Ad
News

SiS DDR2 DRAM modules gain AVL validation

Published on April 13, 2006

Silicon Integrated Systems (SiS) today announced that its DDR2 modules have passed compatibility tests conducted by Advanced Validation Labs (AVL), with the products being DDR2-533 and DDR2-667 SO-DIMMs for notebooks and DDR2-667 un-buffered DIMMs for desktop PCs. Read more

DDR2 price premium narrows to 5-10 percent in contract market

Published on April 20, 2005

Currently, DDR2 chips in the spot market account for less than 5% of total DDR2 chip supply, according to a DRAMeXchange survey of major module houses and channel suppliers. Read more

Samsung leading DDR2 memory push in 2005

Published on January 27, 2005

Samsung Semiconductor plans to expand its production of DDR2 memory this year to the point where DDR2 becomes its largest product category, setting the stage for decreases in price, DDR2 memory is the planned successor to DDR SDRAM, the standard currently used in most of the world's PCs. Read more

Kingston starts increasing DDR2 procurement

Published on August 03, 2005

Kingston Technology has started increasing the amount of DDR2 it is sourcing from the spot market amid a positive forecast for DDR2 penetration rates, according to market source. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on January 01, 2009

We’ve built, overclocked, and tested our $625, $1,250, and $2,500 performance machines. How will these three systems compare in overall performance and value? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $2,500 Enthusiast PC

Published on December 31, 2008

We’ve seen how far a moderately priced Core i7 system can take us and now we’re ready to assess the performance advantages of better cooling and a stronger graphics configuration. Will our upgrades be worth the money? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Mid-Range PC

Published on December 30, 2008

We see how far $1,250 gets us when building a new Core i7-based system, and how it compares to last month’s similarly priced Core 2 Duo machine. Read more

SSDs Replacing HDDs Soon? Not A Chance

Published on December 29, 2008

Some say 2010 and even 2009 will be the year of SSDs. We think not. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Motherboards & Memory » Memory » Mega-Overclocking generic DDR2!!!
 

Mega-Overclocking generic DDR2!!!




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Mega-Overclocking generic DDR2!!!
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Could somebody please tell me how is it possible to have a generic DDR2-800 module, originaly set to 5-5-5-15, work at 4-4-3-5 !!!!!!! Two screenshots from CPU-Z:

http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/8489/imagem1zg6.jpg
http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/5935/imagem2sx8.jpg

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

Photoshop? Drugs? Umm... an application error?

Profile: old hand
More Information

Pure, blind luck.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Talk about pure luck... it was set on the bios itself, the first two didn't boot when using 3, but the others are on the motherboard minimum...! I didn't try setting the Command Rate to 1T, because reseting bios is very boring, but it is still impressive!

Does anyone know a way to test memory speed? Something that's affected by latency?

PENS.. forgot the i...
Profile: old hand
More Information

you see, the thing is, value ram, dispite what people say is quite overclockable, in generally i can get a kingston kvr667 kvr kit from ddr2-667 cl5 to ddr2-800 cl4, all you do is bump up the voltage, sure it may not overclock wildly like corsairs dominators or ocz reapers or whatever but it is a damn side cheaper and works, also since you said your ram is rated at ddr2-800 and your ram is actually running at more ddr2-720~ youwould also be able to lower your latencies a bit...


---------------
-"From whence you came you shall remain, until you are complete again!"

Peter Mitchell

Profile: stranger
More Information

Must agree with you, altough it's not *a bit* lower... :)
Now, seriously, is it possible that the RAM is flawed? Like the settings are having no effect? And is it possible to benchmark it?

boner
Profile: addict
More Information

do you think that an A-DATA DDR2 800 can overclock that well on a GA-P32-DS3L //???

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/6627/overclockdf5.th.jpg
well im using 1 stick of 1gb samsung ram that i got for $60au.


Message edited by shargrath on 09-23-2007 at 03:32:04 AM
Profile: stranger
More Information

Well... try it!
I just benched the memory with MemTach, the whole routine took 167s on stock, and 154s on the oc settings. Definitely worth it.

If you want to try, lower one setting at a time and then reboot everytime. If the system boots, lower again, if it doesn't, return to the last stable number and go to the next. should be like this:

5-5-5-15 (boot)
4-5-5-15 (boot)
3-5-5-15 (no boot, back one)
4-4-4-15 (boot)
4-3-5-15 (no boot, back one)
4-4-4-15 (boot)
4-4-3-15 (boot, minimum for motherboard, next)
4-4-3-14 (boot)
... and so on. AFTER, run a stress test to make sure it's stable.

Know that I'm an amateur on overclocking, so take my advice as my own experience, and not as a guarantee of results.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

salgado18 wrote :

Well... try it!
I just benched the memory with MemTach, the whole routine took 167s on stock, and 154s on the oc settings. Definitely worth it.



142s for me
I tend to use MemTest for my memory for a few hours the orthos for my cpu when ever i push my oc.


---------------
AMD Athlon X2 4000+ Brisbane @ 2.7ghz stock cooling and voltages
MSI 1950PRO @stock
Gigabyte GA-M57SLI-S4
1gb Samsung ddr2 800 @ 675 mhz 4.4.4.5.13
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

slaqado18,

You probably will not see a real world difference between the two settings. You have tightened the memory up a bit, but do some real world tests before you decide it is worth it. The reason is, right now you are testing ONLY your memory performance, but when you do something real world you are testing system performance. Something like a faster CPU, HDD, GPU normally make the biggest real world differences.

The reason I say wait to decide if it is worth it is because your system might become a little unstable. The thing with messing with memory is that it is possible for it to crash very inconsistently. I would leave it alone, the gain probably won't be noticeable. It's cool to know the memory can do it though.

Profile: stranger
More Information

I agree. I'll use the tighter memory settings until I see the system crashes the first time, then I'll relax them, probably to stock level. If it never crashes, I won't need to "unclock" it.
And I know that CPU and GPU performance are the most important for games for example, but they're not worth overclocking right now. One is very limited by motherboard, and the other is still enough for me. But thanks for the advice!

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Yeah,

If the motherboard is setting them memory, then it will probably be perfectly stable. It looks like you got good memory at a discount, it happens alot. It is very possible that it will be perfectly stable, just be careful.

I have corrupted my OS messing with memory stuff before. It only happened to me after I crashed the system to many times. So, if it crashes just relax it a bit and you will be fine.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

salgado18 wrote :

I agree. I'll use the tighter memory settings until I see the system crashes the first time, then I'll relax them, probably to stock level. If it never crashes, I won't need to "unclock" it.
And I know that CPU and GPU performance are the most important for games for example, but they're not worth overclocking right now. One is very limited by motherboard, and the other is still enough for me. But thanks for the advice!

 

So you bought a high performance car last week and the manual says you'd better use 92 octane gas or you'll be sorry. You put 87 in because it's so much cheaper. You fill that tank full and nothing happens, you do it for a few months with no ill effects. Suddenly your nice new car is in the repair shop, and they're telling you "Haha. You didn't put 92 octane gasoline in your car, did you?". So if you are gonna wait till you break something that's BAD logic.

 

I work in nuclear power. Do you want to know what would happen if I decided to use my infinite amounts of engineering skills and prowess to push the limits on metals because 'it hasn't failed yet'? I'll tell you one thing. If even one person doing my job thought as ignorantly as you, I'm sure there's thousands, if not millions, of lives that will never forget that day, because it just might be their last...

 

Sure, this is an extreme example, but it really scares me how many people want to push the envelope for little or no benefit, and say "I'll lower it if/when it crashes". I'm not talking just about computers and cars. I'm talking about everything. People writing checks because 'they won't clear until Friday', the 'I'm gonna ignore the manufacturers recommendations for gasoline', and 'I know that the brake system on my car will work just as well with brake fluid as it will with water'(Yes, I know someone that does this, and I'm just waiting for him to die in a crash because his brakes suddenly didn't work). I could write 50 examples right now, but I'm sure this forum gets the point. Unfortunately if you burn out your components, you'll go crying that company x has bad products, you'll get it RMAed and buy new. Who just paid for that new MB you got because you were too ignorant to know better? ME! I'll pay extra at the checkout because YOU didn't follow simple directions like "Use as directed.".

 

Bottom line: Your logic is terribly flawed, and I hereby will question all motives you have when posting. You, sir, scare the **** out of me and I hope you don't live in my city. Read my signature and eat it!

 

(BTW.. do you use Microsoft Windows for an OS? Of course you do, look at your screenshots! It WILL crash. I guarantee that. And do you have the expertise to KNOW whether it was your RAM that cause it or another component? NO! I bet there's less than 10 peopleon this whole forum that have the knowledge and skills to take a memory dump from a blue screen and determine what exactly happened.)

 

If you think this is a flame, it pretty much is. I hope to God you rethink your attitude with pushing the envelope. You do it now and you probably do it work and I don't want to know that you manufacture parts for the military where lives are on the line. My friend might be out there and die because you are a moron. Complacency kills.


Message edited by cyberjock on 09-23-2007 at 06:17:47 AM

---------------
The smartest people don't know the most but realize what their true knowledge limits really are. -Me
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information