Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Can u play Crysis? , test your rig with these 2 sites

Can u play Crysis? , test your rig with these 2 sites

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Can u play Crysis? , test your rig with these 2 sites

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Page:    Previous 1 2 3 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
 

http://www.yougamers.com/gameometer/10213/

http://www.systemrequirementslab.c [...] on_id=5407

both sites now have the correct system requirements


Message edited by Maziar on 10-19-2007 at 08:47:19 AM
------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

god I need a new rig. I'm barely ahead of the minimum requirements. Although I knew that from the start considering I have a x700 pro (OC'ed to XT) and a 3.2 prescott....Although I have 3.2 gigs of ram (4x1 gb sticks on xp 32 bit). But overall that chart is basically just scaling to their minimum and recommended requirements. Doesn't really benchmark the system I believe...so it's probably not going to be very accurate. When the game is released we'll know how "playable" crysis is....

 

bah...I need cash...lol


Message edited by Kamrooz on 10-12-2007 at 11:35:10 AM
Reply to Kamrooz

Bah i didn't even get it so start here at work on this old P2 233MHz/256MB IBM with onboard graphics. =)

Reply to rosu9801
- 0 +

rosu9801 wrote :

Bah i didn't even get it so start here at work on this old P2 233MHz/256MB IBM with onboard graphics. =)


Mine was just between minimum and recommended, so I'll get a mild slide show now and then on medium/minimum settings :(

------------------------------ PSU Tiers
GPU Power
8800gtx w/e6600 OC'd will run on Antec 380w w/27A on 12v rail, PSU!!
Reply to lunyone

System requirement labs thinks an hd2900 is slower than an 8800gts... for *SHAME*.

Reply to Rabidpeanut
- 0 +

lol, think or know?

------------------------------ http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/4645/sig1xl2.jpg
Reply to STEMNIN
- 0 +

The Game-O-Meter wasn't to happy with my girlfriends x1950pro 256meg.

http://i22.tinypic.com/2dq8le.jpg

http://i21.tinypic.com/29vax3o.jpg

Reply to Zorg

I will never let a website scan my computer for any reason, I don't care if God himself want to scan my system! Next month I'll have my 8800 GTX, I don't expect to be able to run everything at max.

------------------------------ Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.2GHz * Asus P5E * 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix Tracers * Raptor X * EVGA Geforce 8800GTX 768MB 651MHz/1525MHz/2100MHz * X-FI Fatal1ty Pro * Enermax Infiniti 720W PSU * Creative THX5.1 * Tuniq Tower 120
Silverstone TJ09 * Windows XP
Reply to systemlord

systemlord
well i dont think god would bother scanning your system cause he knows what you have and hes computer is real fast hes already got the 9800gtx ultras x 3 :kaola: but hes still waiting for updated drivers. lol
Maziar
Game-o-Meter Result:
You're set! Your machine's built for speed and can handle the minimum requirements!
Your processor is significantly more powerful in raw performance
Your display card is significantly more powerful in raw performance
minimum !!!! im about 7 bars from the far right


Message edited by sirkillalot on 10-12-2007 at 03:03:17 PM
------------------------------ AMD P2955X4 ATI 5870 DX11 [:boudy:2]
24" dell 1900x1200 2x74 wraptor hd's1 X-FI pro gamer sounds
2G ram log.Z5500 speakers 650w toughpower G15kb dvd....ITS A MEAN GREEN GAMING MACHINE
Reply to sirkillalot

damn f@#$r's!!!!
I don't think I'll be able to play this game but I still keep my hopesup. They said (developers and websites) that I would be able to play lost planet or Bioshock but i did with descent frames and close to high settings (low res though).

------------------------------ They mostly come at night. Mostly...
http://s2.battleknight.gr/index.ph [...] f=MzU4NzE=
Reply to blashyrkh

Those automatic scanning programs rarely work... heck, I got a message purchasing The Orange Box on Steam about whether or not I wanted to continue because my processor was below the "requirements"... the program not realizing that an Athlon X2 at 1.9GHz (had it running at stock for once... normally it's around 2.4) is faster than a Pentium 4 at 2.0... *rolls eyes*

Reply to killer_roach
- 0 +

Just tested my rig under yougamers and it says my cpu is slightly less powerful in raw performance.
Yougamers recommend the following upgrades: A Dell XPS 710 H2C! lol

A $275 cpu (2 years ago) and now they want me to upgrade
to a $7000 system? WTH?!!

Reply to lp231
- 0 +

systemlord wrote :

I will never let a website scan my computer for any reason, I don't care if God himself want to scan my system! Next month I'll have my 8800 GTX, I don't expect to be able to run everything at max.

If her computer has a problem then we can discuss what she will do for me so that I will fix it. :sol:

 


Edit: Get your mind out of the gutter, I was talking about dinner or something like that. :whistle:


Message edited by Zorg on 10-12-2007 at 05:12:22 PM
Reply to Zorg
- 0 +

Puts my 7950gx2 near the top of the chart, could go up 7bars. Sais it reccomends a 8800gts because its slightly more powerful, although im pretty sure my 3ghz quad will easily make up for that.

------------------------------ Na na na na na na na na HATMAN!
Reply to Hatman
- 0 +

hopefully mine is like this :


Message edited by Maziar on 10-12-2007 at 06:56:15 PM
------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar
- 0 +
------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar

"well i dont think god would bother scanning your system cause he knows what you have and hes computer is real fast hes already got the 9800gtx ultras x 3 but hes still waiting for updated drivers."


That made my day, thanks sirkillalot

Reply to SpinachEater
- 0 +

I think the devil is working at ATI/AMD/nVidia. He's the one holding the drivers back. Think he's been taking out the engineers out for lunch to Hooters or something and putting things in their drinks, so they don't feel too good and want to go home early, thus not getting the full 8 hrs. of work out of them.


Message edited by lunyone on 10-12-2007 at 08:45:10 PM
Reply to lunyone
- 0 +

Yeah, I tested my computer for Crysis, and It doesn't quite register everything right. It says that my X1950pro only has 256 megs, that's half true, I have two in crossfire. The test didn't recognize the crossfire cards.

Reply to ira176
- 0 +

ira176 wrote :

Yeah, I tested my computer for Crysis, and It doesn't quite register everything right. It says that my X1950pro only has 256 megs, that's half true, I have two in crossfire. The test didn't recognize the crossfire cards.


Crossfire does not mean 2x the ram
256mb = 256mb
single card or Crossfire

------------------------------ P35-DS3L Rev 2 bios F9C l E8400 @ 3.6Ghz @ 1.232v l OCZ Vendetta 2 /LGA775 Bolt-Thru l 4GB G.Skill 8800PI@1000mhz 4:5 @ 1.87v l WD3200AAKS 320GB l Evga 8800GTS 512 l X-Fi Xtreme Music l Corsair HX520 l Antec Sonata III 500 l Vista32 SP2 l Win7 X64 7600
Reply to kpo6969

Im with systemlord im not about to let some website poke about in my system i am quite happy to wait untill its installed on my pc to find out how it runs.
Mactronix

Reply to mactronix
- 0 +

What the..?

Quote :

PASS, but the Speed could NOT be analyzed.



What does that mean?

http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/3324/graphall4ut5.gif

Video card fails :non: 320MB :pt1cable:

------------------------------ http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/4645/sig1xl2.jpg
Reply to STEMNIN
- 0 +

If you use the first link it doesn't need any instillations and is completely safe, I'm not installing the program on the 2nd link.

------------------------------ Na na na na na na na na HATMAN!
Reply to Hatman

STEMNIN wrote :

What the..?

Quote :

PASS, but the Speed could NOT be analyzed.



What does that mean?

http://img250.imageshack.us/img250 [...] ll4ut5.gif

Video card fails :non: 320MB :pt1cable:



Carefully analyzing the picture, it looks like your computer still needs dusting to be free of cobwebs and household dust. Doing this will give you a pass on the recomended settings.

Also, using some polish on the front bezel to give it a nice silvery shine will put you right at the top. But before polishing it, paint it a nice glossy silver.


Message edited by ShortRef on 10-12-2007 at 10:13:38 PM
Reply to ShortRef
- 0 +

No way am I installing the bloated Sun JVM for any website.

Reply to ethel
- 0 +

OC'd my CPU to 3.0 and here is the result : :D :bounce: :)

[img]http://img3.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/th.bcae26c28f.jpg

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar
- 0 +

Both my cpu and gpu are too slow. Ah well, next year ill buy myself a nice quad core or something, with .. of course.. a midrange gpu..

------------------------------ Desktop: AMD Athlon 4200+ (2,66Ghz), 2GB DDR, Ati Radeon HD3870, Samsung Syncmaster 19" 931bw | Windows 7 build 7600 x64 (RTM)
Notebook: Intel Centrino T8100 (2,1Ghz), 4GB DDR2-667, Ati Radeon Mobility HD3470 | Windows 7 build 7600 x64 (RTM)
Reply to FeareX

WOOOOOOO!!! I made it! I can play crysis! lol. Will the system pass one of those cheap video cards that has 512 or more memory? It's got 512, it must go fast!!!


Message edited by bobert866 on 10-13-2007 at 06:29:57 PM
------------------------------ Vista Home Premium.Gigabyte GA-P35DS3L. Intel Q6600 @ 3.4- Thermalright ultra 120. Scythe 120mm.4gb Geil DDR2 800.OCZ GameXstream 700w.EVGA GTX 280.Soundblaster Audigy 2 zs.Antec 900.2x Western Digital Caviar SE16 320gb B3
1x Western Digital 500gb GP
Reply to bobert866

Well I'm sure my system is above minimum, but below recommended because of my X1900XT 512MB.

------------------------------ Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | HD 5850 | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi and Planar PX2611w | WinXP

Peace on Earth by means of the destruction of all life on Earth.
Reply to jaguarskx

I hit everything on recommended except for the graphics, the 7900GS in the system currently can't handle recommended, but the 8800GTX on order will. muahahahaha.

------------------------------ Intel NWPD Employee. Hawthorn Farm Campus. Navy DEPer, Ship Date: 080122 (YY/MM/DD)
Reply to justinmcg67

Hatman wrote :

If you use the first link it doesn't need any instillations and is completely safe, I'm not installing the program on the 2nd link.



Oh yea so why is it asking for instalation rights on my security settings then?
Mactronix :)

Reply to mactronix

I used the first link and just had to install a Java app....so Hatman is wrong. You do have to install something.

------------------------------ Intel NWPD Employee. Hawthorn Farm Campus. Navy DEPer, Ship Date: 080122 (YY/MM/DD)
Reply to justinmcg67
- 0 +



My machine was nearly that, though my 8800 GTS 640 is only listed as adequate, so the bar was slighty lower. Oh well, at least its able to run.

------------------------------ Evil lurks in the databanks as it lurked in the streets of yesteryear. But it was never the streets that were evil.

Over 50. Seen it, done it, can't remember it, but I miss it.
Reply to Sailer

After I ran this, a crevasse formed between myself and my computer, probably about 2 feet wide. Just enough to catch my attention.

 

Then my computer gave me an error message (*The following web site http://www.yougamers.com/gameometer/10213/ has hurt my feelings, windows will now shut down until I feel like starting back up*)

 


Um.. for I am 1 bar away from recommended - only 1.5 gig of memory... with an 8600gt 256mb card =P


Message edited by ir_efrem on 10-13-2007 at 10:19:59 PM
Reply to ir_efrem
- 0 +

ira176 wrote :

Yeah, I tested my computer for Crysis, and It doesn't quite register everything right. It says that my X1950pro only has 256 megs, that's half true, I have two in crossfire. The test didn't recognize the crossfire cards.



I guess what I meant to say is that the gameometer doesn't register my crossfire set up. However, when the crossfire is activated, I do have a total of 512 mb of framebuffer memory between the two cards.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by ira176 on 10-14-2007 at 03:03:54 AM
Reply to ira176

ira176 wrote :

I guess what I meant to say is that the gameometer doesn't register my crossfire set up. However, when the crossfire is activated, I do have a total of 512 mb of framebuffer memory between the two cards.



No no, if you have two graphics cards in SLI or Cross Fire and both cards have 256MB of Vram you can't say you now have a 512MB frame buffer it don't work like that. Each card renders one half of the screen at 256MB and the other half at 256MB, you still have a 256MB framebuffer with both cards. Graphics cards don't run in dual channel mode, but they do work together.

------------------------------ Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.2GHz * Asus P5E * 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix Tracers * Raptor X * EVGA Geforce 8800GTX 768MB 651MHz/1525MHz/2100MHz * X-FI Fatal1ty Pro * Enermax Infiniti 720W PSU * Creative THX5.1 * Tuniq Tower 120
Silverstone TJ09 * Windows XP
Reply to systemlord

Already knew I could play Crysis.

Reply to bruce555

Haven't you guys played the beta? I've played it and on my main computer is running pretty decent on medium that's on a athlon x2 5200+, an ati radeon x1950xt and 2gb of a-data vitesta ram.

Reply to cristip60

It runs like absolute rubbish on low on my 3700 (at 2.6) x1950 pro system with 2gb RAM. That's at any resolution, even 640x480. 15-25fps average outside. In a gunfight I can get below 15.

Reply to randomizer
- 0 +

justinmcg67 wrote :

I used the first link and just had to install a Java app....so Hatman is wrong. You do have to install something.

 


mm.. well it didnt install anything on mine.

------------------------------ Na na na na na na na na HATMAN!
Reply to Hatman
- 0 +

randomizer wrote :

It runs like absolute rubbish on low on my 3700 (at 2.6) x1950 pro system with 2gb RAM. That's at any resolution, even 640x480. 15-25fps average outside. In a gunfight I can get below 15.


OUCH!!! :fou: I'm betting than my AMD 3200+ w/x1800xt 256mb would be an absolute slide show :cry:

------------------------------ PSU Tiers
GPU Power
8800gtx w/e6600 OC'd will run on Antec 380w w/27A on 12v rail, PSU!!
Reply to lunyone

lunyone wrote :

OUCH!!! :fou: I'm betting than my AMD 3200+ w/x1800xt 256mb would be an absolute slide show :cry:


Well let's put things into perspective here. My dad has 4gb RAM and vista x64. He has an E6600 @2.7 (I think) and an x800GTO overclocked to something that I don't remember. He get's consistantly better framerates than me (I'd say he gets 20fps min and averages around 35) on low settings with a higher resolution even. He just get's graphical anomolies coz the beta doesn't support SM2 cards, like cloaked guys turn white and appear through walls and terrain, and you can see them across the whole map. It's an unintentional cheat :D

Reply to randomizer
- 0 +

Thus the faster frames, because no detail is used on the character. Use that on him, the next time he says he's got a better rig!!! Hehehehehe

Reply to lunyone

STEMNIN wrote :

lol, think or know?



I tested my system and its quite a bit above the Recommended.

And by the way I have a HD2900Pro 1GB GDDR4 running the Catalyst 7.10 drivers and in 3DMark05 beat a system thats the same as mine only it has a 8800GTS 640 by about 3k.

So yea the HD2900Pro is a good card and the drivers are just now unleashing its potential.

And God has something way better than a 9800xt x3 in SLI. He has a 28000 x8 in SLI 2.0 all running on PCIe 4.0. Not to mention his 32 core CPU running at 5GHz each and 32Gigs of dual channel DDR6 and 50terabytes in a SATA5 RAID0.

Man I envy God.

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty

lunyone wrote :

Thus the faster frames, because no detail is used on the character. Use that on him, the next time he says he's got a better rig!!! Hehehehehe


It's not the point though, I should still get at least 25fps min at 1024x768 on low, gee.

Reply to randomizer

I'm pretty happy with my results. Yes folks, this is an AMD system. = P

 

http://www.yourfilehost.com/media. [...] esults.JPG

 

http://www.yourfilehost.com/media. [...] ults_2.JPG

 


Message edited by englandr753 on 10-15-2007 at 08:34:47 AM
Reply to englandr753
- 0 +

nice score

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Maziar on 10-15-2007 at 02:08:20 PM
------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar

I think dual core is a must have for crysis that's how i explain the poor performance you got.

Reply to cristip60

here is what I got:

"Game-o-Meter Result:

Either your hardware is too new, too old or too rare - we don't know enough of it to give an accurate estimation. Sorry. "

------------------------------ The Truth About GPU Power Consumption
Home: E4600@3.6Ghz|AC7|P35|4GB|640GB|8800GT|Vista64|24" P-MVA
Work: Phenom9500@2.5Ghz|AC64|690G|3GB|500GB|8600GT|XP|2x22" TN
Reply to TSIMonster
Previous
1 2 3
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Can u play Crysis? , test your rig with these 2 sites
Go to:

There are 1174 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them