ATI 3870 Benchmarks in VR-Zone Forums

http://forums.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?t=202510

Low temps, Low power, 7% less performance than 8800GT at stock settings ("In comparison, 3870 scored 11669 while 8800GT scored 12495"). Overclocked, beats a stock 8800GT (12961).
111 answers Last reply
More about 3870 benchmarks zone forums
  1. ..... man i just dont get amd/ati sometimes, why are making it seem as if they are moving into their next gen series of cards when in fact this is not next gen at all, its just a reboot of their current generation of cards. they could have easily called it the 2950 pro or something
  2. Looks good, though I doubt I'm going to be in the position to buy anything until after R700 comes out, so it's not the card for me...but I knew that, anyway.

    That makes the 3870 ATi's fastest card, right?
  3. Eviltwin17 said:
    ..... man i just dont get amd/ati sometimes, why are making it seem as if they are moving into their next gen series of cards when in fact this is not next gen at all, its just a reboot of their current generation of cards. they could have easily called it the 2950 pro or something


    The 3850 is a die-shrink of the 2900xt, and the 3870 is a new series GPU. It would be silly to call the new one a 2950.
  4. Hmm, bungholio marks, let's see some game benchmarks!
  5. Well I for one am a little disapointed in ATI.I expected something better than that from them.They have been sucking the hind titty for too long as it is.C'mon AMD/ATI,get with the program and bring out a card that will whop NVIDIAS butt.I might be a NVIDIA fan,but I like good healthy competition as well.Keep plugging away ATI,and stop letting everyone down with those inferior benchmarks.

    Dahak

    M2N32-SLI DELUXE WE
    X2 5600+ STOCK (2.8GHZ)
    2X1GIG DDR2 800 IN DC MODE
    TOUGHPOWER 850WATT PSU
    EVGA 7950 GX2 550/1400
    SMILIDON RAIDMAX GAMING CASE
    ACER 22IN WS LCD 1680X1050
    250GIG HD/320GIG HD
    G5 GAMING MOUSE
    WIN XP MCE SP2
  6. Yeah, 3dmarks don't hold much weight IMO. Sm3.0 score is good. Best news to me is the temps and noise levels. The 3850 is looking like what I want in my HTPC update.
  7. Hmm mixed card mode sounds cool. I like to see a CrossSLI of 8800 GT and 3850.
  8. "Hmm mixed card mode sounds cool. I like to see a CrossSLI of 8800 GT and 3850."


    Indeed, why can't they all just GET ALONG with each other,,, SLIfire - Crossli - AMDtel - whatever.
  9. Would it not be nice if they all got together like a happy family, they could then raise the prices! Then it would only be the consumer loosing money!
  10. The ATI cards have always done better in 3dmark06 then in real world apps though. On the other hand, I think 80nm to 55nm IS a significant improvement. Its solved the issues with the 2900xt, which was power consumption, heat, no need for what was kinda a high end cooler on it. No expensive 512mb bus doing next to nothing :D
  11. i still don't trust ati/amd these days....I'll wait for the real benchmarks...
  12. As pointed out on page 4, the 3DMark scores don't match on the OC'd picture (12961 vs. 12232). Something seems fishy.
  13. Hatman said:
    The ATI cards have always done better in 3dmark06 then in real world apps though.


    That's true this generation, last generation it was the reverse. And for the mid-range both have impressive bungholiomarks and weak gaming performance.
  14. NEXT GEN High End ATI GPU = R680!

    RV670 = A VALUE CARD hence the "V"
  15. Also I hope all of you see that that GPU-Z list 416 Shaders (not 320) and a Pixel Fillrate of 4.8GPixels/Texels. My Radeon 2900XT has 320 shaders and a 12.8GPixels/Texels Fillrate. So WTF?
  16. Eviltwin17 said:
    ..... man i just dont get amd/ati sometimes, why are making it seem as if they are moving into their next gen series of cards when in fact this is not next gen at all, its just a reboot of their current generation of cards.


    Yet, the HD3800 has a new level of DX and SM support, plus added features.
    Why shouldn't it get a refresh? This could be the X800Pro/X1800XL of that generation like the last two launches, with the superior high-end to launch later, remember it is an RVxxx part not an Rxxx part.

    Also how is this naming any more/less non-sensical/logical than nV having the GT beat the GTS; another GTS line, with the potential of a 3rd GTS line which might potentially dethrone the GTX; or naming the chip the GT is based on the G92 instead of the G8x without anymore of a major upgrade than the RV670? :heink:

    Neither company is making the naming easier, nor more sensible. It seems though that people have alot to say about it, even though they are unlikely to actually be confused so much as just want to complain about something. :pfff:
  17. wingless said:
    Also I hope all of you see that that GPU-Z list 416 Shaders (not 320) and a Pixel Fillrate of 4.8GPixels/Texels. My Radeon 2900XT has 320 shaders and a 12.8GPixels/Texels Fillrate. So WTF?


    GPU-Z hates new hardware, it say my Mobility HD2600 runs at 3mhz core 3 mhz memory (can you even run windows 95 let alone Vista at 60hz with that?).

    Although maybe it's right and that's why I'm getting such slow performance in Crysis. :whistle:

    When W1zzard updates it it should read them correctly then.
  18. Scores are pretty nice, and concidering ATI R600+ design is better at 3Dmarks, in games 3870 should be slower than GT on average ~15% or so. Pricing is very good, it seems we'll have 8600/2600 killer in hands. Much quieter cards also will be nice selling point too.

    If Inq is correct about 3870 X2 comming out before New Year, I might even look at it for possible upgrade ;)
  19. KyleSTL said:
    As pointed out on page 4, the 3DMark scores don't match on the OC'd picture (12961 vs. 12232). Something seems fishy.


    They would'nt need to match up in that screen shot. When doing repeated tests in 3DMark06, the scores are only posted to the program window when the Pop-Up Score window is closed. The simple explanation for that is that they had run a previous test at some lower OC and thus the score in the program box is lower due to it being from the previous test (possibly at a lower clock I would assume). The Pop-Up window score is from the most recent test and will update to the program box when it is closed. They did this to allow full comparison of scores wen testing hardware/software changes. Hense, you can see where the improvement lies, whether it be in SM3/SM2 or CPU.
  20. So the 3870, released over a year after the 8800GTX, still cant compete with the 8800GTX.

    :/
  21. TheGreatGrapeApe said:
    That's true this generation, last generation it was the reverse. And for the mid-range both have impressive bungholiomarks and weak gaming performance.


    Was just reffering to this gen :)


    darkstar78:

    £300 vs £150>???


    Should be pretty obvious. Wait for the ATI dual card and then see how it matches the GTX.
  22. good old ATI when they used to rule!
  23. Well, I passed on a 8800GT for ~$240 out the door at fry's on release date to wait for the 3870. :( You win some you loose some. Now I hope for prices in the low $200s for this card. If not then I win some lose most.
  24. Actually, I am willing to trade off a few FPS if the 3870 runs cooler and quieter than the 8800GT (which I have read cranks out a lot of heat and noise), and sells for the same price. It looks like the 3870 has some good overclocking potential, and things will only get better as the drivers mature. It might not be a grand slam for ATI, but I think it will keep them in the game and hopefully offers a viable alternative to the 8800GT at a similar price point.
  25. what a bad move by amdti
  26. What is the expected price for these cards? Anyone know?
  27. Supposedly:

    3850: ~$150
    3870: ~$250
  28. Yeah, just how the 8800GT was "supposed" to be $200-$250. We'll see.
  29. aadamszc said:
    Supposedly:

    3850: ~$150
    3870: ~$250



    Aww. Well, if the card runs close to the 8800GT in real game performance, the 3870 might be worth it. Otherwise I don't think I'll be paying 20 bucks less for a less powerful card. Rather drop the 270 for the 8800. Makes me sad. I was really hoping ATI would have a powerplay up their sleeve, or at least be tight in comparison testing. I can always hope that the benchies on the 15th will tell a different story.
  30. Hopefully AMD has a real winner with R700. If nothing else this may help drive the price of the 8800GT down.
  31. ettenra said:
    Aww. Well, if the card runs close to the 8800GT in real game performance, the 3870 might be worth it. Otherwise I don't think I'll be paying 20 bucks less for a less powerful card. Rather drop the 270 for the 8800. Makes me sad. I was really hoping ATI would have a powerplay up their sleeve, or at least be tight in comparison testing. I can always hope that the benchies on the 15th will tell a different story.

    Its because Nvidia can OC the shader clock, while ATI can't.
  32. i got my eVGA 8800GT Superclocked for $249....I am waiting to feel some regret once the ATI card comes out...but I really don't think I will...even if prices are lower.
  33. qmalik said:
    i got my eVGA 8800GT Superclocked for $249....I am waiting to feel some regret once the ATI card comes out...but I really don't think I will...even if prices are lower.


    oh god know you will.regrdless of the oc poitential, looks like it s going to be not a good value only for the performance. if it s cool and quiet, probably it s clearly gonna end up being as being a better deal than the g92. this is the kind of card a lot of people are going to be ready to pay for. and between me and you(:)), you wont even mind how much better or worse it will look once you ll be playing the games you like.
  34. darkstar782 said:
    So the 3870, released over a year after the 8800GTX, still cant compete with the 8800GTX.

    :/

    This should:
    http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2007/11/09/inq-reveals-r680-radeon-hd-3870
  35. The mixed 3870/3850 crossfire results weren't bad at all (bottom of page 4). Adding the 3850 made it jump 3,000 3dmarks.

    Here are some other slides that may have been posted already.
    http://we.pcinlife.com/thread-844605-1-1.html

    I'm looking forward to some real reviews late next week.
  36. Holy benchmarks batman! There's a lot of comparison going on there. On checking the 3870 numbers vs. the 8800gt numbers in the same games, they are similar. Except in World in Conflict. GT wins there by a landslide.
  37. But of course, not wise to get over-excited about some slides. In a week we should have some real reviews to go by.
  38. So when is the final release date for the ATI 3800 series card? 15th of november or the 19th, or neither of them????
  39. SHould be reviews and cards available on Nov. 15th from what I've heard. I'm not liking buy.com's prices of $218 and $269 though. :(

    http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4121&Itemid=1
  40. I read that the 3850 will be much cheaper, but let's wait a few days to see the official info.

    A nice thing is that you can do crossfire with the cheaper card and have a good performance boost.
  41. itotallybelieveyou said:
    what a bad move by amdti


    Actually, I kind of like it. It's pretty smart of AMD to focus on the mainstream, that's where the big money is.
  42. aevm said:
    Actually, I kind of like it. It's pretty smart of AMD to focus on the mainstream, that's where the big money is.


    Well, I politely disagree with you on this one. There's this thing called the halo effect and it's a pretty powerful thing... just ask Apple how it's enjoying the halo effect from the success it's had with the iPod. That said... the 8800 GTX casts a long shadow over the video card market... many people will be thinking "Hey, if Nvidia makes the best top-end card they must make the best cards" It's not a "smart" move by AMD to focus on the mainstream... it's pretty much their only option considering they haven't been able to compete with the top offerings from Nvidia. I agree that mainstream cards are where the real money is at (not because of ASPs but rather the high volume) but not being able to compete at the top will seriously make people wonder if they're able to compete at all. Now with the 8800 GT it just seems like Nvidia has solidified its hold on the market and given us that "mainstream" card we've all been craving (sorry 8600s... you're not it) Best of luck to AMD/ATI... it's going to need it.
  43. Yup, good points. I hope they get back in shape soon so they can compete at the high-end too, that'd be good for everybody. Hmmm, with AMD at $12/share maybe I should buy some :)
  44. If the card was 209$ (3870) and the performance was as reported, I'd be all over it. But unless it's a 50$ savings and a less than 15% performance loss across the board in real gaming compared to the 8800, I just can't justify it, no matter how bad I want ATI to pull out a win this round. I think a lot of homebuilders feel that way too. They've already invested in decent PSU's for last gen power hogs. A great power savings isn't going to be a huge deal for them, so that can't be the reason they want to buy the 38xx's. It just won't motivate.
  45. Looking at their other prices it doesn't seem they have the best deals. Wasn't the 8800 in the higher 300's? lol. I hope newegg has the 3850 around 160-175/3870 around 200-220. I may buy one.
  46. You see guys, the problem with synthetic benchmarks is that they are not real.
  47. Can Not said:
    You see guys, the problem with synthetic benchmarks is that they are not real.



    Eh.. Yeah. I for one REALLY want to see some 3870 real game performance marks, and a comparison against the 8800gt, the old gts cards, the 2900xt, and the 3850. :pt1cable:
  48. True, you can't use 3dmark when comparing different companies.

    I seriously hope this is priced aggressively, that way I can get my friend to buy one. Meh, waiting games...
  49. Everybody seems to be forgetting that we are going to see an R680 by the end of the year! The RV670 is just a value card and is not meant to be ATI's top-liner. "V" is for value and thats exactly what it will be when it comes out. AMD has gotten into the bad habit of releasing the low-end products first before the top of the line hardware is ready. This is giving the illusion that they downright suck and that is reflected in their stock price. The market has spoken.

    The R680 will be the REAL DEAL and its expected to ship by Christmas so keep an eye out for that. If not, we'll at least have the HD3870 X2 to check out. 640 shaders and 32 ROPS for $400 can't be screwed up hopefully LOL (....until we get that beta-assed driver release).
Ask a new question

Read More

Graphics Cards Performance Power ATI Graphics