Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Q6600 and Ultra-120 Extreme. Temps too good to be true?

Q6600 and Ultra-120 Extreme. Temps too good to be true?

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - Q6600 and Ultra-120 Extreme. Temps too good to be true?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Just built a new system with a Q6600 with G0 stepping and a Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme.

Right now I have ambient temps around 20C (68f) and the Abit uGuru app says the processor is at 26C and the system is 28C. This is with the case closed up and the front cover of an Antec P182 closed. I did add a fan to the front intake though.

When I had the case open I was getting temps around 18C-20C. At time the ambient temps were around the same. I put my hand on the heatsink and it was stone cold. No heat whatsoever.

I'd really like to think that it's possible to get low temps like this with only air cooling, that heatsink is a monster, but I'm skeptical. I didn't think it was possible to get close to ambient temps with air cooling.

What I really think is the temp sensor for the processor needs an adjustment. Is it possible to do so?
Are there different means to double check the accuracy?
Maybe I just happen to have a magic heatsink that defies the laws of physics. Perhaps with the correct clock speed I can also travel back in time. That would be cool.


What say you?


EDIT: everything is at stock speeds for now.


Message edited by Flingpoo on 11-05-2007 at 03:28:49 AM
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Theres a couple of things to do first...

Try Speedfan and intel's TAT for cpu temp measurements.
and then try a full load temp... ie running 4 instances of prime95 to get a temp.

I also find it hard to believe your q6600 is running at ambient temperature when idle. i would expect with a thermalright ~25-35 idle

Reply to chookman

Wasn't there something a while back about some Q6600 w/ G0 steppings would misread temps by -10? (i.e. temp is 35c, sensor says 25c) I may be completely wrong, but for some reason it sounds like I heard it before.

Reply to monsterrocks

I actually find that every program I use to determine my temp is different so I just kind of average them out. 26C is low but it likely not more than a few degrees off. For instance right now Everest lists my temps at 42C, SiSoft Sandra lists it at 32C and Speedfan lists it at 37C, that's idle with my E6300 at 1.38v FSB1600 for a speed of 2.8Ghz and a Ultra 120 Extreme.


Message edited by ausch30 on 11-05-2007 at 04:52:56 AM
------------------------------
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
-Aristotle
Reply to ausch30

Right now my AMD X2 5200 oc'd to 3.1Ghz w/Ultra 120 Extreme is idle at 26 deg C (79 deg F)

Ambient temp in the room is right now 74 deg F

Stock temps at 2.6 Ghz are at 18-21 deg C which is exactly ambient temp.

It is possible, since I've checked with SpeedFan, Everest and nVidia Monitor.

Reply to tb28w3

Flingpoo, you can Calibrate your temps by using the following Sticky - Core 2 Quad and Duo Temperature Guide: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] ture-guide

Comp :sol:

Reply to CompuTronix

CompuTronix wrote :

Flingpoo, you can Calibrate your temps by using the following Sticky - Core 2 Quad and Duo Temperature Guide: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] ture-guide

Comp :sol:


Wow! Excellant sticky.
It looks a bit involved. Apparently I have a bit of a learning curve to get over first. Half way through I got a little drool on my keyboard. ;)
I'll give it another shot tomorrow. It's getting late here and my level of comprehension is low.

I was also reading grayskys sticky: How to Overclock C2Q (Quads) and C2D (Duals) - A Guide v1.3
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] uals-guide

In the software section he suggested that the temp monitoring utility that came with his Asus mobo lacked the ability to read multi core temps. I wonder if the same would be true with Abit's uGuru. He suggested using "Core Temp" or "Speed fan" also mentioned in your (CompuTronix) sticky.


What would be the pros and cons of calibrating the software compared to calibrating the actual temp sensor?

Reply to Flingpoo

Sensors can not be calibrated. The Digital Thermal Sensors (DTS) within each Core (Tjunction) are factory calibrated, and the CPU sensor (Tcase) is BIOS calibrated. SpeedFan is one of the only utilities which allows offset corrections to be configured.


Message edited by CompuTronix on 11-05-2007 at 05:58:10 AM
Reply to CompuTronix

The short answer to " Calibrating the actual temp sensor" is no.

Slightly longer answer. To calibrate the sensor you must first know the temperature which means placing the Processor (Unpowered) in a controlled enviroment (ie Temp controlled oven) after a suitable time to reach equilibrium then take a reading. This would be repeated for various temps. From this you would develop a polynomial equation which can be used by software. Could also develop a "Look up table" -

Edited
Computronix - I see you responded while I was typing


Message edited by RetiredChief on 11-05-2007 at 06:22:00 AM
Reply to RetiredChief
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Q6600 and Ultra-120 Extreme. Temps too good to be true?
Go to:

There are 1347 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them