E4400 vs E4300; price and overclocking...

Dr_asik

Distinguished
Mar 8, 2006
607
0
18,980
When I'll buy a computer, the vendor I'll probably deal with for most parts is www.directcanada.com, because of free shipping, and low prices in general, although they don't have the widest selection.

At directcanada I can buy the E4400 for 135$, for a total of 145$ with tax (free shipping as I said).
Or I could buy the E4300 at 138$ at lucomputers.com, for a total of probably 160$, with the shipping.

Why go for the slower processor? Because E4300 are reputated for high overclocks, and I thought the same of the E4400s until I read this:

31st July 2007: Please not that the latest Core 2 Duo E4400 processors do not appear to be the overclocking wonders that the original processors were. Back when we tested the overclocking abilities of the E4400 and published this article we did manage to overclock four of these processors to 3.0GHz with ease using nothing but the Intel box cooler. However the latest batch of these processors which we tested two of late last week only managed 2.6GHz and 2.8GHz, neither could manage a stable 3.0GHz overclock. We even resorted to water-cooling which did not help, as it does not appear to be a heat issue, just a physical limitation of the processors themselves. So please be aware of this if you plan to buy an E4400 in the future.

Source: http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=642&p=0

So, what do you say?

Thanks!

 

zenmaster

Splendid
Feb 21, 2006
3,867
0
22,790
I would be limited credence into that report.
This is the only place I have read this, and I did read it before.

If anything, it may have been a BIOS issue on one of their boxes.

Personally, as an E4300 owner, would go for the E4400.

Both the E4300 and E440 are built on the same stepping and neither the stepping nor the process has changed from when they were good OverClockers.
 

andybird123

Distinguished
Feb 23, 2007
373
0
18,790
I would put it down to the natural variance you get in CPUs, I've built several E4300 PC's over the last few months and with no difference in components, one would happily sit at 3.0ghz, the other would only go to 2.8 (ordered and built at the same time about 3 months ago)