Bob Miller is a coward

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

What else would explain why he will not respond to my posts?
Bob, you know that my Sony HD-200 and LG 3200a receivers do
an excellent job at receiving ota signals. Why do you refuse
to acknowledge this fact?

Chip

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

"Charles Tomaras" <tomaras@tomaras.com> wrote:
> <cjdaytonjrnospam@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:20050504123824.083$uz@newsreader.com...
> > What else would explain why he will not respond to my posts?
> > Bob, you know that my Sony HD-200 and LG 3200a receivers do
> > an excellent job at receiving ota signals. Why do you refuse
> > to acknowledge this fact?
>
> Why don't you take this up with Bob and leave the rest of the readers out
> of it. My two cents...this newsgroup is far better with more views and
> more opinions and much worse with name the kind of childish names and
> calling out that you are exhibiting. Any psychologist will tell you that
> the best way to deal with people who call others names and behave
> childishly is to ignore them. Apparently that is exactly what Bob is
> doing in your case. He didn't take the bait..

First of all, if you believe I should take this up off of the group,
why did you respond in the group? Hmmm.....

Secondly, I have only referred to Bob this way once or twice, after
he has repeated his lies and distortions and then refused to respond
to my calling him on it. Therefore, I do not feel like I am going too
far with this. Not that it is any of your business...
Chip

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

<cjdaytonjrnospam@cox.net> wrote in message
news:20050504135553.431$Bq@newsreader.com...
> "Charles Tomaras" <tomaras@tomaras.com> wrote:
>> <cjdaytonjrnospam@cox.net> wrote in message
>> news:20050504123824.083$uz@newsreader.com...
>> > What else would explain why he will not respond to my posts?
>> > Bob, you know that my Sony HD-200 and LG 3200a receivers do
>> > an excellent job at receiving ota signals. Why do you refuse
>> > to acknowledge this fact?
>>
>> Why don't you take this up with Bob and leave the rest of the readers out
>> of it. My two cents...this newsgroup is far better with more views and
>> more opinions and much worse with name the kind of childish names and
>> calling out that you are exhibiting. Any psychologist will tell you that
>> the best way to deal with people who call others names and behave
>> childishly is to ignore them. Apparently that is exactly what Bob is
>> doing in your case. He didn't take the bait..
>
> First of all, if you believe I should take this up off of the group,
> why did you respond in the group? Hmmm.....

I suppose I responded on the group as a public admonishment of your
childishness.


>
> Secondly, I have only referred to Bob this way once or twice, after
> he has repeated his lies and distortions and then refused to respond
> to my calling him on it. Therefore, I do not feel like I am going too
> far with this. Not that it is any of your business...
> Chip


What happens on this newsgroup is as much my business as it is yours.

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

cjdaytonjrnospam@cox.net wrote in
news:20050504123824.083$uz@newsreader.com...

> What else would explain why he will not respond to my posts?
> Bob, you know that my Sony HD-200 and LG 3200a receivers do
> an excellent job at receiving ota signals. Why do you refuse
> to acknowledge this fact?

and some kids slept w/ Michael Jackson and he never molested them. I'm
not sure what your point is?

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

On 04 May 2005 16:38:24 GMT, cjdaytonjrnospam@cox.net wrote:

>What else would explain why he will not respond to my posts?
>Bob, you know that my Sony HD-200 and LG 3200a receivers do
>an excellent job at receiving ota signals. Why do you refuse
>to acknowledge this fact?
>
>Chip

Why should he respond to you when your mind is made up based on purely
anecdotal evidence? The fact that you state that you get good
reception with your setup doesn't seem to mean a whole lot in the
scheme of things. For every post claiming good reception, I can show
you just as many claiming poor reception.

Thus having said, I believe that Bob should congratulate you on your
good fortune and then this argument will end.........won't it?

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

admin <admin.1osxzh@no-mx.hdtv-info.org> wrote:
> Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean he's a coward.

That's true, of course. But when they make claims that are simply not correct,
in my opinion, and then REFUSE to discuss them, I think that makes them a coward.

Chip

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service $9.95/Month 30GB