6000+ X2 vs E4400

jhyukkang

Distinguished
Sep 1, 2007
562
0
18,980
hellow
im choosing between those 2 and not planning to overclock. cus i dont play a lots of high ended games.
so with stock speed and FSB
which one is better?
i know 6000+ has 3.0Ghz and e4400 has 2.0Ghz. is there big difference between those two??(like in games can you feel the differences??)
 

firetatoo

Distinguished
Jan 18, 2007
187
0
18,680


not true.
the 6000+ comes with a heatsink.
do not believe the lies.

it is the 6400+ that has no heatsink.

here are the specs for the 6000+ from newegg:

Model
Brand AMD
Processors Type Desktop
Series Athlon 64 X2
Model ADX6000CZBOX
CPU Socket Type
CPU Socket Type Socket AM2
Tech Spec
Core Windsor
Multi-Core Dual-Core
Name Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Operating Frequency 3.0GHz
HT 2000MHz
L1 Cache 128KB+128KB
L2 Cache 2 x 1MB
Manufacturing Tech 90 nm
64 bit Support Yes
Hyper-Transport Support Yes
Virtualization Technology Support Yes
Multimedia Instruction MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNOW! Professional
Voltage 1.35-1.4V
Cooling Device Heatsink and Fan included
Manufacturer Warranty
Parts 3 years limited
Labor 3 years limited


the heatsink works fine too.
right now it idles at 35c.
 

Grimmy

Splendid
Feb 20, 2006
4,431
0
22,780
In my opinion, the 6000+ would have better performance.

But to really feel the difference? Well.. that would more depend on the video card.

If having better benchmarks score matters more, and you don't want OC involved, then the 6000+ would be the choice to get.

I'm using a E4400, and very happy with it. It's OC to 2.8 for now, and handles pretty well for 125 bucks. :D . o O (but dats what OC is all about)