8600GTS 256 or 512?

nope but as u know in current games there isnt a lot of difference between DX9 and DX10 , also it will take some years for games to be fully DX10 ,

X1950XT leaves a 8600GT/GTS in dust :d
 

marvelous211

Distinguished
Aug 15, 2006
1,153
0
19,280


It's a waste.
 

marvelous211

Distinguished
Aug 15, 2006
1,153
0
19,280


Pretty much but it cost more and no dx10 SM4. No hardware HDCP. No 8xAA or 16xAA.

To the original poster you should maybe wait for 8700gts. We are not that far off. Only 2 months left for this card to come out. Hold out long as you can. You can get a 512meg card that will be very close to 8800gts in performance but cost only $250 or so. Not $370.

ATI is also coming out with 2900pro which is in line with 2900xt performance according to ATI. So watch for these as well.
 
Marvelous
Sorry its probably me i have had a long day, but on the one hand you say not to worry about getting 512 get 256 and on the other you are telling the op to wait and get one with 512 ?
Mactronix
 

marvelous211

Distinguished
Aug 15, 2006
1,153
0
19,280


Situation changes depending how powerful the card is and whether or not you can use AA. These 8600gts are just not powerful enough and 256meg is plenty sufficient IMHO. While the 8800gts and upcoming 8700gts can surely use it for higher resolutions with AA.

 

I

Distinguished
May 23, 2004
533
2
18,995
No, X1950 doesn't cost more and there is no point to DX10 SM4 on a slower card like 8600, especially if it had only 256MB memory as that is too little memory to support the future games higher texture sizes you'd need for DX10 feature implementation.

In other words, buy a midrange DX10 card today and by the time games with good DX10 features come out, the card will have to be replaced again. Today you're better off with a card having more raw performance, the last-gen cards that're discounted to same price range as 8600GTS.

I agree 8700GTS would be worth waiting for, except that when it first debuts, it is bound to have a higher positional pricing and it may take some time for it to normalize to a lower market average selling price (unless some companies decide to start out with aggressive rebates).

 

marvelous211

Distinguished
Aug 15, 2006
1,153
0
19,280


Of course it cost more. Show me where you can purchase 1950xt for $133 after rebate? I can't even find a 1950xt let alone for $130 price range. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127284

Why is that I can use full dx10 effects in bioshock while gaining 1-2 fps with dx10 compared to dx9? :sarcastic:

Sure it's not most powerful card on the block but perhaps the latest dx10 hacks are not coded properly. You can still use dx10 effects on medium settings if the game was slow or use dx9 on high settings. While you can't even do that with dx9 card.

As for price inflation you can buy the card for retail price at a retail store since places like newegg inflates their prices by 10% when they first come out.

 

vilun

Distinguished
Sep 9, 2007
12
0
18,510
This 1950 does intrigue me...
Would a card with Directx10 support be better in terms of video editing and rendering? I am more concerned with that than gameplay although I plan on gaming somewhat...and I would like to try out Bioshock...

Also how long would I need to wait for the 8700? I am currently building a system and don't want to wait too long...