Crysis Graphics

[starcraftfanatic]

Alas, my beloved 320MB GTS can't run both AA and high settings at the same time! So, uh, whats worth it more, AA (2x to 4x) or high/medium settings? shader quality also, how will that affect performance/ visuals?

 

[Alex The PC Gamer]

Alas, my beloved 320MB GTS can't run both AA and high settings at the same time! So, uh, whats worth it more, AA (2x to 4x) or high/medium settings? shader quality also, how will that affect performance/ visuals?

Higher settings by far.

 

[syfon]

Higher settings IMO.

 

[darkguset]

High settings on a high resolution on a monitor with a small dot pitch...
Almost no need for AA then... (almost.. **sighs** ...)

 

[decripple]

higher settings

 

[ganpachi]

Shaders, post processing and shadows are what gives crysis it's zazz. Ditch the AA and the AF and get those up as high as you can.

that said, I got a 320mb as well, and I know that you are not gunna hit high on shaders. Go all medium, bump up post processing to high and kick the water and volumetric effects to low.

 

[xx12amanxx]

Alas, my beloved 320MB GTS can't run both AA and high settings at the same time! So, uh, whats worth it more, AA (2x to 4x) or high/medium settings? shader quality also, how will that affect performance/ visuals?

Ditch the AA...though it look's great with both.

 

[pauldh]

what res? 10x7 no fsaa looks like crap IMO. But I am not using fsaa at 16x10 as I too have a 320MB GTS.

 

[starcraftfanatic]

so you can do this at 1920 x 1200...

http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i145/Soldier36/DSC02518.jpg

I wish, I am stuck at all medium except for possibly one thing at high that i choose at 16x10, and the frame rate drops to around 5 whenever i look at a big area (stupid VRAM)