Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

GPU-Z ?!

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share

I tried it at work and it apparently doesn't like integrated graphics cards. Which is too bad since its much easier to get specs on a normal GPU then it is to get specs on the integrated chipsets. Not that there is much of a call for integrated cards, but it would be useful for helping those friends that didn't know any better and ended up with integrated video.
Or maybe it just doesn't work on integrated chipsets on the PCs we have at work.
Related ressources
Graphics card Master

meh doesnt even work on my comp, crashes instantly when I try to run the GPU-Z.0.0.3.exe file, tried two different mirrors for downloading... :/ 

Reynod said:
Crashes here on XP running my 7900GTO OC'd.

:( 

Cmon Wizzard ... do your stuff mate.

The concept is perfect and we want it up n running properly.



Didn't Wizzard make ATITool too? hm, he never made a Vista capable version either...

Valtiel said:
Didn't Wizzard make ATITool too? hm, he never made a Vista capable version either...
One more reason not to get Vista. List total - 1,345,291,382 reasons.

Give it time, give it time. It'll work exevntually.

Picked my 7950gx2 up as 2 cards which is just as it should be, awesome! Even 3dmark06 in Vista didnt pick them up as 2cards lols.

That is the way CPU-Z was in the early days. I guess the guy goes on programming binges.

But I just hate it now I know just how bad my card sucks.

2.8 GTexels/s
64 GB/s memory bandwidth
NV43AGP
8Pixel /4Vertex shaders
256MB

:( 

P.S. version 0.6 is working under vista now. Remember Chairman Bill says Vista sucks less now.

Zorg said:
One more reason not to get Vista. List total - 1,345,291,382 reasons.


Lets stop moving forward in technology altogether. :p 
Yeah vista sucks but I was young and reckless and now I'm banking on a miracle service pack to fix everything in the world and improve gaming performance by 175% over XP.

Works for me with a 6600GT (has since version 0.0.3)
Vista really isn't that bad, it's just harder to find options and menus. That's the way it was going from 98 to XP, and eventually you'll get used to it. Performance isn't that bad either. But the service pack should only make it better.

nitrous9200 said:
Works for me with a 6600GT (has since version 0.0.3)
Vista really isn't that bad, it's just harder to find options and menus. That's the way it was going from 98 to XP, and eventually you'll get used to it. Performance isn't that bad either. But the service pack should only make it better.


word. Any ETA on that service pack by the way? or at least an educated prediction?

azimuth40 said:
That is the way CPU-Z was in the early days. I guess the guy goes on programming binges.

But I just hate it now I know just how bad my card sucks.

2.8 GTexels/s
64 GB/s memory bandwidth
NV43AGP
8Pixel /4Vertex shaders
256MB

:( 

P.S. version 0.6 is working under vista now. Remember Chairman Bill says Vista sucks less now.


Why, why, why does your card have more Memory bandwidth than my 8800GTS?!?!? (63.4 Gb/s)

Valtiel said:
Lets stop moving forward in technology altogether. :p 
Yeah vista sucks but I was young and reckless and now I'm banking on a miracle service pack to fix everything in the world and improve gaming performance by 175% over XP.
I was going to collect all the posts and just add a :lol:  . My problem is that Vista adds nothing really except DX10. We all know it could have been, and probably will be (hack), in XP. Not to mention the DRM etc. Vista is a money making sham by MS, as well as an opportunity to satisfy the DRM concerns of Hollywood and thereby control the channel, and additionally continue to be the OS of choice due to HD movies etc.

Don't be fooled, I'm not.
Ask the community
!