Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > x2900 pro 512mb pro vs. 8800gts 320mb benchmark!

x2900 pro 512mb pro vs. 8800gts 320mb benchmark!

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - x2900 pro 512mb pro vs. 8800gts 320mb benchmark!

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Found this benchmark online. Check it out, looks promising. Proposed retail price at $249 and $299 for 1 gig model (will have to find where I saw this). Will be nice to have a few more come out, so we can compare how things look overall.

2900pro 512mb vs. 8800gts 320mb link
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/1 [...] index.html

Edit: Just saw this posted on another post 5 min after I posted this one, sorry :(


Message edited by lunyone on 09-28-2007 at 02:05:34 AM
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Wow... Great find... Almost makes me want to get one. At only $320 for the 1GB version and with a little bit of overclocking sounds like it would be one heck of a card.

Reply to pchoi04

Yeah, if I only had the $ for it and a PSU, I would've have one!!

Reply to lunyone

*note to self* must sell x1950 pro and get 2900 pro

------------------------------ I came here to kick ass and chew bubblegum.....and I'm all out of gum!
Reply to blade85

Pretty good, going to get an 8800gts or that, if they have in stock in the next 2 weeks!
(ncix.com shows same price as newegg! Yay for parity!)

Quote :

This product is available but currently we do not have stock - order it today and we will ship when it's available.
ETA: 10/01/2007



Can't wait to see some more benchies.

------------------------------ http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/4645/sig1xl2.jpg
Reply to STEMNIN

Looks like a pretty solid card, although I'd like to see overclocking capabilities tested on it as well, as the 8800GTS has the potential to go way, way faster than stock (although not permanently stable at that rate, I've gotten my GTS to run for a few hours at 675/1150, then needing about twenty minutes or so at stock speeds to cool down. Runs stable at 645/1100, though).

But, at the $270 the card is selling for on Newegg (for the 512MB version), it's really, really hard to say anything bad about this card.

Reply to killer_roach

They do look like great cards.

------------------------------ Antec Nine Hundred, Gigabyte P35-DS3R, Intel Q6600 @ 3.2 Ghz, Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme, eVGA 8800GT 512MB, G-Skill 4GB (2x2GB) DDR2-800 4-4-4-10, Seasonic S12 ATX 650W, Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB SATA, 26" LCD Monitor (1900x1200), Windows XP Pr
Reply to deuce271

Hmm if the price drops to $250 on it, I think I'm going to have to get one. Maybe even the 9" 1gb version if it is at $300.

And I believe on the Polish review that got posted in another thread they got these cards up to and past the XT stock speeds.

Reply to San Pedro

I have read the review very carefully trying to figure out if this card is a better buy than the 8800 GTS 320 MB or not. The Pro does a bit better in most games (good), it's a bit hotter and consumes a bit more (bad, but don't really care, TBH). However, it's noisier, 72 dB as opposed to 62 dB for the GTS. A 10 dB difference is perceived by the human ear as double the noise. I think I'd rather get the GTS after all. Still, an excellent card and I'm glad to see AMD/ATI back in the competition :)


Reply to aevm
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > x2900 pro 512mb pro vs. 8800gts 320mb benchmark!
Go to:

There are 980 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them