Q6600 @ 3.24 with 1.3v (Bios) any good?

Forum Overclocking : CPUs - Q6600 @ 3.24 with 1.3v (Bios) any good?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

i have my Q6600 running @ 3.24 stable 1.3v (Bios) 1.25-1.26 actual, Temps- idle 40 prime load 61,
bit confused as most people seem to be pumping more voltage into their Q's?

------------------------------ Maximus Formula | Q6600 G0 @ 3.4ghz | T.R.U.E.
8800GT(700/1750/950)HR-03 GT | 4gb Dominator 1066 555-15 | Corsair HX620
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

If it's stable on that voltage: Shut up and enjoy. :D

------------------------------ Which Chip? Well, it depends on which set of thieving b@stardz you choose to support: The ones who use insider trading to enrich themselves while running their company into the ground? Or the ones who illegally pay vendors to not support the first group?
Reply to Scotteq

If its stable @ that voltage, then keep it, also the temps are fine too
my E6600 is @ 3.24 with 1.3 voltage and its stable and also my idle temp is 41-43 and load temp(100% CPU usage) is 63

------------------------------ Q6600@3.4+ TT V1 Cooler,SAPPHIRE HD 4870X2,ASUS MAXIMUS FORMULA,4GB OCZ DDR2 800,LG W2452V 1920x1200
Reply to Maziar

Nice overclock........

What are you using to test stability?

Just wondering because a gut who thought he had a crazy overclock with extremely low temps had his CPU at 25% load and testing only 2 cores on Orthos

------------------------------ Antec 1200|Antec Signature 850w|Asus Maximus II Formula|Q9650|4GB Dominator 1066|EVGA 9800GX2
Reply to Silverion77

prime 95 .25 version, all 4 cores 100% load, 61 degrees hottest core.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by goodie on 01-12-2008 at 04:23:37 PM
------------------------------ Maximus Formula | Q6600 G0 @ 3.4ghz | T.R.U.E.
8800GT(700/1750/950)HR-03 GT | 4gb Dominator 1066 555-15 | Corsair HX620
Reply to goodie

goodie wrote :

prime 95 .25 version, all 4 cores 100% load, 61 degrees hottest core.




For how long.

------------------------------ TeamBAG Member
Reply to cnumartyr

8hrs small ftt & 8hrs blend

------------------------------ Maximus Formula | Q6600 G0 @ 3.4ghz | T.R.U.E.
8800GT(700/1750/950)HR-03 GT | 4gb Dominator 1066 555-15 | Corsair HX620
Reply to goodie

My Q6600 was reporting very similar numbers to those at 3.4. At FSB 377, it needed 1.325 (BIOS) for stability (1.28 full load CPU-Z). Temps were at 57*C.

It starts to become more power-hungry at and beyond 3.45 GHz. Currently, I have it 400 FSB and 1.43125v BIOS (1.408 and 1.376 idle and full load respectively, CPU-Z, with full load occasionally flipping up to 1.392 and back down to 1.376 while running large FFTs). 17 hours small FFTs stable. Working on large FFTs now. Temps are at 63*C.

It gave a Prime error at 1.4125 BIOS at 400 FSB. Bumped it three notches to the final 1.43125 (BIOS), just to be extra certain (and also because CPU-Z was not showing me a bump in voltage until I went to 1.43125).

The point of all this rambling is that I'm confident your chip can go to 3.6 as well. I'm more or less convinced that the latest G0's are very efficient processors. My brother has one running at 2.7 GHz and 1.175 BIOS (1.08 CPU-Z), which is notably lower than stock voltage.

------------------------------ "Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic."
Reply to JJBlanche

I am a total noob when it comes to overclocking... But I do have a question about my Q6600...

I use the striker extreme mobo. I just have the auto overclock from Asus set to 15%. I used the PC Probe and it give me a warning about my CPU VTT which is 1.38.

Should i be worried abuot that voltage? My idle temps are in the high 20's and under load it only like 35-39c.

Reply to slidai

No, I would not worry about it at all. It may be giving you a warning because the intel "max voltage" is listed at 1.35v. However, I have a feeling intel specifies it at that voltage because their crappy included heatsink can only handle voltages that high.

Regardless, your mobo is probably overvolting the thing, they always do. What frequency are you running? Do yourself a favor and check out the Q6600 overclocking guide here on the overclocking forums. It's very easy to go into BIOS and manually OC. You end up with a far more efficient OC that way.

------------------------------ "Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic."
Reply to JJBlanche

auto overclocks DO tend to overvolt, best start reading up on setting your own cpu vcore & FSB etc...

------------------------------ Maximus Formula | Q6600 G0 @ 3.4ghz | T.R.U.E.
8800GT(700/1750/950)HR-03 GT | 4gb Dominator 1066 555-15 | Corsair HX620
Reply to goodie

CPU VTT <> CPU vCore.

Intel vCore on the Box is 1.35 Max, on the site is 1.5.

CPU VTT max is 1.55 or 1.6v
CPU PLL max is 1.55 or 1.6v

Can't remember which is which. 1.38 is fine. 1.3 or 1.2 is stock (can't remember).

------------------------------ TeamBAG Member
Reply to cnumartyr

cnumartyr wrote :


Can't remember which is which. 1.38 is fine. 1.3 or 1.2 is stock (can't remember).


i got mine stable @3.0ghz using 1.225v (bios) 1.18v actual?

------------------------------ Maximus Formula | Q6600 G0 @ 3.4ghz | T.R.U.E.
8800GT(700/1750/950)HR-03 GT | 4gb Dominator 1066 555-15 | Corsair HX620
Reply to goodie

Nice OC. Real low voltage.

There's this thing called vdroop so the actual voltage is lower than the VID.

------------------------------ "Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
Reply to Evilonigiri

Goodie: I'm talking about CPU VTT. CPU VTT is NOT CPU vCore. CPU VTT is also known as FSB Termination Voltage. It has to do with the signalling on the motherboard.

And almost Evilonigiri. :P

vDroop = Idle to Load voltage droop.
vDrop = BIOS to Windows (also known as vOffset).

Atleast I think the Drop is what you were referencing. Unless you are talking about droop preventing a spike over the VID. Which is also what drop is there for because it will spike after heavy load to idle.

------------------------------ TeamBAG Member
Reply to cnumartyr

Yea I will def read up on the Q6600 guide. I wanna get to like 3 or 3.1.

Reply to slidai

If you have decent hardware, you can get farther than 3.1

------------------------------ "Contrariwise," continued Tweedledee, "if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic."
Reply to JJBlanche

Never knew there was a vdrop :P

But yeah I was referring to the droop to prevent the voltage going higher than the VID. Works both ways doesn't it. :D

------------------------------ "Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
Reply to Evilonigiri

Evilonigiri wrote :

Never knew there was a vdrop :P

But yeah I was referring to the droop to prevent the voltage going higher than the VID. Works both ways doesn't it. :D




Lol, there's too much stuff to know it all!

But yea.. VID is the max spec set in BIOS, offset brings that down to idle levels so that when it spikes after heavy load to idle it won't go over VID. Vdroop drops it below vOffset level so that it won't spike from the offset point over the VID... Haha.. It gets confusing.

------------------------------ TeamBAG Member
Reply to cnumartyr
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Overclocking > CPUs > Q6600
Go to:

There are 1094 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them