My main question... Is directX10 worth the performance cost of upgrading to Vista.
I'm running:
-AMD 6000+ X2 at stock speed of 3 GHz.
-an 8800 GTS 320 MB version (using LCD as main monitor saw no need for higher version since res doesn't go that high)
-2 Gig Corsair DDR2
I'm currently running Vista and everything run's well for the most part (5.4 vista score... 5.9's for everything but the proc). However, I went to check out some of that DX10 eye candy so I downloaded nvidias cascade demo and to say the least it pretty much ran like crap.
So I've begun to wonder if directX10 effects are going to perform like that then I probably won't have them enabled anyway... so what exactly is the point of running Vista. Granted as I said I really can't tell a difference operationally between vista and XP with my setup, but I'm sure Vista is chewing up a lot more resources then XP would be.
Sooo... Is it worth it?
I'm running:
-AMD 6000+ X2 at stock speed of 3 GHz.
-an 8800 GTS 320 MB version (using LCD as main monitor saw no need for higher version since res doesn't go that high)
-2 Gig Corsair DDR2
I'm currently running Vista and everything run's well for the most part (5.4 vista score... 5.9's for everything but the proc). However, I went to check out some of that DX10 eye candy so I downloaded nvidias cascade demo and to say the least it pretty much ran like crap.
So I've begun to wonder if directX10 effects are going to perform like that then I probably won't have them enabled anyway... so what exactly is the point of running Vista. Granted as I said I really can't tell a difference operationally between vista and XP with my setup, but I'm sure Vista is chewing up a lot more resources then XP would be.
Sooo... Is it worth it?