Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > When is 4mb L2 necessary over 2mb of L2 cache?

When is 4mb L2 necessary over 2mb of L2 cache?

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - When is 4mb L2 necessary over 2mb of L2 cache?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!

Ask the community Add a reply

Bottom Search this thread

Hi,

This thread is related to http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] figuration

Should I spend an extra $100 for 4mb's of L2 rather than being happy with 2mb's of L2 on a laptop? This post IS NOT a duplicate posting, but specifically about L2 cache which was not able to be answered on the laptop forums.

Please read through that short thread above if you have any questions as they may have already been addressed.

Thanks in advance,
Shad

Add a reply

pretty sure cache dont matter that much

Message edited by itotallybelieveyou on 10-31-2007 at 11:41:46 PM

------------------------------ It's a theater of love stories.
Reply to itotallybelieveyou

That's what I just guess from reading this article that I just found: http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipse [...] i=2795&p=4

Reply to internationalist

Cache does not play a big role.
However, a very low FSB could play a big role.
If one laptop has a highe FSB it could be a big issue.

There were some tests comparing the E4300 vs the E6300.
The E4300 has a FSB of 800 vs 1066 for the E6300.
At Stock speeds, the E6300 was well ahead.

When both chips were OC'd to the same high speed and both had higher FSB speeds, they were about equal.

Once you get to 1066 FSB and beyond, FSB becomes less of an issue too.

Just something to watch for.
However, Most Laptops have a low FSB so there may not be much you can do.

Message quoted 1 times

Reply to zenmaster

zenmaster wrote :

A low FSB on a laptop is not necessarily a bad thing. The CPU idle speed is computed as 1.5x the FSB speed, so the lower the FSB speed, the lower the idle speed, and the longer and cooler it will run on battery. The newest 800 MHz FSB Core 2 Duos can drop their FSBs to 533 MHz from the full 800 during idle, so that will help you save some battery life as it drops the idle speed from 1200 MHz to 800 MHz.

But I'd not worry about a fast laptop CPU anyway. The HDD is by far and away the slowest thing in the machine unless you pay a grand for a 64 GB SSD. My laptop has a 1.067 GHz Core 2 Duo ULV U7500 with 2 MB L2 and a 533 MHz FSB and it is plenty fast for anything you'd want to use a portable notebook for. But even with a standard 2.5" SATA hard drive in it, the HDD is still the slowest thing in the machine.

------------------------------ Upcoming Overdue Build: Dual-socket workstation, ~32 GB DDR3, OS on a fast SSD, high-end GPU, all wrapped up in a huge tower case. Coming H2 2011.

Yes, I am actually still running the Pentium III 1.0B Coppermine in the picture.
Reply to MU_Engineer

If you overclock your CPU will be more hungry for data, in which case a larger cache will help. That's why you see smaller cache sizes on lower speed procs.

Reply to JonnyDough

Ask the community Add a reply

Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > When is 4mb L2 necessary over 2mb of L2 cache?

Go to:

Help |
Forum rules

There are 1108 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Page generated in 0.281 seconds

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel

Focus On

When is 4mb L2 necessary over 2mb of L2 cache?

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - When is 4mb L2 necessary over 2mb of L2 cache?

Please mind