HamSteak :
file size and what the server is doing is pretty irrelevant to my question.
If you truly believe that then you have a gross misunderstanding of how servers work. What the server is doing is at the very core of designing the system for performance.
In summary:
1. A development system has very little need for the extreme edge of performance. That should be done with the production system.
2. RAID 0 on a server is useless and detrimental. The purpose of RAID is availability, and maximizing IOPs for certain applications. RAID 0 is not redundant, decreases availability, and doesn't gain you any performance in the server environment over RAID 5.
3. Disk subsystem throughput is pretty irrelevant for most servers because the network connections are the bottleneck. Windows XP/Vista/2003 can't transfer data at more than about 35 MB/sec over Gigabit Ethernet, Linux and Windows Server 2008 can manage only about 65 MB/sec. If your disk subsystem is faster, that's good for concurrent users, but much beyond 100-120 MB/sec doesn't do anyone any good because you've maxed out your network connections (assuming 2x-4x link aggregation). There are exceptions where a server is doing a high throughput task locally, such as DVD multiplexing or perhaps other video stream related tasks, but those situations are rare. If you run into a situation where a service needs to server more than 100-120MB/sec to concurrent users, it's time to do a server farm with a load balancer.
4. If you're interested in extreme performance, the ICH9R is not a realistic solution. That's consumer-level equipment, and its inadequate for server-related high performance uses.
5. 7200 RPM SATA drives are generally regarded as consumer equipment. 10,000 RPM SATA drives are somewhat better, but all SATA drives are laid to waste by SAS drives in server performance.
6. A single RAID array is not what will get extreme database performance. High transactions-per-second databases need separate arrays for the data and transaction log files, each configured with a different RAID configuration.
7. High end RAID controllers with high amounts of onboard cache are required for high database performance.
If you are unaware of these things and believe that simplifying your server design down to RAID 0 on SATA drives is going to net you high performance, think again. This is a server you're building, not a Crysis/BF2 machine.
But anyway, you seem to know exactly what you want and how to build it, so I'm not sure why you even started the thread in the first place. My advice would be to go build your server the way you want to do it and be happy, and stop asking questions since you don't want to listen to the answers.