I've put together a new system and getting a 3Dmark06 of 12,615. I'm guessing I'll be able to get >13k when I OC some more (haven't touched GPU).
Looking at comparisons on futuremark, I've noticed that some "similar" systems are getting insane marks of 15k, 16k, 17k+. But on every one I've checked, they've each been running Directx 9.0c (I'm running 10) and using old Nvidia drivers (for example, 6.14.11.6902 vs my 7.15.11.6925).
Is either/both of these better for 3dmark?
Message edited by davidc on 02-04-2008 at 07:25:46 PM
If you are looking for benchmark numbers, stick with XP/DX9.
------------------------------Which Chip? Well, it depends on which set of thieving b@stardz you choose to support: The ones who use insider trading to enrich themselves while running their company into the ground, or the ones who illegally pay vendors to not support the first group.
Reply to Scotteq
I read an article in pczone or pcformat (can't remember which) a month or so ago from a games developer about testing Vista SP1 and XP SP3... he stated that at the time Vista SP1 gave a 2-3% increase in performance, while XP SP3 gave a 10% increase.. This would push XP even further ahead of Vista.. which is interesting..
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.