Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
I'm looking for a tuner for OTA reception.
I'm particularly interested in closed-captioning, as one
of my family members needs it.
I tried the Samsung SIR T-451. It is able to overlay
captions, directly on the video. They're displayed,
but there is no way to control them from the TV.
I tried the Walmart US Digital tuner, and it's captioning
works like the Samsung. The one I have also 'crashes'
after 2-3 days, and needs a hard reboot. So, I can't
leave it unattended, hooked up to a recorder.
I also tried the Motorola HDT-101. It has a captioning
mode like the Samsung; but it also has a second mode
where it decodes the captions, and re-encodes them
so that they are 'hidden' in the video stream. (Like
traditional NTSC). This is what I prefer, as I can
then record something from the Mot, and decide at
playback (with the TV) whether or not to display the
captioning.
With the Samsung, once you enable captioning,
and record the output -- it's there overlayed on the video
-- there's no way to turn it off.
I like the Motorola, but I find the fan noisy.
Are there any other tuners that I should consider
-- particularly ones that are able to do 'hidden'
captioning?
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
In article <uonc519pglcqs14goud19lthe0dchh469r@4ax.com>, no@2.spam
says...
> I tried the Walmart US Digital tuner, and it's captioning
> works like the Samsung. The one I have also 'crashes'
> after 2-3 days, and needs a hard reboot. So, I can't
> leave it unattended, hooked up to a recorder.
>
I suggest you contact USDTV (www.usdtv.com has an email box). Include
your software version and ask if an upgrade is available.
--
- Paula
There are 10 kinds of people in the world:
Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 18:36:16 GMT, Paula <mistress@s&m.org> wrote:
>In article <uonc519pglcqs14goud19lthe0dchh469r@4ax.com>, no@2.spam
>says...
>> I tried the Walmart US Digital tuner, and it's captioning
>> works like the Samsung. The one I have also 'crashes'
>> after 2-3 days, and needs a hard reboot. So, I can't
>> leave it unattended, hooked up to a recorder.
>>
>
>I suggest you contact USDTV (www.usdtv.com has an email box). Include
>your software version and ask if an upgrade is available.
When I sent them email previously about this, their mail system
forwarded the help-address mail to some person at the company
-- who didn't exist in their mail system.
Eventually I got a postmaster reject.
It wasn't a very satisfying customer service experience.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
In article <rccg51hf3k34rcnpdd5htp9h4l9v9uj4v5@4ax.com>, no@2.spam
says...
> On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 18:36:16 GMT, Paula <mistress@s&m.org> wrote:
>
> >I suggest you contact USDTV (www.usdtv.com has an email box). Include
> >your software version and ask if an upgrade is available.
>
> When I sent them email previously about this, their mail system
> forwarded the help-address mail to some person at the company
> -- who didn't exist in their mail system.
I hope they won't mind my sharing these. The rep most helpful to me was
"Tassia A. Nichols" <tassia@usdtv.com>.
Steve is VP of something. Also very helpful
Steve Morse <smorse@usdtv.com>
--
- Paula
There are 10 kinds of people in the world:
Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
I use the LG LST 3510a which is a HD tuner (a good one) and a DVD player
with upscaler to HD. I love it.
BC
"Lee Lindquist" <no@2.spam> wrote in message
news:uonc519pglcqs14goud19lthe0dchh469r@4ax.com...
>
> I'm looking for a tuner for OTA reception.
>
> I'm particularly interested in closed-captioning, as one
> of my family members needs it.
>
> I tried the Samsung SIR T-451. It is able to overlay
> captions, directly on the video. They're displayed,
> but there is no way to control them from the TV.
>
> I tried the Walmart US Digital tuner, and it's captioning
> works like the Samsung. The one I have also 'crashes'
> after 2-3 days, and needs a hard reboot. So, I can't
> leave it unattended, hooked up to a recorder.
>
> I also tried the Motorola HDT-101. It has a captioning
> mode like the Samsung; but it also has a second mode
> where it decodes the captions, and re-encodes them
> so that they are 'hidden' in the video stream. (Like
> traditional NTSC). This is what I prefer, as I can
> then record something from the Mot, and decide at
> playback (with the TV) whether or not to display the
> captioning.
>
> With the Samsung, once you enable captioning,
> and record the output -- it's there overlayed on the video
> -- there's no way to turn it off.
>
> I like the Motorola, but I find the fan noisy.
>
> Are there any other tuners that I should consider
> -- particularly ones that are able to do 'hidden'
> captioning?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> - Lee
>
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
BC wrote:
> I use the LG LST 3510a which is a HD tuner (a good one) and a DVD player
> with upscaler to HD. I love it.
>
> BC
>
I've been thinking about that model to use with my new 20" widescreen
Dell monitor (for my PC) so glad to hear a comment about it. I use the
DVI for my PC and planned to use the VGA cable for the tuner/DVD (or
perhaps reverse those two to give the tuner the DVI). I currently use
WinDVD for DVDs and a Hauppauge tuner board for NTSC, but think breaking
away from the PC entirely for TV/DVD would be nice, esp. since when an
e-mail comes in to my PC it makes the video flicker for a second.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
I've bought the LST-3510A, but I can not get it to show closed
captioning when playing a DVD. If the DVD has 'subtitles' option I can
view the dialogue that way. But some DVD do not have the option or do
not have English as one of the language within the option.
I connect the set-top-box to a Syntax Olevia 30" lcd monitor with
composite (?) connections (5 wire hook-up). I can only view the TV's
closed captioning text if I'm using the components (?) connections (3
wire hook-up). Also, I can not view closed captioning during CBS
prime-time. Would anyone have any suggestion on what's my problem?
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
I don't know the answer, but I know there seems to be a lack of interest in
closed captioning and HDTV. I am pursueing a complaint against DISH thru
the FCC because they are not delivering CC in accordance with the FCC
guidelines, as I read them.
I'm not technically educated in this area, but because of difficulities I've
encountered with CC and HDTV, there must be more to it than CC on SD. I get
TNT with closed captions. I get the same program massaged for HD on TNTHD
without closed captions. TNT insists it is sending CC. DISH insists it
passes through what it receives.
Wish there could be more discussions on this subject so I could pick up more
understanding.
Jim (Had to air a few of my frustrations too)
"AGReklaw" <AGReklaw.1qc9vn@no-mx.hdtv-info.org> wrote in message
news:AGReklaw.1qc9vn@no-mx.hdtv-info.org...
>
> I've bought the LST-3510A, but I can not get it to show closed
> captioning when playing a DVD. If the DVD has 'subtitles' option I can
> view the dialogue that way. But some DVD do not have the option or do
> not have English as one of the language within the option.
>
> I connect the set-top-box to a Syntax Olevia 30" lcd monitor with
> composite (?) connections (5 wire hook-up). I can only view the TV's
> closed captioning text if I'm using the components (?) connections (3
> wire hook-up). Also, I can not view closed captioning during CBS
> prime-time. Would anyone have any suggestion on what's my problem?
>
>
> --
> AGReklaw
> This post originated from http://www.hdtv-info.org/forum/ >
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
"Jim" <jwhite18816NOSPAM@earthlink.net> wrote (in part):
>I'm not technically educated in this area, but because of difficulities I've
>encountered with CC and HDTV, there must be more to it than CC on SD. I get
>TNT with closed captions. I get the same program massaged for HD on TNTHD
>without closed captions. TNT insists it is sending CC. DISH insists it
>passes through what it receives.
Not sure if this applies, but there's a right and a wrong way to
handle CC when converting analog to digital and back. The wrong way
is to treat the caption line as video and digitize it along with
everything else. A/D and D/A conversions often shift the video a few
lines. If the captions end up on the wrong line the decoder can't
find them. Even if they're on the right line they're usually so
mangled that the text is only a vague semblance of the original.
The right way is for the digitizer to strip the captions and
intelligently convert them to a separate bitstream. Of course the
receiver must know to look for that bitstream and either display the
captions as text or reencode them on the analog output for other
equipment to process.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Jim and others,
I am not an expert on Closed Captioning, but here are some data-points.
The Closed Captioning standard for NTSC-based ecosystems is described by
CEA-608, which was just revised from version "B" to version "C" (hence
CEA-608-C). Apsects of CEA-608 are cited by FCC regulations (47 CFR 15.119;
47 CFR 15.120). From content providers to broadcasters to TV set
manufacturers, the CEA-608 pathway from end to end is well understood and
well supported. A copy of the standard is available at:
Beyond classic NTSC ecosystems, the standards and practical implementations
of (in my non-expert opinion) are still maturing. I do not have a copy of
the standard, so I cannot describe the scope of it, but CEA-708-B describes
a fair amount of what is required to do CC in Digital Television:
While the tools and methods for converting NTSC *audio/video* (not CC) to
ATSC/MPEG/Component-Connector/Digital-Connector *audio/video* is well
exercised, the tools and methods for lifting the CEA-608 captions out of
NTSC content and re-inserting them CEA-708 style into digital content are
still new, and I dare say the tools for inserting CC into content that was
born in the digital domain are newish too. To make matters worse, the
digital world has so many more file formats and connector types, and making
sure CC survives all the conversions, jumps and rebroadcasts is simply more
difficult and inmature.
Though NTSC had decades of time to work the kinks out, its also fair to say
NTSC was a simple ecosystem to understand and work the kinks out. The
transition to digital is very enabling, but its made the maintenance of CC,
digital rights management, and other things, and order of magnitude more
complex :-(
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Thanks Gilg and Del. Apparently this is something still in the
experimenting stage. ESPNHD has it right. I haven't found CC on any other
of the limited HD stations I subscribe to.
Bet if one of the CEO's of the broadcasters were hard of hearing, there
would be Closed Captioning.
Again, I appreciate it, just sitting here waiting for DISH to tiptoe around
in their response to the FCC. Maybe this can get them moving. Although I
doubt it.
Some months ago when first started complaining to DISH I was told
engineering would look into it. As far as the CSR knew closed captioning
was being sent. Multiple calls later and multiple emails, I was told that
yes, Dish was sending what it received and that they didn't know who was
feeding closed captioning. I asked them to have their engineers set up
closed captioning on their monitors and see for themselves. CSR said she
would pass it to engineering and when they got time they would check it out.
That was 5 months ago or so.
Jim (Wishes he had more clout)
"news.cup.hp.com" <thomasDELME_gilgDELME@hpDELME.com> wrote in message
news:X1lqe.6886$Wk2.305@news.cpqcorp.net...
> Jim and others,
>
> I am not an expert on Closed Captioning, but here are some data-points.
>
> The Closed Captioning standard for NTSC-based ecosystems is described by
> CEA-608, which was just revised from version "B" to version "C" (hence
> CEA-608-C). Apsects of CEA-608 are cited by FCC regulations (47 CFR
> 15.119; 47 CFR 15.120). From content providers to broadcasters to TV set
> manufacturers, the CEA-608 pathway from end to end is well understood and
> well supported. A copy of the standard is available at:
>
> http://www.ce.org/standards/Standa [...] px?Id=1506 >
> Beyond classic NTSC ecosystems, the standards and practical
> implementations of (in my non-expert opinion) are still maturing. I do not
> have a copy of the standard, so I cannot describe the scope of it, but
> CEA-708-B describes a fair amount of what is required to do CC in Digital
> Television:
>
> http://www.ce.org/standards/Standa [...] px?Id=1782 >
> While the tools and methods for converting NTSC *audio/video* (not CC) to
> ATSC/MPEG/Component-Connector/Digital-Connector *audio/video* is well
> exercised, the tools and methods for lifting the CEA-608 captions out of
> NTSC content and re-inserting them CEA-708 style into digital content are
> still new, and I dare say the tools for inserting CC into content that was
> born in the digital domain are newish too. To make matters worse, the
> digital world has so many more file formats and connector types, and
> making sure CC survives all the conversions, jumps and rebroadcasts is
> simply more difficult and inmature.
>
> Though NTSC had decades of time to work the kinks out, its also fair to
> say NTSC was a simple ecosystem to understand and work the kinks out. The
> transition to digital is very enabling, but its made the maintenance of
> CC, digital rights management, and other things, and order of magnitude
> more complex :-(
>
> Thomas Gilg
>
>
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
Jim wrote:
> Thanks Gilg and Del. Apparently this is something still in the
> experimenting stage.
A more accurate statement is that we are past the experiment/specification
stage, and now we need to see everyone understand and implement the
specifications (e.g. insert CC info, translate CC info from tuner to
connector
to... to display) and track down the bugs. In the past few months, some
DTVCC
test streams were distributed to a number of entities/companies, and some
entities/companies have been sharing information about common DTVCC
implementation problems. DO keep your pressure on.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)
I am also having a problem seeing cc on DVD players. An el cheapo Daewoo
would not show them even though the option was in the setup.
I am looking into DVD players with upconversion and wonder if they will
mangle cc. Anyone know something about this?
Paul
"Jim" <jwhite18816NOSPAM@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:2Qpqe.2275$NX4.1429@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Thanks Gilg and Del. Apparently this is something still in the
> experimenting stage. ESPNHD has it right. I haven't found CC on any
> other of the limited HD stations I subscribe to.
>
> Bet if one of the CEO's of the broadcasters were hard of hearing, there
> would be Closed Captioning.
>
> Again, I appreciate it, just sitting here waiting for DISH to tiptoe
> around in their response to the FCC. Maybe this can get them moving.
> Although I doubt it.
>
> Some months ago when first started complaining to DISH I was told
> engineering would look into it. As far as the CSR knew closed captioning
> was being sent. Multiple calls later and multiple emails, I was told that
> yes, Dish was sending what it received and that they didn't know who was
> feeding closed captioning. I asked them to have their engineers set up
> closed captioning on their monitors and see for themselves. CSR said she
> would pass it to engineering and when they got time they would check it
> out. That was 5 months ago or so.
>
> Jim (Wishes he had more clout)
>
>
> "news.cup.hp.com" <thomasDELME_gilgDELME@hpDELME.com> wrote in message
> news:X1lqe.6886$Wk2.305@news.cpqcorp.net...
>> Jim and others,
>>
>> I am not an expert on Closed Captioning, but here are some data-points.
>>
>> The Closed Captioning standard for NTSC-based ecosystems is described by
>> CEA-608, which was just revised from version "B" to version "C" (hence
>> CEA-608-C). Apsects of CEA-608 are cited by FCC regulations (47 CFR
>> 15.119; 47 CFR 15.120). From content providers to broadcasters to TV set
>> manufacturers, the CEA-608 pathway from end to end is well understood and
>> well supported. A copy of the standard is available at:
>>
>> http://www.ce.org/standards/Standa [...] px?Id=1506 >>
>> Beyond classic NTSC ecosystems, the standards and practical
>> implementations of (in my non-expert opinion) are still maturing. I do
>> not have a copy of the standard, so I cannot describe the scope of it,
>> but CEA-708-B describes a fair amount of what is required to do CC in
>> Digital Television:
>>
>> http://www.ce.org/standards/Standa [...] px?Id=1782 >>
>> While the tools and methods for converting NTSC *audio/video* (not CC) to
>> ATSC/MPEG/Component-Connector/Digital-Connector *audio/video* is well
>> exercised, the tools and methods for lifting the CEA-608 captions out of
>> NTSC content and re-inserting them CEA-708 style into digital content are
>> still new, and I dare say the tools for inserting CC into content that
>> was born in the digital domain are newish too. To make matters worse, the
>> digital world has so many more file formats and connector types, and
>> making sure CC survives all the conversions, jumps and rebroadcasts is
>> simply more difficult and inmature.
>>
>> Though NTSC had decades of time to work the kinks out, its also fair to
>> say NTSC was a simple ecosystem to understand and work the kinks out. The
>> transition to digital is very enabling, but its made the maintenance of
>> CC, digital rights management, and other things, and order of magnitude
>> more complex :-(
>>
>> Thomas Gilg
>>
>>
>
>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.