Ad
News

Intel to introduce C0 stepping 915P/G chipsets in March

Published on January 03, 2005

Intel plans to introduce new versions of its 915P and 915G chipsets in March, shifting the core stepping of the ICH6 southbridge from B1 to the C0 stepping, according to market sources familiar with Intel's roadmap. Read more

Alienware announces desktop PC with Intel's latest quad-core processor

Published on January 11, 2007

Alienware said it "will" launch Intel's second quad-core desktop processor, the 2.4 GHz Core 2 Quad Q6600, on its Area-51 7500 desktop system. Read more

CES 2007: Intel rolls out new quad-core processor Core 2 Quad Q6600

Published on January 08, 2007

Intel is enjoying its lead in the current microprocessor market and today announced more CPUs with four cores. There are three new quad-cores altogether, one desktop processor and two chips for entry-level servers. Read more

Intel Releases New Midrange Chips

Published on August 12, 2008

Intel has released several new midrange processors all based on its 45nm process technology from both the Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad lines. Vendors of gaming PCs are expected to manufacture new systems based on these processors shortly. At the head of th Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: $2,500 Enthusiast PC

Published on December 31, 2008

We’ve seen how far a moderately priced Core i7 system can take us and now we’re ready to assess the performance advantages of better cooling and a stronger graphics configuration. Will our upgrades be worth the money? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Mid-Range PC

Published on December 30, 2008

We see how far $1,250 gets us when building a new Core i7-based system, and how it compares to last month’s similarly priced Core 2 Duo machine. Read more

SSDs Replacing HDDs Soon? Not A Chance

Published on December 29, 2008

Some say 2010 and even 2009 will be the year of SSDs. We think not. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

Published on December 29, 2008

Unsurprisingly, hardware prices have dropped since our System Builder Marathon last month, which means we have access to more processing power at our same $625 entry-level price point for gamers. Come check out the configuration Paul put together! Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Q6600 Stepping G0 - Temps question
 

Q6600 Stepping G0 - Temps question




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Q6600 Stepping G0 - Temps question
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Hello,

I've got a Q6600 Stepping G0 with Bigtyphoon VX 120
Also I've OC my cpu to 3.4ghz

on idle my temps are between 39-42c about 4 cores
on stress testing it can gets up to 68-72c

Is this normal?

PRIME95 for stressing and CoreTemp for temps.

thanks.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

"Hmmmmmm"
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Inproperly attached heatsink? Voltage to go to 3.4Ghz? Reattached the heatsink and if that doesn't work lap the heatsink and cpu if you need to.


---------------
It's a theater of love stories.
Profile: stranger
More Information

1.385V to CPU
I reattached in the past the heatsink few times(Intel attaching is very stupid in my opinion, even if you attach it well it still not 100% solid stick)

Anyway are the above temps not good?

Lapping will overrun my warranty right?

Purveyor of Distilled Genius
Profile: addict
More Information

I'd say those temps are perfectly fine. Everyone sweats when they get a core that goes above 65*C, for absolutely no reason. These are quads, they run hot in all but the most well ventilated setups. If you're running Prime95 for around a half hour to an hour, and your hottest core is below 75*C, you're golden. I hear so many people say "detach heatsink, reapply paste, reattach heatsink." It sounds like a broken record, and 9 times out of 10 it makes absolutely no difference, and only causes headaches for those involved.

Case in point: I just did a Q6600 build for my brother, gutted his old Falcon Northwest Fragbox, which has mediocre (at best) ventilation on the CPU side. OCed to 2.7 @ 1.175v and am getting around 50*C idle on the hottest core, and a solid 71*C on the hottest core after hours of Prime95. I'm sure a lot of the AMD guys would crap looking at those temps, but they are 100% within specs.


---------------
"Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic."
Purveyor of Distilled Genius
Profile: addict
More Information

And yes, lapping will void your warranty. There is no need to lap with the temps that you are running, period.


---------------
"Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic."
OddJob's side-kick!!
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Could alwats lap your HSF if you wanted too.

Or could attach a higher CFM fan thatll lower temps a bit more, TBH I wouldn't have it that high what JJBlanche says is true but it can still reduce lifespan and out of 3400mhz and 3000mhz you likely wont notice any difference at all.

Thats just me though, mine runs at 55 at max possible temp.


---------------
Na na na na na na na na HATMAN!
Purveyor of Distilled Genius
Profile: addict
More Information

CPUs from the factory are rated to run anywhere from 10 to 15 years at stock settings. We all know no one runs their procs that long. Even the most vicious over-clock/over-volt (say, 3.6 GHz/1.5v on a Q6600) would only take about 20% to 30% off the life of the CPU. That's still 7 years...5 if you want to be a real pessimist. To date, I've never run a performance oriented CPU for more than 3-4 years.


---------------
"Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic."

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Q6600 Stepping G0 - Temps question

Go to:
 

Google Ads