Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Nvidia > 8800GT specs from Foxconn site. Dare I say official?

8800GT specs from Foxconn site. Dare I say official?

Forum Graphic & Displays : Nvidia - 8800GT specs from Foxconn site. Dare I say official?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Saw this on another forum:
http://www.foxconnchannel.com/prod [...] us0000048#

So I think this is as official as it gets other than from nVidia.

And the 8800GT is a g96 and not a g92 :)

Specs from page

Quote :

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 8800GT
Core: G96
CoreClock: 600MHz
Pixel Pipeline:
Vertex Pipeline:
RAMDACs: 400MHz
Memory Type: GDDR3
Memory Size: 512MB
Memory Clock: 1800MHz
Memory Interface: 256bit
Graphics Bus Technology: PCI Express x16, Gen 2.0
Cooler: Fansink
Connectors: DL DVI-I + DL DVI-I + HDTV
Special Features: Full DirectX 10 Shader Model 4.0 Support
PCI Express 2.0
Full HDCP Support
16x Anti-aliasing Technology
128-bit High Dynamic-Range Lighting
Essential for Windows Vistaâ„¢




And it appears like they are for sale at around $250 price point!!

Not sure how good these sources are though:
[url]http://www.google.com/products?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=s&hl=en&q=8800GT&um=1&ie=UTF-8[/url]

Ignore the 1st reference in the about google search. It is actually a GTS 320mb for sale at ~$350.00 on ebay. Good luck to that dude.


Message edited by SpeedyVV on 10-18-2007 at 11:32:15 PM
------------------------------ Ultra Gladiator Case| Q6600 @ 3.24 ghz | Zalman 9700 NT | eVGA 680i SLI | 2Gb Corsair TWINX PC6400 | WD Raptor 150 |2 x WD CaviarSE16 500 | Ultra X3-1000W | EVGA 8800GTX @ 625/1000 | XFX 7600GT XXX @ 727/866 | Dell 3007WFP-HC + 2x 2007FPs | Logitech G25
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

I would say that looks pretty credible, and that card looks about as fruity as you could ever possibly get. they might have well just slapped a teletubbies turd on it.

Reply to 08nwsula
- 0 +

Yep thats official, Foxconn are official nvidia parteners. But it doesn't reveal anything new unfortunately, most important thing is the number of stream processors.


Message edited by Hatman on 10-19-2007 at 12:04:37 AM
------------------------------ Na na na na na na na na HATMAN!
Reply to Hatman

The G96 thing really has me interested with this. Now it makes me wonder what the G92 is going to be. I'm pretty sure that they're just going to unlock a few shaders and call it a G92. Very interested and looking forward to see what comes of it.

Reply to bruce555

Or will the GT be the G96 and the update for the GTS 640 be G92? So many possibilities. All we can do is speculate.


My that is one fruity card foxconn has there.

------------------------------ LAPTOP: Sager NP5760|T7200|2gb DDR2-667| 100gb 7200rpm HDD| 512mb 7950GTX|17'' WUXGA

Desktop: Core2 E7200 | Corsair 2gb DDR2-800 | Gigabyte EP35-DS3L | 250gb Seagate Barracuda | MSI GTX260 (192 SP) | Corsair VX550 | Antec 300 case
Reply to lostandwandering
- 0 +

what were the heatsink painters smokin when they designed the thing? or maybe the hole where the fan is has a second meaning...


Message edited by pidesd on 10-19-2007 at 12:49:52 AM
Reply to pidesd

lol, I can't believe you just went there.

------------------------------ LAPTOP: Sager NP5760|T7200|2gb DDR2-667| 100gb 7200rpm HDD| 512mb 7950GTX|17'' WUXGA

Desktop: Core2 E7200 | Corsair 2gb DDR2-800 | Gigabyte EP35-DS3L | 250gb Seagate Barracuda | MSI GTX260 (192 SP) | Corsair VX550 | Antec 300 case
Reply to lostandwandering

folks behave!!!!

I initially thought the picture was a fake because, of the design, but I went to foxconn, and it is consistent with the other 8800 cards.

BTW, hatman says this looks legit, so pleeeeeaaaseeee dont turn this into another speculation thread.

Go ahead and start a "G96==8800GT, means G92==8900" thread somewhere else.

Just kidding :kaola: I say we get a 1 teraflop high end GPU before x'mas!!! At least I want one from eVGA so I can stepUp to it :sol:

------------------------------ Ultra Gladiator Case| Q6600 @ 3.24 ghz | Zalman 9700 NT | eVGA 680i SLI | 2Gb Corsair TWINX PC6400 | WD Raptor 150 |2 x WD CaviarSE16 500 | Ultra X3-1000W | EVGA 8800GTX @ 625/1000 | XFX 7600GT XXX @ 727/866 | Dell 3007WFP-HC + 2x 2007FPs | Logitech G25
Reply to SpeedyVV

Well the link no longer works so they must have removed it. Maybe they got the specs wrong :kaola:

Reply to randomizer

randomizer wrote :

Well the link no longer works so they must have removed it. Maybe they got the specs wrong :kaola:



I have a feeling that nVidia got wind off it, and gave them a call :lol:

Or maybe someone in the Web Hosting department is getting a good smacking right now, for not being able to tell the diff between staging server and production server.

Or most likely, they did it on purpose. Nothing like a little teaser.

Reply to SpeedyVV

I still don't believe the G96 part, I reckon it's a typo, but probably deliberate from Nvidia to see how much the public are anticipating this thing. Just google "foxconn 8800gt" and see how much this got around.

Reply to randomizer
- 0 +

that 250$ price tag sure did look good!

------------------------------ AMD Dual Core Opteron 175 @ 2.2ghz(Stock)
Asus A8N-E(socket 939 Nvidia Nforce 4 Ultra)
Galaxy Geforce 8800gt 512mb
2GB DDR 400(1Gbx2) Transcend
Reply to sunny27

I believe the g96 part. if you think about it...

ATI is supposedly releasing the new 3 serries, so nvidia has to respond to that. since nvidia had suck a lead already, they prolly will do the GT, and an 8800 gs/gtx refresh

Reply to eternallydead

Will PCIE 2.0 be able to downclock itself and run on PCIE 1.0?

Reply to BatCommander64
- 0 +

Yes - PCIE 1.0 cards will be able to run on PCIE 2.0 boards

Reply to ethel
- 0 +

Quote :

Yes - PCIE 1.0 cards will be able to run on PCIE 2.0 boards



Yeah but can a PCIE 2.0 card run in a PCIE 1.0 board?

Reply to physx7
- 0 +
------------------------------ E7200 @ 2.53Ghz, 2 gigs Mushkin ddr2 800, Gigabyte EP45-UD3R, Western Digital 640 gig, Gigabyte HD 4850 512MB, Asus DVD burner, HP w2007 monitor...
http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm282/alphahuman98/masterchiefdancing_4-1.gif

 

Reply to physx7

- 0 +

eternallydead wrote :

I believe the g96 part. if you think about it...

 

ATI is supposedly releasing the new 3 serries, so nvidia has to respond to that. since nvidia had suck a lead already, they prolly will do the GT, and an 8800 gs/gtx refresh


There is no g96, tahts the point, there was g92 aka 8800gt and g98 which was a very low end part.

  



 


Both are backwards compatible with eachother, in either case it runs at PCI-E bandwidth.

------------------------------ Na na na na na na na na HATMAN!
Reply to Hatman

No, it's only backwards compatible.

Reply to nickr336

PCIE 2.0 Cards will work in PCIE 1.0 Slots.

The only drawback is they will clearly be limited by PCIE 1.0 Bandwidth.
For initial PCIE 2.0 Cards that will not be an issue.

At some future time, it may be an issue.

Reply to zenmaster
- 0 +

PCI-E 2 cards will work in PCI-E motherboards:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mainb [...] 93804.html
Note that these limitations have been revealed only for the Blitz mainboard series that uses CrossLinx chip. Other Asus mainboards on Intel P35 chipset should have no problems with PCI Express 2.0 graphics cards support.

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar
- 0 +

meh, i just got a new system, ill skip 2.0 and go 3.0 in 2009.

------------------------------ http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/4645/sig1xl2.jpg
Reply to STEMNIN

I guess Foxconn took down the webpage. Did it confirm the 112 Stream Processors?

------------------------------ Old Enermax Case G. Skill DDR2 1000mhz 4gb(2x2gb)
PC Power & Cooling 610 Silencer EVGA 8800GT 512mb
Gigabyte P35-DS3R 2x WD1600AAJS RAID0
Intel Core 2 Duo e8400 @3.6ghz Windows Vista Premium 64bit
Reply to jwolf24601
- 0 +

Unfortunatly no, still waiting on that :(

------------------------------ Na na na na na na na na HATMAN!
Reply to Hatman
- 0 +

nickr336 wrote :

No, it's only backwards compatible.

 


Thats exactly the same thing. Either will work in any combination.

 

PCI-E2 mobo and card will run at PCI-E2 bandwidth.

 

PCI-E1 card and PCI-E2 mobo will run at PCI-E1.

 

PCI-E2 card and PCI-E1 mobo will run PCI-E1.

 

Simple as.

 


------------------------------ Na na na na na na na na HATMAN!
Reply to Hatman

Is there a big performance hit from a PCIE 2 card in a PCIE 1 slot?

Reply to BatCommander64

BatCommander64 wrote :

Is there a big performance hit from a PCIE 2 card in a PCIE 1 slot?



Yes!! PCI-Express 1.0 is has a transfer speed of 8GB/s, while PCI-Express has a transfer rate of 16GB/s. PCI-Express 2.0 is also backwards compatible.

------------------------------ Intel NWPD Employee. Hawthorn Farm Campus. Navy DEPer, Ship Date: 080122 (YY/MM/DD)
Reply to justinmcg67

Is there a HUGE framerate drop or something?

Reply to BatCommander64

BatCommander64 wrote :

Is there a HUGE framerate drop or something?



I would imagine so. I mean when you cut the transfer rates in half, that can't really be a good thing.

Reply to aadamszc
- 0 +

What? What a load of bull, there wont be hardly any difference at all!

Cards as it is only JUST ABOUT use mroe then the 8x bandwidth, and thats only for some things with high end cards like 8800gts. Cards like 1950pro dont show any difference even at 4x bandwidth.

Aside from taht proof, there currently aren't any pci-e2 mobo's and pci-e2 card reviews available to prove it otherwise.

For a while it will be same performance w/e you do.

------------------------------ Na na na na na na na na HATMAN!
Reply to Hatman

I stand corrected. In my defense, it was all speculation on my part. I don't consider myself the resident expert( ore really halfway decent) on graphic cards, or anything for that matter.

Reply to aadamszc
- 0 +

lol dw about it, im far from anything to do with expert :D

------------------------------ Na na na na na na na na HATMAN!
Reply to Hatman

There will be ZERO performance hit with the initial PCIE-2 Cards.

The reason is that the current top end cards to not come close to bottlenecking on PCIE-1. The PCIE-2 Cards will need to become SIGNIFICANTLY faster to bottleneck in the PCIE-1 slot. The initial PCIE-2 cards will only be minimally faster if faster at all.

(The 8800GT will actually be slower than the 8800GTX. ATIs 2950 if it is even PCIE-2, is not expected to be a revolutionary card.)

Reply to zenmaster
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Nvidia > 8800GT specs from Foxconn site. Dare I say official?
Go to:

There are 676 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
  • 01:00 raulkm won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 letus won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 pmiddy won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 MarcieMark won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 kaypeezee won the Uniformed badge
  • 04:06 xyz001 won the Sophmore badge
  • 01:00 scione won the Freshman badge
  • 01:32 aford10 won the Home Brew badge
  • 01:00 Kevinator won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 adis won the Uniformed badge