if u read the forum , u will find your answer with ease
i would go with option 2 or 4 , if u want to upgrade to 8GB soon , go for option 2 , if not , because the $ difference between 2 and 4 is high , go for option 4
------------------------------Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar
4 chips on a dual dual channel mobo is better right now but i doubt you will need 8gb of ram any time soon. So if you can get 4*1gb. 2*2 is cheaper though.
The C2D processors(assuming that is what you have) are not very sensitive to memory speeds. Unless you are overclocking, there will be negligible difference in your application performance. Get the cheapest that will work on your motherboard.
------------------------------I7 920@3.3
TRUE w/1366 kit
6GB patriotDDR3 1600
Asus P6T Deluxe
Reply to geofelt
Option 2 is the best, but option 1 is almost as good. I'm not sure the difference is worth $294-$228. Go with #2 if you intend to overclock, #1 otherwise.
You only need 800 mhz if you intend to overclock. You can overclock with 667 memory, but if you want a FSB higher than 333, you need to overclock the memory as well.
------------------------------Antec Nine Hundred, Gigabyte P35-DS3R, Intel Q6600 @ 3.2 Ghz, Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme, eVGA 8800GT 512MB, G-Skill 4GB (2x2GB) DDR2-800 4-4-4-10, Seasonic S12 ATX 650W, Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB SATA, 26" LCD Monitor (1900x1200), Windows XP Pr
Reply to deuce271
Perhaps you should first make sure that you are using a 64-bit OS, and that your MB BIOS has a "memory relocation" function. Otherwise, depending on the details of your hardware, you will only be able to use about 3GB of the RAM anyway, and so may be better off buying 2x1GB + 2x512MB.
So, in term of performance, is there a difference between 1x4 and 2x2 configurations?
How about the MB? I read that many boards cannot work with 4 RAM sticks.
Performance wise, I believe that 1x4 is slower than a 2x2 due to the more slots. I also think that overclocking degrades when using 4sticks of ram, although 2gb ram sticks are also not very good overclockers. If you have Vista 64bit version, I would go with the 2x2, simply because it produces less heat and takes less space.
------------------------------"Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
Reply to Evilonigiri
So, in term of performance, is there a difference between 1x4 and 2x2 configurations?
How about the MB? I read that many boards cannot work with 4 RAM sticks.
Most motherboards will work with 4 ram sticks, otherwise they wouldn't offer 4 ram slots. But a 4 x 1 configuration will limit you to a 2T timing, while the 2 x 2 will allow a 1T timing, which will be faster.
If you have a 2 x 1 ram setup at the moment, I would stick with that until you actually get a 64 bit OS. If you have to buy ram no matter what and seriously intend the migration to 64 bit, I'd go ahead with the 2 x 2 ram now, rather than to buy ram and then replace it later. Even though the 32 bit OS only will recognize 3.2-3.5 gig of the 4 gig that are there, it won't hurt to have it. Just my opinion.
------------------------------Evil lurks in the databanks as it lurked in the streets of yesteryear. But it was never the streets that were evil.
Over 50. Seen it, done it, can't remember it, but I miss it.
Reply to Sailer
There's probably over a hundred topics that start like this. One more, no real harm. If the OP and/or anyone else learns something by it, then well and good.
------------------------------Evil lurks in the databanks as it lurked in the streets of yesteryear. But it was never the streets that were evil.
Over 50. Seen it, done it, can't remember it, but I miss it.
Reply to Sailer
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.