I know I want it to be either Western Digital or Seagate. (other brand suggestions welcome)
What I dont know is which one to choose. Not necessarily which brand but which 7200RPM 320G within either brand.
Let me explain myself. When I do a search in Newegg for a 7200RPM 320G HDD I get multiple options from either brand, all within ~$30 from each other. So how do I choose which one to buy other than using the compare tools or reading through the user comments?
All of them are 7200RPM. All of them are 320G. And all or most of them seem to have a 16MB Cache...whatever that means...but some are $10-$30 more...or less depending how you look at it.
I narrow the search down further to only include SATA drives in the results and still I get various results of same speed and capacity HDDs.
Seagate 5 year warranty.
Seagate 7200.11 500GB hard drive 32MB cache, faster than any of the 320GB HD's and not that much more expensive.
Western Digital, Samsung, an Hitachi with 32MB cache also fast, but only a 3 year warranty.
Currently nothing else is worth the money.
personally i would go for the 500gb as it's only 10 dollars more than the 320 version. plus it has twice the cach, 32mb. i've had this drive for 9 months now. and it's very quiet, stays cool and has zero problems.
personally i would go for the 500gb as it's only 10 dollars more than the 320 version. plus it has twice the cach, 32mb. i've had this drive for 9 months now. and it's very quiet, stays cool and has zero problems.
Thank you...this helped...I think I will settle for the 500GB. 180 more gigs for only $10 more is too good to pass up.
Hi, right now the best bet for a 320gb hdd is the samsung spinpoint F1 320gb or the Western Digital 320gb as they are both using a single platter for the full capacity. This means they are a good bit quicker than older drives and from personal experience with the samsungs are exceedingly quiet and cool running. That said the WD's newest are also reported to be excellent drives - samsungs are my personal favorties and have yet to get a bad drive in about 40 purchases.
Tech reports tested the 7200.11 (seagate 500 GB) and the WD5000KS (WD 500 GB) and they both performed pretty much the same, however WD has since released the WD5000AAKS which performs a little better, cooler and quieter than the KS, which made me choose WD vs seagate (sadly this was the only review I could find and can't say 100% sure the results are accurate).
Anyway, my vote goes to the WD5000AAKS.
------------------------------Upgrading sig...
35% Done
-------------------
Critical Error
Reply to SirCrono
I used Seagate in my current build because I got a good price. So far I've been really happy with them. I'm not sure the differences would even be noticable. They are both solid drives, but the longer warranty might be worth it.
Oh my Seagate gate drives came with Red SATA cables they were boxed though not OEM, so maybe that will help.
Of course on the other hand I've been building my own systems for over 10 years and have always used WD drives and I've never had one fail on me. So........
...glad I could help
------------------------------E8400 @ 3.8Ghz linked and synched with 2GB Corsair DDR3 @ 1700MHz/EGVA 790i Ultra/2 x 9600GT in SLI/2 x 500 GB Seagate HDD/Samsung 24" 2493HM/Antec 900
Reply to 1971Rhino
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.