I run my games at 1440x900 with EVERYTHING maxed out on HL2, CS:S, Bioshock no problems. 202 CS:S stress test score.
The 4000+ is not a bad proc, overclock that bad boy, hopefully you have good RAM, DDR has dried up. I've seen my DDR500 ram on ebay, but at $200USD for 2x1GB.
The Opteron's kick @$$, I overclocked my 165 from 1.8 stock to 2.7 no problems. Sisoft Sandra rates exactly to an FX-60 dual core, I don't even think I would bottle neck a GTX, and if I did, it wouldn't be by much.
I have a 939 4000+ right now, overclocked from stock 2.4 to 2.85 ghz. Paired with a 7900gt, I can play all my games like bioshock,fear,hitman, stranglehold etc on 1440 x 900 resolution and high settings. Im thinking about getting a 8800gts so imagine how much of a boost in fps that would give.
------------------------------Intel will not take the top spot, or probably the top 3 spot back for the forseeable future. Not even with 32nm and more cores will intel be able to beat Jaguar. - JennyH the AMDiot, Nov 2009
Reply to yomamafor1
My old P4 3GHz was bottlenecking my 7800GTX, so yes it is bigtime! When I first played Doom 3 on my P4 3GHz + 7800GTX I couldn't run any AA or run ultra texture quality, but now that I have my Core 2 E6600 @3.7GHz I can run 8xAA and run ultra quality textures.
------------------------------Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.2GHz * Asus P5E * 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix Tracers * Raptor X * EVGA Geforce 8800GTX 768MB 651MHz/1525MHz/2100MHz * X-FI Fatal1ty Pro * Enermax Infiniti 720W PSU * Creative THX5.1 * Tuniq Tower 120
Silverstone TJ09 * Windows XP
Reply to systemlord
it wont by much. especially considering most games can still take full advantage of only one core, and even then, the performance improvement from 1 to 2 or more cores isnt huge for gaming yet, youll still be limited by the gpu most times, unless you turn your resolution and details down. then your max fps will be limited by the cpu more.
otherwise, again, no.
@systemlord... a P4 at 3.0 is only going to be fast enough to run smoothly at lower settings as you saw, since its performance is noticably lower than a 2.4 4000+. a P4 3.0 is more or less on par with a s462 3000+ @ 2.0 that a relative has (which is also poor for gaming), since they were released around the same time too.
to give an example, the X2 3800+ i have, is still fast enough to play older and newer games pretty easily, @ stock even (my 7800GT 256 is beginning to be overwhelmed a bit though). the biggest improvement however, is going to be in the amount of memory the OP has, if the OP has less than 2GB of ram, then thatll end up being a problem for gaming most times now, much more than their cpu will be.
Message edited by choirbass on 10-09-2007 at 11:54:07 AM
I forgot to take into account that ID's engine (Doom 3) is bound by the processer more than the graphics card, which is why Quake Wars is easy to run on most systems.
Message edited by systemlord on 10-09-2007 at 12:16:10 PM
------------------------------Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.2GHz * Asus P5E * 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix Tracers * Raptor X * EVGA Geforce 8800GTX 768MB 651MHz/1525MHz/2100MHz * X-FI Fatal1ty Pro * Enermax Infiniti 720W PSU * Creative THX5.1 * Tuniq Tower 120
Silverstone TJ09 * Windows XP
Reply to systemlord
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.