Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Upgraded from FX-55 to X2 6000
 

Upgraded from FX-55 to X2 6000




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Upgraded from FX-55 to X2 6000
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Decided to just upgrade my AMD machine for now instead of springing for a new high end intel box.

 

I went from a FX-55 to a X2 6000 and from ddr-400 memory to ddr2-800 memory.

 

My machine specs:

 

X2 6000 cpu
nvidia 7900gto 512mb agp graphics card
2gb ddr2-800 memory
thermaltake 430w power supply
etc

 

The results:
> Saw about 18% gain in mp3 encoding
> Saw about 100% gain in multi thread benchmarks
> Saw about 0% gain in gaming benchmarks

 

I do play Quake4 which is multi threaded but didn't notice any fps gain
Both Unreal tourney 3 and Crysis that release in about a month are multi threaded as well, so we shall see.

 

Conclusion, i spent close to $300 on the upgrade, X2 6000 $160, Memory $70, Heatsink $40, Expansion Board $40
and saw really no gain in single threaded applications or games. Probably would have been better to spend the money on a 8800gts 320mb video card but oh well.

 

Also notice the stock cooler that comes with the X2 6000 is a little louder than my old 3rd party heatsink, i couldn't use the new 3rd party heatsink i bought because the bracket wouldn't fit around the cpu mount.

 

Any comments welcome.

 

TC


Message edited by tcman41 on 10-16-2007 at 04:34:51 PM
Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: old hand
More Information

My machine spec is as follows:

AMD Socket 939 4000+ Single Core
Nvidia 8800GTS 320MB
2GB DDR 400
Thermaltake 500W power supply

I've upgraded my graphics card from a 6600GT to the 8800GTS and saw major improvements in my gameplay framerates.

Did you install the dual core patch for Quake 4? Would've thought that you'd at least see some improvement with the dual core cpu.




Profile: member
More Information

what you need to do is run your anti-virus and anti-spyware and seti@home and then play your games. the overhead for multiple apps is where i notice the diff.
also
drop your multiplier from 15 to 14 and raise the fsb to 214.
still 3.0ghz but now ddr2-856.

mine 6000+
7950gt 256
2gb wintec Ampx
works power 450w PSU.


---------------
To comfort the afflicted, to afflict the comfortable.
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

I really like posts like this one... not asking for help... just sharing useful, detailed information. Kudos!

Non-conformity for non-conformity's sake is confor
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

I did a similar thing with my 939 board going from a 3700 to a X2 4600 and the difference isn't that great, but I upgraded my graphics card to a 1950pro from a 7600GT and that upgrade was definitely worth it, also 2 gigs of ram is definitely better than one.

Profile: old hand
More Information

Well i think in crysis it will make a big difference, cause rumor has it that, for once, a game will support multithreading.

Sailing in my Dreams
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

I'm surprized that you didn't find any increase in gaming, but then again, the FX55 was a fairly good CPU and the 6000+ is not that much better, if any, when it comes to stock clock speeds. While there are few games that presently take advantage of multicore CPUs, some are around and if you tried them, you should make considerable gains. Another thing is that as good as your present video card is, a newer, faster model would give a far better result. I have seen it many times, and have had it happen to myself, that changing a CPU doesn't change game speed all that much, but changing to a better video card gives great improvements in games.

By the way, if you haven't done so already, install the patches for multicore CPU. I'm assuming that you didn't change the OS when your changed the board and CPU, so the OS may still be using coding that does not utilize the multicore CPU. One thing for sure, your change to an AM2 X2 system will help in a lot of things, not just gaming. Like I often have a game going and am running other applications at the same time without any performance hit, which I would get in my old single core machine.


---------------
Evil lurks in the databanks as it lurked in the streets of yesteryear. But it was never the streets that were evil.

Over 50. Seen it, done it, can't remember it.
Profile: stranger
More Information

Thanks guys:

Didn't know about a dual core patch for Quake4, no i don't have it installed so i will go out tonight and get it. I am also benchmarking quake4 via timed demos in the game, are these multi-threaded by nature as well?

I am still running windows xp 32bit, i didn't know that there is any dual core patches for this either, so i will have to look into that.

I know that the multi core will help in other areas such as multi tasking and music/video encoding but i expected perhaps a bit better performance on the gaming side. Thing was i couldn't find any gaming benchmarks on the web comparing a fx-55 to an x2 6000 so perhaps i should have stayed with what i had. I wasn't going for the big video card upgrade this time, just a simple $300 upgrade for now.

TC

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

It's possible that your games are GPU bottlenecked, because you should see atleast some difference in benchmarks... the 6000+ is a full 400MHz faster, that is not phenomenal but it is also not insignificant. Try the dual core patch, also see if you can get a hold of a game like Supreme Commander which really takes advantage of 2 cores.

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

sealboy,

beat me to it. If your gaming benchmarks stayed static, your video card is very likely the bottleneck depending on your in game settings.

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

Your video card is pretty good right now.

Use RivaTuner and OC a little bit ;)

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

As you figured out, your games are NOT bottlenecking the cpu. Most games don't. Getting quake 4 to run on multiple cards will NOT increase it's speed simply because it doesn't need it. Something like Microsoft Flight similator will benefit from the cpu and other similar games. Haven't seen enough benchmarks on the newer games to see if they bottleneck cpus. Crysis, however, i've seen really stress the crap out of the video card.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Check you have dual core anabled in the Q4 GUI,or enter the setting useSMP"1" in you cfg.
You certainly should be getting a big fps increase using a dual core,i do and so do the rest of my clan.


Go to:
 
  Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Upgraded from FX-55 to X2 6000

Google Ads
Ad
News

AMD releases new consumer flagship processor X2 6000+

Published on February 20, 2007

A few months late, AMD today fired up the latest and likely last performance stage for its 90 nm Athlon 64 X2 processor with Windsor core. The new 6000+ model is clocked at 3 GHz and represents a consumer-focused socket AM2 version of the FX-74 enthusiast processor that is based on the socket 1207FX. Read more

Windows Live Local and Ask upgrade maps

Published on March 01, 2006

Along with the launch of the new Ask.com yesterday, the company introduced an upgraded mapping product that now looks very much like Google Local and Windows Live Local. Read more

Revised Dell XPS 700 to feature overclocked Intel Core 2 Extreme CPU

Published on July 13, 2006

On the day Intel announces Conroe - which is expected within days - Dell Computer will upgrade its top-of-the-line XPS 700 desktop computer model to offer not only an overclocked Core 2 Extreme CPU, but also the option of two Nvidia GeForce 7900 GTX cards in SLI mode. This news comes straight from Chairman Michael Dell, who posed for pictures beside his team's new baby. Read more

JVC Shows Path To Super Hi-Vision Device At 17x HD Resolution

Published on May 02, 2008

Tokyo (Japan) - There is a slight chance that we may be running out of appropriate terms to describe next generation of high-resolution displays. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Best Video Cards For The Money: Oct '08

Published on October 06, 2008

Detailed graphics card specifications and reviews are great—that is, if you have the time to do the research. At the end of the day, what a gamer needs is the best graphics card within a certain budget, and that’s what we’re going to show you. Read more

Atom, Athlon, or Nano? Energy-Savers Compared

Published on October 03, 2008

We compared Intel’s Atom 230 and VIA’s Nano L2100 processors hoping to find the best product for low-power applications. VIA is in the vanguard of performance. Is this enough to beat Atom? Read more

Interview: Bigfoot's Killer NIC, Exposed

Published on October 02, 2008

Since its release, the Killer NIC has garnered a reputation for being an extravagant and largely unnecessary add-on for the do-it-yourselfer. Seeking additional insight, we approached the card's designer. Read more

Seagate's 1.5TB Barracuda: Bigger And Better?

Published on October 02, 2008

Seagate is the first hard drive vendor to offer a 1.5 TB drive in the 3.5” form factor. Meanwhile, WD sent us its RAID Edition 3 (RE3) drive. We tell you which is the best HDD choice today. Read more