Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Can u play Crysis? , test your rig with these 2 sites

Last response: in Graphics & Displays
Share
October 12, 2007 9:34:09 AM

god I need a new rig. I'm barely ahead of the minimum requirements. Although I knew that from the start considering I have a x700 pro (OC'ed to XT) and a 3.2 prescott....Although I have 3.2 gigs of ram (4x1 gb sticks on xp 32 bit). But overall that chart is basically just scaling to their minimum and recommended requirements. Doesn't really benchmark the system I believe...so it's probably not going to be very accurate. When the game is released we'll know how "playable" crysis is....

bah...I need cash...lol
October 12, 2007 9:48:02 AM

Bah i didn't even get it so start here at work on this old P2 233MHz/256MB IBM with onboard graphics. =)
Related resources
a b U Graphics card
October 12, 2007 10:08:30 AM

rosu9801 said:
Bah i didn't even get it so start here at work on this old P2 233MHz/256MB IBM with onboard graphics. =)

Mine was just between minimum and recommended, so I'll get a mild slide show now and then on medium/minimum settings :( 
October 12, 2007 11:18:56 AM

System requirement labs thinks an hd2900 is slower than an 8800gts... for *SHAME*.
October 12, 2007 11:32:40 AM

lol, think or know?
October 12, 2007 11:48:08 AM

stemnin said:
lol, think or know?

:lol: 
October 12, 2007 12:12:47 PM

The Game-O-Meter wasn't to happy with my girlfriends x1950pro 256meg.




October 12, 2007 12:22:18 PM

I will never let a website scan my computer for any reason, I don't care if God himself want to scan my system! Next month I'll have my 8800 GTX, I don't expect to be able to run everything at max.
October 12, 2007 12:57:13 PM

systemlord
well i dont think god would bother scanning your system cause he knows what you have and hes computer is real fast hes already got the 9800gtx ultras x 3 :kaola:  but hes still waiting for updated drivers. lol
Maziar
Game-o-Meter Result:
You're set! Your machine's built for speed and can handle the minimum requirements!
Your processor is significantly more powerful in raw performance
Your display card is significantly more powerful in raw performance
minimum !!!! im about 7 bars from the far right
October 12, 2007 1:25:36 PM

damn f@#$r's!!!!
I don't think I'll be able to play this game but I still keep my hopesup. They said (developers and websites) that I would be able to play lost planet or Bioshock but i did with descent frames and close to high settings (low res though).
October 12, 2007 1:48:17 PM

Those automatic scanning programs rarely work... heck, I got a message purchasing The Orange Box on Steam about whether or not I wanted to continue because my processor was below the "requirements"... the program not realizing that an Athlon X2 at 1.9GHz (had it running at stock for once... normally it's around 2.4) is faster than a Pentium 4 at 2.0... *rolls eyes*
a b U Graphics card
October 12, 2007 2:05:48 PM

Just tested my rig under yougamers and it says my cpu is slightly less powerful in raw performance.
Yougamers recommend the following upgrades: A Dell XPS 710 H2C! lol

A $275 cpu (2 years ago) and now they want me to upgrade
to a $7000 system? WTH?!!
October 12, 2007 3:09:00 PM

systemlord said:
I will never let a website scan my computer for any reason, I don't care if God himself want to scan my system! Next month I'll have my 8800 GTX, I don't expect to be able to run everything at max.
If her computer has a problem then we can discuss what she will do for me so that I will fix it. :sol: 


Edit: Get your mind out of the gutter, I was talking about dinner or something like that. :whistle: 
October 12, 2007 3:23:09 PM

Puts my 7950gx2 near the top of the chart, could go up 7bars. Sais it reccomends a 8800gts because its slightly more powerful, although im pretty sure my 3ghz quad will easily make up for that.
a c 169 U Graphics card
October 12, 2007 4:55:13 PM

hopefully mine is like this :

a c 169 U Graphics card
October 12, 2007 4:57:26 PM

" alt="" class="imgLz frmImg " />
October 12, 2007 6:26:49 PM

"well i dont think god would bother scanning your system cause he knows what you have and hes computer is real fast hes already got the 9800gtx ultras x 3 but hes still waiting for updated drivers."


That made my day, thanks sirkillalot
a b U Graphics card
October 12, 2007 6:43:52 PM

I think the devil is working at ATI/AMD/nVidia. He's the one holding the drivers back. Think he's been taking out the engineers out for lunch to Hooters or something and putting things in their drinks, so they don't feel too good and want to go home early, thus not getting the full 8 hrs. of work out of them.
October 12, 2007 6:50:27 PM

Yeah, I tested my computer for Crysis, and It doesn't quite register everything right. It says that my X1950pro only has 256 megs, that's half true, I have two in crossfire. The test didn't recognize the crossfire cards.
October 12, 2007 6:57:52 PM

ira176 said:
Yeah, I tested my computer for Crysis, and It doesn't quite register everything right. It says that my X1950pro only has 256 megs, that's half true, I have two in crossfire. The test didn't recognize the crossfire cards.

Crossfire does not mean 2x the ram
256mb = 256mb
single card or Crossfire
a c 130 U Graphics card
October 12, 2007 7:17:24 PM

Im with systemlord im not about to let some website poke about in my system i am quite happy to wait untill its installed on my pc to find out how it runs.
Mactronix
October 12, 2007 7:58:57 PM

What the..?

Quote:
PASS, but the Speed could NOT be analyzed.


What does that mean?



Video card fails :non:  320MB :pt1cable: 
October 12, 2007 8:11:25 PM

If you use the first link it doesn't need any instillations and is completely safe, I'm not installing the program on the 2nd link.
October 12, 2007 8:11:59 PM

stemnin said:
What the..?

Quote:
PASS, but the Speed could NOT be analyzed.


What does that mean?

http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/3324/graphall4ut5.gif

Video card fails :non:  320MB :pt1cable: 


Carefully analyzing the picture, it looks like your computer still needs dusting to be free of cobwebs and household dust. Doing this will give you a pass on the recomended settings.

Also, using some polish on the front bezel to give it a nice silvery shine will put you right at the top. But before polishing it, paint it a nice glossy silver.
October 12, 2007 9:47:35 PM

No way am I installing the bloated Sun JVM for any website.
a c 169 U Graphics card
October 13, 2007 3:11:58 PM

OC'd my CPU to 3.0 and here is the result : :D  :bounce:  :) 

" alt="" class="imgLz frmImg " />
October 13, 2007 4:10:01 PM

Both my cpu and gpu are too slow. Ah well, next year ill buy myself a nice quad core or something, with .. of course.. a midrange gpu..
October 13, 2007 4:29:32 PM

WOOOOOOO!!! I made it! I can play crysis! lol. Will the system pass one of those cheap video cards that has 512 or more memory? It's got 512, it must go fast!!!
a c 358 U Graphics card
October 13, 2007 5:26:22 PM

Well I'm sure my system is above minimum, but below recommended because of my X1900XT 512MB.
October 13, 2007 5:39:12 PM

I hit everything on recommended except for the graphics, the 7900GS in the system currently can't handle recommended, but the 8800GTX on order will. muahahahaha.
a c 130 U Graphics card
October 13, 2007 5:39:15 PM

Hatman said:
If you use the first link it doesn't need any instillations and is completely safe, I'm not installing the program on the 2nd link.


Oh yea so why is it asking for instalation rights on my security settings then?
Mactronix :) 
October 13, 2007 5:46:34 PM

I used the first link and just had to install a Java app....so Hatman is wrong. You do have to install something.
October 13, 2007 8:16:11 PM

After I ran this, a crevasse formed between myself and my computer, probably about 2 feet wide. Just enough to catch my attention.

Then my computer gave me an error message (*The following web site http://www.yougamers.com/gameometer/10213/ has hurt my feelings, windows will now shut down until I feel like starting back up*)


Um.. for I am 1 bar away from recommended - only 1.5 gig of memory... with an 8600gt 256mb card =P
October 14, 2007 1:02:29 AM

ira176 said:
Yeah, I tested my computer for Crysis, and It doesn't quite register everything right. It says that my X1950pro only has 256 megs, that's half true, I have two in crossfire. The test didn't recognize the crossfire cards.


I guess what I meant to say is that the gameometer doesn't register my crossfire set up. However, when the crossfire is activated, I do have a total of 512 mb of framebuffer memory between the two cards.
October 14, 2007 2:03:05 AM

ira176 said:
I guess what I meant to say is that the gameometer doesn't register my crossfire set up. However, when the crossfire is activated, I do have a total of 512 mb of framebuffer memory between the two cards.


No no, if you have two graphics cards in SLI or Cross Fire and both cards have 256MB of Vram you can't say you now have a 512MB frame buffer it don't work like that. Each card renders one half of the screen at 256MB and the other half at 256MB, you still have a 256MB framebuffer with both cards. Graphics cards don't run in dual channel mode, but they do work together.
October 14, 2007 3:14:07 AM

Already knew I could play Crysis.
October 14, 2007 7:04:44 AM

Haven't you guys played the beta? I've played it and on my main computer is running pretty decent on medium that's on a athlon x2 5200+, an ati radeon x1950xt and 2gb of a-data vitesta ram.
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2007 7:37:29 AM

It runs like absolute rubbish on low on my 3700 (at 2.6) x1950 pro system with 2gb RAM. That's at any resolution, even 640x480. 15-25fps average outside. In a gunfight I can get below 15.
October 14, 2007 10:58:57 AM

justinmcg67 said:
I used the first link and just had to install a Java app....so Hatman is wrong. You do have to install something.



mm.. well it didnt install anything on mine.
a b U Graphics card
October 14, 2007 8:16:44 PM

randomizer said:
It runs like absolute rubbish on low on my 3700 (at 2.6) x1950 pro system with 2gb RAM. That's at any resolution, even 640x480. 15-25fps average outside. In a gunfight I can get below 15.

OUCH!!! :fou:  I'm betting than my AMD 3200+ w/x1800xt 256mb would be an absolute slide show :cry: 
a b U Graphics card
October 15, 2007 3:04:43 AM

lunyone said:
OUCH!!! :fou:  I'm betting than my AMD 3200+ w/x1800xt 256mb would be an absolute slide show :cry: 

Well let's put things into perspective here. My dad has 4gb RAM and vista x64. He has an E6600 @2.7 (I think) and an x800GTO overclocked to something that I don't remember. He get's consistantly better framerates than me (I'd say he gets 20fps min and averages around 35) on low settings with a higher resolution even. He just get's graphical anomolies coz the beta doesn't support SM2 cards, like cloaked guys turn white and appear through walls and terrain, and you can see them across the whole map. It's an unintentional cheat :D 
a b U Graphics card
October 15, 2007 4:05:33 AM

Thus the faster frames, because no detail is used on the character. Use that on him, the next time he says he's got a better rig!!! Hehehehehe
October 15, 2007 4:07:43 AM

stemnin said:
lol, think or know?


I tested my system and its quite a bit above the Recommended.

And by the way I have a HD2900Pro 1GB GDDR4 running the Catalyst 7.10 drivers and in 3DMark05 beat a system thats the same as mine only it has a 8800GTS 640 by about 3k.

So yea the HD2900Pro is a good card and the drivers are just now unleashing its potential.

And God has something way better than a 9800xt x3 in SLI. He has a 28000 x8 in SLI 2.0 all running on PCIe 4.0. Not to mention his 32 core CPU running at 5GHz each and 32Gigs of dual channel DDR6 and 50terabytes in a SATA5 RAID0.

Man I envy God.
a b U Graphics card
October 15, 2007 4:15:55 AM

lunyone said:
Thus the faster frames, because no detail is used on the character. Use that on him, the next time he says he's got a better rig!!! Hehehehehe

It's not the point though, I should still get at least 25fps min at 1024x768 on low, gee.
a c 169 U Graphics card
October 15, 2007 12:07:32 PM

nice score
October 15, 2007 12:56:55 PM

I think dual core is a must have for crysis that's how i explain the poor performance you got.
October 15, 2007 1:21:53 PM

here is what I got:

"Game-o-Meter Result:

Either your hardware is too new, too old or too rare - we don't know enough of it to give an accurate estimation. Sorry. "
!