So I'm looking to build my first gaming pc, but I'm on a very strict 700 dollar budget. Obviously, one of the biggest decisions in my build is amd vs intel.
So I have two builds, both of which are identical, all except for the cpu and motherboard. The first uses the amd phenom ii x4 965 BE, and the second uses the i5 2400. The intel build stretches my budget, putting me 40 dollars over, not including tax, which I'm sure will put me up to 100 dollars over. The amd build is much more reasonably priced for me and is even a little under my preferred budget range, so naturally that appeals to me.
My main question is, will the 2400 give me better fps under full load (im thinking a game, fraps, and skype up, and maybe some browser tabs) than the 965 BE? If so, will it be enough of an increase to justify spending an additional 80-90 bucks, or not?
So I have two builds, both of which are identical, all except for the cpu and motherboard. The first uses the amd phenom ii x4 965 BE, and the second uses the i5 2400. The intel build stretches my budget, putting me 40 dollars over, not including tax, which I'm sure will put me up to 100 dollars over. The amd build is much more reasonably priced for me and is even a little under my preferred budget range, so naturally that appeals to me.
My main question is, will the 2400 give me better fps under full load (im thinking a game, fraps, and skype up, and maybe some browser tabs) than the 965 BE? If so, will it be enough of an increase to justify spending an additional 80-90 bucks, or not?