Tom's Hardware > Forum > Overclocking > General Discussions > A weird problem I am having with my overclock

A weird problem I am having with my overclock

Forum Overclocking : General Discussions - A weird problem I am having with my overclock

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

My components are:

Asus Maximus Formula Mobo
E6750 processor
4gb (2 x 2gb) OCZ Reaper PC6400
Zalman 9700 CPU Fan
2 x HD3870's in crossfire
Stacker 832 case with 6 120mm fans

I basically followed the overclocking guide graysky wrote and am very happy with the results. I loosened the memory timing to 5-5-5-15 and brought the chip up to 450 fsb x 8 for a 3.6 total (very happy). I work as a software release manager so I ran many a load test after each incremental backup (17-24 hours each with prime95). I had set the dram voltage to 2.1v as per the instructions on the ram but kept the rest of the volts set to auto while overclocking. After I was stable at 3.6ghz I started fine tuning the volts

1st problem

I ended up OCing the RAM to 900mhz to run in a 1:1 ratio. I cannot seem to get the timings back to 4-4-4-15 now. Is this expected with the overclock? Does it have to run looser now because it is clocked higher?

Problem 2 (the weird part)

It appears that the mobo I have greatly overestimates it's voltages for some things. I looked through ASUS's tool and saw that it set the NB at 1.6v and it was running at aroun 54 degs. That was very high. The other things I saw that were really high was cpu pll volt (1.66v) and FSB Term (1.55v). I lowered the volts manually to:

vcore 1.36525v
cpu pll volt 1.5v
NB 1.41v
FSB term 1.4v

I stress tested these with prime95 the whole time and I can run a test for 24 hours without a crash.

The weird part

If I look at the progress of prime after 17 or so hours it looks like core 0 is running the test much faster than core 1. If the times are correct core 1 is about 2-3 hours behind core 0. What would cause this because it was not the case before I changed the NB, cpu pll volt and FSB term. My complete guess is the FSB term as it may be limiting the flow of data to the second core but I am not sure. Is this even a problem? Tests don't fail just surprised about the results.

Any help would be greatly appreciated

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

I dont know about problems 2 and 3

But for the Ram depending on overclocking potential youll have to loosen timings with increased clocks

------------------------------ Antec 1200|Antec Signature 850w|Asus Maximus II Formula|Q9650|4GB Dominator 1066|EVGA 9800GX2
Reply to Silverion77

If it didn't fail I think you are just reading way too far into it.

It's probable something else was going on. Do you have an anti-virus or anything at all that is automated that runs at certain times?

ANY load that takes away from Prime95 will slow it down.

------------------------------ TeamBAG Member
Reply to cnumartyr

No antivirus but I did have Everest running which may have taken something away

Reply to cryptics

cryptics wrote :

No antivirus but I did have Everest running which may have taken something away



Even a 1% load on a single core taking away from Prime95 over time will cause them to not run at the same speed through the test. Especially after 17 hours.

------------------------------ TeamBAG Member
Reply to cnumartyr

cnumartyr wrote :

Even a 1% load on a single core taking away from Prime95 over time will cause them to not run at the same speed through the test. Especially after 17 hours.


Does that include moving your mouse around frantically?

------------------------------ "Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
Reply to Evilonigiri

Evilonigiri wrote :

Does that include moving your mouse around frantically?



In theory... probably. But I doubt it would cause enough to be noticeable. :kaola:

------------------------------ TeamBAG Member
Reply to cnumartyr

cnumartyr wrote :

In theory... probably. But I doubt it would cause enough to be noticeable. :kaola:


My friend's old P4 spiked to 70% just by moving the mouse. :(

------------------------------ "Nvidia, the Way It's Meant to be PAID Played! - Corrado
*Lesbian Lover Club* - founder Assman
Reply to Evilonigiri

LOL

------------------------------ AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ @ 3.5Ghz Stable l Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme l Asus Crosshair l 2GB Crosair XMS2 DHX PC2-6400 876MHz
l XFX GeForce 7900 GS (620,1000) l 250GB Seagate Barracuda l 250GB Maxtor l FSP Epsilon 600W l X-Fi XtremeGamer l Windows XP
Reply to Pro_AJ
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Overclocking > General Discussions > A weird problem I am having with my overclock
Go to:

There are 568 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them