Ad
News

Alienware announces desktop PC with Intel's latest quad-core processor

Published on January 11, 2007

Alienware said it "will" launch Intel's second quad-core desktop processor, the 2.4 GHz Core 2 Quad Q6600, on its Area-51 7500 desktop system. Read more

CES 2007: Intel rolls out new quad-core processor Core 2 Quad Q6600

Published on January 08, 2007

Intel is enjoying its lead in the current microprocessor market and today announced more CPUs with four cores. There are three new quad-cores altogether, one desktop processor and two chips for entry-level servers. Read more

CES 2007: Dell goes Green, introduces optional plant a tree purchase option

Published on January 09, 2007

Dell CEO Michael Dell announced that the company will be offering an inexpensive, around $2 - $6, option when buying a new computer to plant a tree which should offset the energy consumption of that machine. Read more

CES 2007: Dell shows off ceramic cooling, offers plant a tree purchase option

Published on January 09, 2007

More pun-prone journalists than I might be moved to wax lyrical about how Dell is getting into the business of selling trees... Well, not literally, but at his CES keynote this morning company CEO Michael Dell announced that the company will be offering an inexpensive, around $2 - $6, option when buying a new computer to plant a tree which should offset the energy consumption of that machine. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on January 01, 2009

We’ve built, overclocked, and tested our $625, $1,250, and $2,500 performance machines. How will these three systems compare in overall performance and value? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $2,500 Enthusiast PC

Published on December 31, 2008

We’ve seen how far a moderately priced Core i7 system can take us and now we’re ready to assess the performance advantages of better cooling and a stronger graphics configuration. Will our upgrades be worth the money? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Mid-Range PC

Published on December 30, 2008

We see how far $1,250 gets us when building a new Core i7-based system, and how it compares to last month’s similarly priced Core 2 Duo machine. Read more

SSDs Replacing HDDs Soon? Not A Chance

Published on December 29, 2008

Some say 2010 and even 2009 will be the year of SSDs. We think not. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » q6600 core temp offset concerns
 

q6600 core temp offset concerns




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : q6600 core temp offset concerns
 
Profile: newbie
More Information

I'm running a q6600 on a Abit ix38 quadgt. The processor is clocked at 3.2ghz (9x356). Temps have been 19c idle (18c ambient) and never above 38c load. My concern is that cores 0 & 1 are runnning about 9c greater than cores 2 & 3 at idle. Under load, all core temps stay within 6-8c of eachother. I do not feel this is normal but I would like some opinions :) Been trying to research CPU VTT (set @ 1.24) and CPU GTLREF (set @ 67% for both 0&2 and 1&3), exactly what do these controls do? I have found limit info but I'm still not quite sure if the CPU GTLREF is what is making the temp difference in the cores as this is the default setting in my BIOS. The "Core 2 quad and duo temperature quide" states a core offsets of up to 5c are normal for quads... I seem to be well outside that and I'm wondering if there is anything i can do about it before i try some potentially costly trial and error runs.

3.4ghz has not been stable enough for Prime95 and requires >1.4V at CPU (which makes me nervous for somereason) and much tweaking, but system runs flawlessly in Prime95 for hours at 3.2ghz with 1.35V (four instances of prime95).

To restate my initial question: Is the core temp offset a problem? what can i do to fix it? Also, what do CPU GTLREF and CPU VTT do and how are they related to eachother, if at all?

Thanks you all for your time!

EDIT: I'm using abit uGuru and SpeedFan 4.33 for all temp and voltage monitoring.


Message edited by totenkopf on 12-31-2007 at 01:47:50 AM
Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Master-de-bater
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

In another thread, someone was experiencing similar problems. Something like 11C difference under load. This could entirely be uneven contact area between the cpu and heatsink, or the difference in location of the sensors.

As long as the hotter core doesn't get to hot, I see no problems. If you are truly worried, you can lap both your cpu and heatsink. There's a guide on them here.

For your overclock, it could be your ram. Run the blend test in prime95. If it gives you error, you may need to lax timings and/or raise voltages for the ram.


---------------
"Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
Profile: newbie
More Information

I think you are probably right, evilonigiri. Perhaps the thermal grease spread more in one direction and covered some of the cores better... who knows!

I just reached a stable 3.4ghz and the hottest core reaches about 62c under full load. Heat doesn't seem to be an issue so maybe i'll just forget about it.

My ram is not the nicest stuff. I have it running just under 800Mhz @5-5-5-15 which is stock so i figure that's fine, although I did bump the voltage up a bit to help the OC... I'll tweak it down as far as i can later


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » q6600 core temp offset concerns

Go to:
 

Google Ads