Hi, I am about to upgrade my machine with a Core2 DUO.
I did not want to change my AGP Radeon x1950 GT graphics card and was thus locked to the ASROCK 4CoreDUAL-SATA2 motherboard.
This specific motherboard accepts AGP and PCI-e graphics cards, DDRII up to 667MHz and Core2 DUO CPUs up to 1066 FSB.
Also I hear it's not any good for overclocking.
I will be getting 2 GBs of RAM (either 533 or 667, depending on which CPU I'll settle on) and the CPUs that I'm considering are:
- E4400 800FSB at 2.00 GHz which costs 115 euros BOX
- E4500 800FSB at 2.20 GHz which costs 133 euros BOX
- E6420 1066FSB at 2.13 GHz which costs 168 euros BOX
Now normally that would be an easy pick except
a) I can't find the 4400 and 4500 at the CPU chart and thus cannot evaluate the difference in performance between them and with the 6420 and
b) I read that the 4x00 series does not have the "Intel Virtualization Technology" command set.
Basically this set according to Intel allows near-native performance to a virtual PC.
Now I do not know if this will make a considerable difference in my case.
However I do in fact plan to use a single Virtual Machine extensively.
At first I'll be using a VM inside XP to run Linux distributions to further accustom myself with them and to decide which suits me best and once that is done I will probably go the other way around, use a VM to run XP inside Linux to run the various applications that I won't be able to natively run under Linux (games in particular and pretty demanding at that).
(I wonder if WINE can benefit from the Intel VT command set).
So, with this given system at these price points which will make the most sense?
I'll be using the PC for all the usual uses plus some video/audio editing (but far less than what I used to with my athlon xp 3000+) and some modern games, NeverWinter Nights 2 and Starcraft 2 (when it comes out) for sure.
I did not want to change my AGP Radeon x1950 GT graphics card and was thus locked to the ASROCK 4CoreDUAL-SATA2 motherboard.
This specific motherboard accepts AGP and PCI-e graphics cards, DDRII up to 667MHz and Core2 DUO CPUs up to 1066 FSB.
Also I hear it's not any good for overclocking.
I will be getting 2 GBs of RAM (either 533 or 667, depending on which CPU I'll settle on) and the CPUs that I'm considering are:
- E4400 800FSB at 2.00 GHz which costs 115 euros BOX
- E4500 800FSB at 2.20 GHz which costs 133 euros BOX
- E6420 1066FSB at 2.13 GHz which costs 168 euros BOX
Now normally that would be an easy pick except
a) I can't find the 4400 and 4500 at the CPU chart and thus cannot evaluate the difference in performance between them and with the 6420 and
b) I read that the 4x00 series does not have the "Intel Virtualization Technology" command set.
Basically this set according to Intel allows near-native performance to a virtual PC.
Now I do not know if this will make a considerable difference in my case.
However I do in fact plan to use a single Virtual Machine extensively.
At first I'll be using a VM inside XP to run Linux distributions to further accustom myself with them and to decide which suits me best and once that is done I will probably go the other way around, use a VM to run XP inside Linux to run the various applications that I won't be able to natively run under Linux (games in particular and pretty demanding at that).
(I wonder if WINE can benefit from the Intel VT command set).
So, with this given system at these price points which will make the most sense?
I'll be using the PC for all the usual uses plus some video/audio editing (but far less than what I used to with my athlon xp 3000+) and some modern games, NeverWinter Nights 2 and Starcraft 2 (when it comes out) for sure.