Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Q6600 B3, pushing the 62c?
 

Q6600 B3, pushing the 62c?




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Q6600 B3, pushing the 62c?
 
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Hello all!

Most of you will find this question kind of stupid, here we go..

I read the temp faq here and they mention what is hot, etc..etc..! now, but the question is:

I OC my cpu and is Full Prime stable at 62C (the TCase Max) using 1.3v (FSB 330), should i never go further than 62c? or i should be concern only with the vcore and TJunction?

I guess if the max was defined by Intel, i should never pass that, but hell, who knows ;)

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Thats too hot at the heat spreader, and just warm if reading it as core temps.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

Speedfan is the one giving me the 62C as CPU. Should i consider it as "Heat Spreader" as you said before? because the TJunctions are less that that(around 57), with the +15.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

To be honest I don't know alot about speed fan. I use "coretemp" to mesure temperatures. I would download the latest version of core temp, then post back with the results. Than ask for advice on how to
properly calibrate speedfan, or read a past post on it. Tjuntion should always be higher than tcase, so speedfan is not reading correctly.


Message edited by deranged on 12-18-2007 at 04:01:13 PM
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Yes, i used coretemp also to measure temperatures and they more less match with the tjunction temps from speedfan.

I read also that the tjunction should be higher than the Tcase (makes sense), and that if i dont see that difference, i should enable (or it was disable?) a setting in my BIOS, the PECI? or something like that? well, at the time i had the name in my head i could not find it in my Bios (i have a maximus force). :(

Anyways, the max for the TJ is 100, and the difference of the tcase and tj should not be too great.

I look in this forum a POST-FAQ called temps and volts or something like that :) :) :)

EDIT: BTW, in CoreTemp i dont see the TCase, only the TJunctions temps, thats correct, right?


Message edited by u2vini on 12-18-2007 at 05:00:33 PM
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

I believe enable peci, allows for more acuate temp readings.
If core temp is reading a max of 62c, you are prob. ok. You want to keep that processor at 65 and under for core temps. How long did you run prime95? And was it loading all 4 cores small fft?

Profile: journeyman
More Information

Deranged, that's right, the PECI could help me in see why my Tjunction temps are lower than the Tcase, but in my case, i dont have the option in my bios! :(

I ran prime95 (four cores, error checking enabled and small fft) for about 6 hours, since i'm still tunning this CPU, i wasnt planning to take it to an overnight trip :)

I will check different softwares to see what they have to said about TJunctions temps and not pass that 65!

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

I forgot to ask you if you have a b3 quad or a go stepping...
b3 breaks down to 62c max tcase and 60c safe at the core, 65C warm,
70c hot. So with a b3 I stress test to 65c core temps, because in the real world you will never load it 100% there by lowering the temps to the safe limits under normal computer usage.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

It's a b3... i know..! :(

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

np, just follow the temp guide on b3 quads and your set.

Tenacity & Attention to Detail
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

u2vini, your CPU temp (Tcase) is obviously too high and inaccurate. Use Section 9 - Parts 1 & 2 - in the Core 2 Quad and Duo Temperature Guide at the top of this Forum to calibrate Tcase.

Comp :sol:


---------------
Q9650 @ 4.2 | Xigmatek HDT-SD964
Ambient 22c | CPU 65c | Core 70c
Vcore Load 1.320 | VID 1.1875
Core 2 Quad and Duo Temperature Guide --> http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] ture-guide
Profile: journeyman
More Information

yucks, i will!

Thanks!

Profile: stranger
More Information

I've been to 4 overclocking forums, specifically Q6600 ones and i notice a lot of you are at 55-70c under load with no more than 1.28-1.4v vcores. Now I'll admit i live in Canada, but the last 2 days have been 99F (yes i converted C to F), and my chip was at 39c idle, 47c load (CPU burn-in, prime95 on all 4 cores). It rained today and am idling at 36c, on air! All case fans on medium and NO A\C.

 

For the record - a quick visit to http://processorfinder.intel.com/d [...] Spec=SLACR, and a google search for the Q6600 B3 stepping, would tell you the G0 consumes 10w less than the B3 (95w vs 105w), and its max heat is higher than the B3 also (61c vs 71c). Had to say that cuz a couple ppl in other forums said the B3 was ok at 60c+ which is ridiculous. At least i don't think reaching max recommended temp under load sounds right. *shrugs*

 

Anyways, just wanted to see what you guys think about my temps. *shrugs*

 

The Quadson:

 

Q6600 G0 @ 3GHz 1.300v (core temp, asus probe, speedfan)
OCZ Vendetta 2
Patriot Extreme Performance Viper Series 4-4-4-12 1T @ 2.1v (stock for now) DDR2 800, 2x2GB
ASUS P5K-E 1013 bios
Zotac AMP! 8800GT 700/1700/2000 stock :D
OCZ GXS 600w Quad 18A
Antec Gamer 900


Message edited by jurassic1024 on 07-20-2008 at 12:50:17 PM

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Q6600 B3, pushing the 62c?

Go to:
 

Google Ads
Ad
News

Alienware announces desktop PC with Intel's latest quad-core processor

Published on January 11, 2007

Alienware said it "will" launch Intel's second quad-core desktop processor, the 2.4 GHz Core 2 Quad Q6600, on its Area-51 7500 desktop system. Read more

CES 2007: Intel rolls out new quad-core processor Core 2 Quad Q6600

Published on January 08, 2007

Intel is enjoying its lead in the current microprocessor market and today announced more CPUs with four cores. There are three new quad-cores altogether, one desktop processor and two chips for entry-level servers. Read more

Storage virtualization tools refined

Published on April 02, 2005

IBM, Network Appliance Inc. Read more

Taiwan LCD TV brands gaining share in North America

Published on June 21, 2006

Despite fierce competition in the global LCD TV market, Taiwan-based LCD TV makers are pushing their own brand business in North America, according to the compan Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Updated CPU Charts 2008: AMD Versus Intel

Published on October 01, 2008

The processor is the heart of your PC, and our updated charts for Q3 2008 show 54 of them competing in terms of performance. Using our updated suite of benchmarks, compare your favorite AMD and Intel CPUs after reading this introduction. Read more

Stalker: Clear Sky--Is Your System Ready?

Published on September 30, 2008

Thinking about picking up the latest update to Stalker, but not sure if your graphics subsystem can handle it? Hang on as we take you through a performance tour and demonstrate how the game has been prettied up. Read more

Part 4: Avivo HD vs. PureVideo HD

Published on September 29, 2008

The 780G chipset/Radeon HD 3200 and the MCP78S chipset/GeForce 8200 provide the first integrated graphics solutions that can accelerate Blu-ray playback. We dig deep into how well they work with high-quality Blu-ray 1080p video playback. Read more

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more