Installed 8800gt but low 3d mark score

elite2005

Distinguished
May 27, 2006
68
0
18,630
hmm, thats wierd. Not really sure what can be bottlenecking me, and i think my processor is supposed to yield more points than yours ?
 

elite2005

Distinguished
May 27, 2006
68
0
18,630
i see, i ran like games and such and it was great especially crysis was running around 29-30 frames on high with dx10 tweaks. If i wanna update drivers to 164.4 beta, am i supposed to remove previous drivers first?
 

speedbird

Distinguished
Apr 19, 2007
547
0
18,990
My advice would be not to concern yourself too much with 3Dmark scores. Although 3Dmark is a nice benchmarking tool it does not tell the whole story and it's real game performance that counts not some synthetic benchmark. Play some real games to find out how your card really performs :)

My ATI 2900pro does not score to it's potential because of my 4400+ X2 holding back the score , but Bioshock and Crysis Demo play rather well so I'm not to bothered. To hell with 3Dmark! :D
 

Hatman

Distinguished
Aug 8, 2004
2,024
0
19,780



Its not going to magically work with everything except 3dmark06.

f it doesnt score as high as it should in 06 you are guna get bottlencecked in games.

OC the CPU like everyone else said.
 

kpo6969

Distinguished
May 6, 2007
1,144
0
19,290

If this helps the OP
My 8913 was 4958 with a 8600GT 620/1600
 


I've got 2 Dell boxes with the E6400 in them, both score 1840 on the cpu portion of 3d'06, if you're only scoring 1446, there's more to it than not being overclocked.
 

speedbird

Distinguished
Apr 19, 2007
547
0
18,990


My system powers through Bioshock, WIC and the Crysis demo without a problem with my lowly 4400+X2 and 2900pro. Real game performance is what counts at the end of the day not some 'I have a bigger e penis than you' synthetic benchmark. If 3Dmark was so accurate my 2900pro would be faster than the OP's 8800GT because my score was a tad higher, but it's pretty clear that the 8800GT is the better card in real games.Like I said it's an interesting benchmarking tool, but really shouldn't be taken too literally.




If the OP was a flight simulator X fan then I might agree with you, but the majority of games demand a decent CPU ofcourse (E6400 is decent), but more importantly really push GPU's to the limit.
 

neisonator

Distinguished
Oct 27, 2007
150
0
18,680
its just like takinging an exam compared to being judged on it in a real life situation 3dmark is only a test its not a real life situation
 

hell_spawn

Distinguished
Jan 20, 2005
133
0
18,680
cpu.....
I think it's your cpu
then again it could be your cpu
or... your cpu
but then again your cpu could be holding you back

I think we can see a trend here
Nvidas cards depend on cpu power to an extent so if you have a slower cpu your card will perform slower... thats just the way it is :)
 

elite2005

Distinguished
May 27, 2006
68
0
18,630
Wierd cus the e6400 still goes for like 200 retail to this day everywhere lol, I guess ill try to sell it for cheap and upgrade to a Q6600 for $279.
 

Ironnads

Distinguished
Sep 5, 2007
278
0
18,780
Just OC it up to 3 gighz.. Then you're lafin guvner. (even a better cooler's gonna cost u a sight less than a fresh 279$ q660o - plus who's gonna buy the 6400 for more thn 100$? I'd crank it up to 3gighz and then consider getting a phenom or Penrym (wait till the bennchies come out) in a few months - then u'l av a killer setup.
Copper danglies.