AMD today introduced at Computex its first Socket 939 processors: The Athlon 64 3500+ and 3800+ as well as a version of the Athlon 64 FX-53. The company also launched the Athlon 64 3700+ as final step of the Socket 754. Read more
Las Vegas (NV) - When Intel released its Skulltrail platform , the main focus of this extreme computing platform was on overclocking capabilities. Now it has been pushed to 6 GHz by overclockers. Read more
A few months late, AMD today fired up the latest and likely last performance stage for its 90 nm Athlon 64 X2 processor with Windsor core. The new 6000+ model is clocked at 3 GHz and represents a consumer-focused socket AM2 version of the FX-74 enthusiast processor that is based on the socket 1207FX. Read more
Nvidia on May 22 announced that its Nvidia Quadro FX 3500 professional graphics has been selected as the standard high-end solution in the Dell Precision 380 workstation. Read more
While two other 500 GB mobile hard drives have been available for a while, WD is the first to release this capacity in a model using the standard 9.5 mm height with two platters. Read more
We recently built a $2,500 gaming system with three GTX 260 Core 216 graphics cards, noting that these were less expensive than two GTX 280s. In the performance-value game, is 3-way SLI in the cards? Read more
We’ve built, overclocked, and tested our $625, $1,250, and $2,500 performance machines. How will these three systems compare in overall performance and value? Read more
We’ve seen how far a moderately priced Core i7 system can take us and now we’re ready to assess the performance advantages of better cooling and a stronger graphics configuration. Will our upgrades be worth the money? Read more
| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : Overclocking the 3500+(Socket 939)
|
|
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
Hey guys, wanting to know, got a 3500+ running in a biostar geforce 6100 m9 board, not the t-force model. But it's got the overclocking options, anyway, I have those, and 1 gig of pc2700 memory which I am sure is limiting me. But wanting to know what's happening. Temps are very good, low 30's. In bios I tried lowering ram speed to 166 and even 133, but if I set cpu speed much over 220, the pc according to the bios wants to go into safe mode after it posts and prompts me to reset my cpu frequency. Or I'll get to windows and get the blue screen. According to a utility called warpspeeder that came with the board, for overclocking, they show my speeds when I hit say 220 fsb as ddr running maybe 166-170 something, depending on the oc, but when I set it to 133 then of course it shows that. the pci bus shows as 33 mhz, and agp bus as 100(although it's really pci express). What I want to know is what do you guys think is holding me back, obviously cooling is great, haven't tried messing with voltage yet, but I'm wanting later to get a 4200+ and some better ram, pc 3200 and oc to say 2.6-2.8 ghz. Question, does is sound possible at this point, and what do you guys think is holding me back, and how could I work around that. Also, do you think the 4200+ is capable of those speeds? And I have seen the manchester core and toledo cores for sale, which is the better buy in this case? Anything I'm missing? Thanks in advance!! Btw, PSU is an ultra V series 400 watt, and temporarily running a 7300 le video card. Also, I do not think my board gives the option to change the multiplier, I'll have to recheck. Message edited by ohiou_grad_06 on 11-02-2007 at 06:09:16 AM |
|
Related Product
|
|
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
Come on, nothing? |
|
Profile: enthusiast
More Information
|
Make sure that your HT link is not set to 5x, otherwise when your get past about 1100Mhz it won't work anymore. I have an AMD Athlon X2 4200+ Toledo OC'd @ 2.7Ghz (270x10) and it works great. I have heard that the Toledos are better than the Manchesters. I believe that there are some forum topics on that; if you look them up I am sure you will find them. |
|
Profile: enthusiast
More Information
|
Might want a better PSU. |
|
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
monster, thanks for the replies, it seems you were correct, I reset the HTT to 4x and fsb to 250 and got up to 2.75 ghz. Now another question, if I reset my memory to say ddr 133 or 166 I got more errors at those levels, however things were a lot more stable if I set it to auto, any ideas? Thanks. |
|
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
Very nice oc.Are you running stable at 2.75? |
|
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
It was stable enough to run windows, etc, but have I stress tested it? No. I am suspecting my ram would hold me back as it's only pc2700, and CPU Z showed it at one point running 188 mhz on the memory, so what to do...I am considering jumping to socket am2 if feasible. Because I want to go dual core anyway, but by the time I'd by another 939 chip, and 2 gb of pc3200 I could get a new board, chip and ram for about the same $$. |
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
Hey, yes this is a good OC, look i have just same processor and board, tha thing is that i have pc3200, generic nothing big deal, and i didn't know about the reducing the HT will let go further with the FSB so what i did was, I put my Core V on the max or almost their had my memory @ 140, from the BIOS update in the REBELS HAVEN that gives you a lot of other options, and i started testing and going up inside the windows, I could get FSB 302, but was just to know how far i could go with this board, so i started raising the CPU multiplier, Memory and HT, this is what i got, I bought a 3800x2 for 70 that now is 50, and OC it from 2.0 to 2.9, but i have water now to that helped me but in air i could get 2.7 witch i was having in the 3500+, so i don't know if this is going to help, but start going up with one by one and reduce one, raise the other until you get the maximum from every one of them. |
|
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
Well, like I said for mine, if I left HT on Auto, which I'm assuming was 5x, then fsb for the cpu topped out around 220.
|
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
Ok i understand but as i said, reduce the memory to 100 and increase the processor, so the memory is not a bottleneck for you, then you are going to have an idea if you could go over that. I prefer DDR instead of DDR2, too much money to change to this new system that is already behind, so when ddr3 comes and reach a good price i maybe change but not DDR2, it's just one single step forward, i want to jump in this type of stuff. GET THE BEST OR JUST STAY WITH WHAT YOU HAVE... |
|
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
Ok, update time guys, got a new overclock. I dumped ht down to 4x, I tried what ferreguetti said, went to 100 mhz on memory, but discovered I could safely go to 133 mhz on memory, so keep in mind, I have pc 2700, which is rated at 166 mhz.
|
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
Dude i got something to tell you, i bought new memory kit a gskill ddr400, i couldn't buy a ddr600, so i got this one, i was using the memory that came with the computer and i could get ddr 414, that was top, but was using 3-4-4-8 to be stable, put this new one i ran @ 466 2.5-3-3-6 but i could get ddr 496 2.5-3-3-6, it is really good, made a huge difference ion the games, rated 5.9 against 4.7 on vista...
|
|
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
Wow HT @ 1403 is impressive. |
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
dudes, i'm also trying to oc, but first, what is HT? and i've looked through my bios and cannot find it. my oc options are only cpu ratio, mem clock, and cpu clock. please dont tell me i have to flash bios to have ht show up. i'm stuck running my socket 939 3800 2gh, at 2.2 gh, cpu clock at 220 (i'm assuming this is same as fsb). and when i change my multiplier, nothing changes in cpu-z, it continues to read X10, unless i move it to 11, then no post, and i need to remove cmos battery to reset bios. any suggestions. you guys know so much more than me. thx. |
|
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information
|
Well, number one, you should have a cmos jumper on your board, so you should not have to remove the battery, just short that jumper for a few seconds, then move it back. If memory serves, HT or HTT is short for Hyper Transport Technology. as far as I know, it works like this, 5x200=HT of 1000 at stock speed so there is the basic math for stock speed, I've read on here that once HT gets over 1100 it does not work too well, so you decrease HT and increase Front Side bus to increase CPU speed. It may be your motherboard may not have many overclocking options, but it should say something about HT in one of the menus if you can change it. |
|
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
Seriousturtle, please also read the guide on how to overclock a AMD CPU at the top of the overclocking forum. |
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
i read the guide and printed it out (for while i was in bios), but can't find ht in my bios. does my socket 939 use HT? its nf4 amd 3800. from what ohio says, ht looks alot like the multi. and i can't find the jumper on my board. i know its there somewhere. i think one problem is that my bios names these options differently. can anyone clarify what mem clock and cpu clock are? is one of them the HT? my mem clock is set at 166 now and cpu clock at 220. for an oc of 2.2. but icannot raise more or crashes. thx for your replies. |
