I'm looking to get a 320 gb external hard drive to act as a backup for my music, videos, pictures, etc that I have on my internal hard drive. I figure I'll just get a WD 320 gb drive http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6822136028 as they do have the best rating, but given the negative reviews, I thought i'd come here first with a few questions.
First question: I've got usb 2.0, firewire and an esata port on my computer, but is there a reason to go with one over the other? I have no need for great speed as this will just be a backup drive.
Second: I've been doing some research on which drive to buy and i'm a bit disconcerted by the amount of reviews the WD drives seem to have about them breaking after limited use and having poor ventilation, etc. However, the Seagate drives seem to be rated worse than the WD drives. Am I being overly cautious about this? or is there another brand that I should consider?
Third: Any words of caution or reccomendations that I've overlooked?
E-SATA
+Fastest(Just like in the computer)
+Hot pluggable on many boards
-Not all computers have it(since you on backup it does not matter)
-Some boards will not like hot plugging
FireWire
+Faster then USB but still slower then E-SATA.
-Not all machines have firewire.
USB
+Works on almost any computer
+about 35 megs/sec is ok for most people
-SLOWWWW
Failure.
Since your drive will have minimal uptime since its running only for backups heat and failure are not going to be much of an issue.
Most drives seem to fail about the same from what i see.
Google did a test with drive failure rates and said that heat was not as much of a factor as some think.
I have a external 500 with NO vents used for back-ups and i took it out once and checked the smart stats and it was never overly hot. so i think that user just got a bad drive.
Other thoughts
I find the software Second Copy works very well as it automatically checks for and only sends files that have changed(this keeps backup times fast since you are not sending everything over and over again). It can be set to delete file deleted on the source drive and even keep backups of changed files. Running automatically for lets say a networked drive or manually for an external drive. In other words i DO recommend this software for its easy to use interface.
For that kind of usage, speed won't really be an issue.....this may be very attractive for you.
As far as "ratings" go, I'd take a look at the reliability ratings over at storagereview.com. WD has consistently been lowest of late with their last 3 models coming in in the 4 %, 5% and 12% percentiles.....that means, say for the 4% percentile they were more reliable than 4 %, and less reliable than 96% of all the drives in the survey.
Actually firewire will be slower that USB... because its likely the 400. The 800, which is new, is only on the newest boards. If it is using the standard small 4 pin or 6 pin, then it is 400... if it has something that actually looks more square than the 4 pin (mostly sqaure) and has 9 pins... then it is the 800... which is faster than USB.
------------------------------Acer AM5620 Intel Q6600 2.4 Ghz Quad Core with 4GB 6400 Ram, 4x500 GB Hard Drives, Thermalright IFX-14 Cooler, and Cooler Master Cosmos 1000 Case. (Video Editing/Game Machine)
Reply to lilsage
USB has more overhead then firewire. due to this even firewire 400 is faster.
480(quite a nice marketing term just like how 54megabit wireless never goes over 50 % due to the collision avoidance system of resending every packet back to confirm it made it ) megabits is 60 megs per second but you will NEVER find a usb drive enclosure that runs that fast I have a lot of usb enclosures and they all cap in the 30 - 35 megs/ sec area....
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.