Read more

All the Reviews & Articles
  Tom's Hardware Forums » Storage » NAS/RAID & Technologies » 4 Disk RAID 5 Performance
 

4 Disk RAID 5 Performance




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : 4 Disk RAID 5 Performance
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

We just setup a RAID 5 using 4 Ultra 3 SCSI 18GB drives on a Mylex Acceleraid 250 Ultra2 RAID controller in an older 2U Intel server. I set the controller to 80MB/s transfer speed. Looking at the array manager in Windows I can see that the drive interfaces and controller really are running at 80MB/s like they should. However, performance seems slower than I expected from a setup like this. I have a hunch that the backplane is a bottleneck. In looking at the array manager I can see the ESG-SHV SCA HSBP M10 backplane as SCSI ID: 6, but it shows the transfer speed to be ASYNC and the bus width to be 8 bit(narrow). To my understanding that would limit it to 5MB/s and explain the slow speed. The only problem with that explanation is that the enclosure is built for operation with Ultra2 drives and even has a built in Ultra2 Adaptec controller (not in use currently) on the L440GX+ server board. It would make no sense to put a backplane in a server which would cripple its speed. The enclosure is the Intel ISP2150. Technical specifications can be found here: http://www.intel.com/support/mothe [...] 013775.htm. I realize that term "slow" is relative. I am comparing my experience with this RAID to that of a single 36GB Raptor. File transfers seem to be at least 4 times slower than the single Raptor, but perhaps my expectations are flawed. Thanks.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: stranger
More Information

The only thing I can think of is that the Backplane is an Ultra2 Backplane. Acording to Wikipeida (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCSI) the system should clock in at about 40MB/s. You may want to benchmark it.

Profile: old hand
More Information

The backplane by itself shouldn't slow down everything. If the backplane is ASYNC, then the controller has to talk to it at 5MB/sec, but that doesn't slow down the drives.

Many tape autoloaders are like this - the tape drive is 80MB/sec or 160MB/sec speed, while the changer robotics are ASYNC. That doesn't slow the tape drive down.

The drives are only 18GB, which are fairly old and not the same speed as drives of today. I'd benchmark a single drive and see what it comes out to be, then benchmark the RAID 5 setup. The Mylex card isn't the fastest RAID card out there, either, so that could be a source of the problem.


---------------
- SomeJoe7777

"Did he dazzle you with his extensive knowledge of mineral water? Or was it his in-depth analysis of, uh, uh, Marky Mark that finally reeled you in?" - Troy Dyer (Ethan Hawke), Reality Bites, 1994

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Storage » NAS/RAID & Technologies » 4 Disk RAID 5 Performance

Go to:
 

Google Ads