2900 pro?

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - 2900 pro?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/show [...] subcat=922
I know its a pre order, but does that count as confirmation that they exist?
edit: specs http://www.hisdigital.com/html/product_sp.php?id=341

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by spuddyt on 09-15-2007 at 04:08:23 PM
------------------------------ E2160 @ 3 ghz, 4 gb ddr2 800 (4-4-4-12) 2900 pro @XT (those are the important bits for FPS :P)
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

hmm, only 80nm process, are these failed 2900xt's then.

still, regardless, this should help fill some of the void between the 2600 and 2900 at least in a dx10 sense.

------------------------------ I'm a git, deal with it.

Antec 1200,PC Power & Cooling 750,Gigabyte DS4-x48,Intel Q9550@3.4 W/Xigmatek S1283,8GB OCZ DDR2 800,ATI 4870X2,X-FI>CA 640C amp>Tannoy R300/Senn 595's
Reply to strangestranger

nice find , i hope the performance would be good , because for £10 more , u can get 8800GTS 320

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar

I don't know, I just found it on the anandtech forum, someone else found it originally

Reply to spuddyt
------------------------------ Asus P5B vanilla with E6300 B2 stepping @ 3.5
4 gigs Gskill
8800GTS 756/1836/1037
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] ew-benches
Reply to marvelous211


how informative

------------------------------ E2160 @ 3 ghz, 4 gb ddr2 800 (4-4-4-12) 2900 pro @XT (those are the important bits for FPS :P)
Reply to spuddyt

Anyone see these anywhere else? Hopefully we'll get some benchies, but it probably won't matter to me I got a friend who is going to get me a big discount on a HD 2900.

Reply to San Pedro

ooo, who's the friend? :), I'd like to use, sorry, meet him...

Reply to spuddyt

Wow if that thing is released and is not actually a flop we might actually see ATI having gold on their hands for a few months since everyone points that the G92 will be released in Nov.

------------------------------ Anxiously awaiting the Hydra 100 and the Hydra Engine...
www.lucidlogix.com
Reply to emp

they need it, since their processers are doing s***at the moment

Reply to spuddyt

Yeah... but I'm not counting on this site doing a good review on them anytime soon though, might have to check somewhere else for it.

------------------------------ Anxiously awaiting the Hydra 100 and the Hydra Engine...
www.lucidlogix.com
Reply to emp

well, the info originally came from anandtech forum... so maybe they will notice?

Reply to spuddyt

^^ Looking for american sites where they might be taking preorders to see real pricing... not mind boggling european stuff :S

------------------------------ Anxiously awaiting the Hydra 100 and the Hydra Engine...
www.lucidlogix.com
Reply to emp

why is it mind boggling? just because the £ is worth like 2$'s :P I take that to mean any english person is worth 2 americans! AND NO I WON'T LISTEN TO LOGIC GOING THE OTHER WAY :lol:

Reply to spuddyt

$290 for a HD2900 Pro... they better not do that in the U.S. or else they will lose.

------------------------------ Anxiously awaiting the Hydra 100 and the Hydra Engine...
www.lucidlogix.com
Reply to emp

I just don't know waht it will cost, and those european ones are pre orders anyway

Reply to spuddyt

I wouldn't get my hopes up on this being a huge success. They intend to beat all the 8600 GTS cards with this and they'll do that. But unless it's priced REALLY aggressively, it'll just be too close in price to the 8800 GTS 320. Newegg has the PNY 8800 GTS 320 for $279 now.

Reply to Mandrake_

emp wrote :

^^ Looking for american sites where they might be taking preorders to see real pricing... not mind boggling european stuff :S

Just type '145GBP in USD' in Google. Its $292.

Reply to kingoftherings

strangestranger wrote :

hmm, only 80nm process, are these failed 2900xt's then.

still, regardless, this should help fill some of the void between the 2600 and 2900 at least in a dx10 sense.

Yeah, I own an 8600GT as my secondary card and it's incredibly weak in both Direct X9 and Direct X10 games. :lol:

Reply to Heyyou27

well it says its based on the "Radeon® HD 2900Pro GPU" so it looks like its not a failed 2900xt. What the...its clocked 160mhz core and 25mhz memory slower then the 2900XT.
Edit: Im guessing it will have a less raster operators and texture mapping units. my guess is tmus 12 and 12 raster operators


Message edited by shargrath on 09-16-2007 at 02:47:00 AM
Reply to shargrath

So whats the difference between the 2900PRO and the 2900XT. The only difference I'm seeing is clock speed, but everything else seems to be the same. Does that mean we could be seeing an 2900XT refresh?

Reply to pchoi04

spuddyt wrote :

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/show [...] subcat=922
I know its a pre order, but does that count as confirmation that they exist?
edit: specs http://www.hisdigital.com/html/product_sp.php?id=341



The thing about the HIS specs is that it's totally different than everything else being reported. The FireGL V7600 which say it's based on the PRO have a 256bit external memory interface. And looking at the HIS site, they show the external memory bitwidth not the ringbus. So if it's full 512bit then it's much better than originally expected, and if it's 320 stream processors (like we thought after the FireGL launch) then Fuad is talking about a GT or SE type part with 160 SPUs.

Either way speculation and information on that page are running at odds. If I had to guess I'd say the memory bitwidth is a typo and it's 320SPUs but with only 1/2 the bitwidth of the XT. It wouldn't be the first AIB typo this round after their UVD typo blunder.

As always we'll know for sure at launch, but that they're posting anything now is promising that there will be somethig soon. But really I'm a little more amped about the G92 to see what they teweaked and what they didn't. Lots of opton in a mid-life refresh, and the HD2900Pro likely won't change power draw much, if it's anything like the FireGL it should be about 150W +/- 10 or so. The GF8700 though should be substantially lowerm and hopefully perform pretty close to it. Of course, again, only time will tell.

------------------------------ You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Reply to TheGreatGrapeApe

"only time will tell"
true :)

Reply to spuddyt

kingoftherings wrote :

Just type '145GBP in USD' in Google. Its $292.



Stuff is usually cheaper in the US, even if you compare without VAT, so it would probably be a little less than that.

Reply to ethel

kingoftherings wrote :

Just type '145GBP in USD' in Google. Its $292.

 


yeah but unfortunately it doesnt quite work like that.

 

you see prices in the UK are generally around 30-50% more than what you would pay in the US.

 

So i'd say that card would probably retail in the states at about 240..ish....maybe even cheaper.


Message edited by blade85 on 09-16-2007 at 12:21:22 PM
------------------------------ I came here to kick ass and chew bubblegum.....and I'm all out of gum!
Reply to blade85

Well its price is right for my upgrade this christmas, so if its only a little slower than the XT (due to only apparent difference being slower clock speeds) then its sold. Hope its power requirements arn't too crazy.

------------------------------ E4300@2.925ghz
AW9D-MAX
EVGA 8800GTS 640mb
2GB OCZ
Reply to oswold

I thought this was supposed to be 55nm setup not 80nm?

Reply to xbanzai89

we don't know all the info we have is in the above links

Reply to spuddyt

xbanzai89 wrote :

I thought this was supposed to be 55nm setup not 80nm?



Isn't that for the so called HD2950pro due out Q1 2008?

I think i'll be awaiting that one. Just sent my 2900XT back as it was faulty and getting my money back. My 2 X1950pro's in crossfire actually beat the 2900XT both on the 7.9 cat drivers in FS9 by a good 10fps. That was until I turned the AA up and then the 2900XT romped away with it (FS9 & 10 are the 2 main games I use but 2900XT rocked my world with Colin Mcrae (RIP) Dirt to a ppoint where I only had 1fps for my X1950's but around 40fps for the 2900XT)

Reply to hay00c2
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > 2900 pro?
Go to:

There are 1185 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them