AMD 3200 ---> X2 4200 = slow performance
Tags:
Last response: in CPUs
Hi, I have installed a 939 AMD 4200 Dual Core Manchester on my Abit UL8 motherboard. Since then, I experienced slow performance in every game I play. I have an AGP 7600GT, 2gig RAM and a generic 450 watts power supply. I have installed AMD Dual Core Optimizer but nothing help. I've tried many nVidia driver but the performance is still low. I've reinstalled my old single core 3200+ on my motherboard and everything seem to be back to normal.
I wonder why do I have problem after installing a dual core on my system. Is it because I need a better power supply? a better cpu fan (I feel a big difference, 38 degree on idle with the 3200+ and 51 degree on idle with X2 4200). I have a limited budget I can't take a risk of wasting money.
I wonder why do I have problem after installing a dual core on my system. Is it because I need a better power supply? a better cpu fan (I feel a big difference, 38 degree on idle with the 3200+ and 51 degree on idle with X2 4200). I have a limited budget I can't take a risk of wasting money.
More about : amd 3200 4200 slow performance
go into task manager and assign the game process to a single core. Ive noticed that this really is a problem with AMD dual core chips (specifically in games using the quake III engine).
Doing this in jedi academy resulted in 2-3x increase in frame rates.
EDIT: and the 7600gt is not a crappy card...it was a sweet midrange card not too long ago.
Doing this in jedi academy resulted in 2-3x increase in frame rates.
EDIT: and the 7600gt is not a crappy card...it was a sweet midrange card not too long ago.
Related ressources
- AMD 64 3200 + or X2 4200 ? - Forum
- Acer e360 amd athlon 64 x2 4200 + 2.2 ghz - Forum
- AMD 780G 's Radeon HD 3200 performance - Forum
- 3200 + to a 4000+ or 4200 + X2 - Forum
- Athlon 64 X2 4200 +, how capable of a CPU? - Forum
Are both cores displaying in task manager?
Do both cores display in your hardware profile?
Does your BIOS correctly set the buss speed and multiplier for the X2 so that it is running the correct speed?
There is no way the X2 will give slower performance, no way, no how, it ain't happening, unless it is not installing and configuring correctly.
Do not spend money on a power supply, this is not the problem in this case.
Quick edit here:
I did some checking and your motherboard may NOT support dual core CPU's without a BIOS update.
Do both cores display in your hardware profile?
Does your BIOS correctly set the buss speed and multiplier for the X2 so that it is running the correct speed?
There is no way the X2 will give slower performance, no way, no how, it ain't happening, unless it is not installing and configuring correctly.
Do not spend money on a power supply, this is not the problem in this case.
Quick edit here:
I did some checking and your motherboard may NOT support dual core CPU's without a BIOS update.
I will check this in a few hour and come back with an answer.
BTW what should be the bus speed and multiplier for a X2 dual core? Now I remember having slow performance on my old pentium 4 2.8ghz when running on win98 to play old games (I had dual boot system at that time) and I had to downclock the speed.
My dual core is a X2 4200 939, 2.2GHz. What setting should it be? I think the bus speed is 800 and mutiplier 200
BTW what should be the bus speed and multiplier for a X2 dual core? Now I remember having slow performance on my old pentium 4 2.8ghz when running on win98 to play old games (I had dual boot system at that time) and I had to downclock the speed.
My dual core is a X2 4200 939, 2.2GHz. What setting should it be? I think the bus speed is 800 and mutiplier 200
you installed a dual core chip into a system that thinks there is 1 CPU
your computer knows the Dual core is there but I would be willing to bet that windows does not have a clue ....
do some google work and find out how to install the windows drivers er something - I'd be willing to bet that someone here knows the process already
your computer knows the Dual core is there but I would be willing to bet that windows does not have a clue ....
do some google work and find out how to install the windows drivers er something - I'd be willing to bet that someone here knows the process already
thank you guy for all the reply
reinstalling windows seems to be the safest solution I will try it
my full spec is
abit uli8
amd 4200 dual core 939
2gig ram DDR
hard disk ide 120gig
hard disk sata 120 gig
pioneer r-111 dvd-rw
geforce 7600gt 256mb DDR3 agp
generic power supply 450 watts
coolermaster extreme vortex cpu fan
artic silver thermal paste
reinstalling windows seems to be the safest solution I will try itmy full spec is
abit uli8
amd 4200 dual core 939
2gig ram DDR
hard disk ide 120gig
hard disk sata 120 gig
pioneer r-111 dvd-rw
geforce 7600gt 256mb DDR3 agp
generic power supply 450 watts
coolermaster extreme vortex cpu fan
artic silver thermal paste
mike99 said:
You do NOT need to re-install windows!, I didn't, and I went from 3700 to x2 4200. You DO need to apply AMD patch for dual core and the microsoft one. Google is your friend. You do need a better CPU cooler as 4200 uses more power than your old CPU.Mike.
I installed both patch. None of them fixed my problem. Seems to be related to something else, maybe hardware.
are you running the latest bios for your board? Maybe there was a fix. if you check in the task manager does it look like your bogged? maybe something is messing up and taking all the cpu power from you....
I know that Creative Audigy's software was verrrry slow and lagged even windows explorer(i am picky....it was only a half a second of lag, but well....you know pissed me off) on a dual core system until the software was patched to one core....
I know that Creative Audigy's software was verrrry slow and lagged even windows explorer(i am picky....it was only a half a second of lag, but well....you know pissed me off) on a dual core system until the software was patched to one core....
To the moron above: AMD doesn't suck, you do. Grow up. These forums are here to help people.
To the point at hand. I forgot to mention that your board may be on the older side and in need of a bios update that one of the other posters recommended.
Probably all you need. No reason to re-format because it still won't work if the right bios isn't in it.
To the point at hand. I forgot to mention that your board may be on the older side and in need of a bios update that one of the other posters recommended.
Probably all you need. No reason to re-format because it still won't work if the right bios isn't in it.
swifty_morgan said:
To the moron above: AMD doesn't suck, you do. Grow up. These forums are here to help people. To the point at hand. I forgot to mention that your board may be on the older side and in need of a bios update that one of the other posters recommended.
Probably all you need. No reason to re-format because it still won't work if the right bios isn't in it.
I have reinstalled window and the performance are still low
I will do as you said : update bios
stevechong25 said:
I have reinstalled window and the performance are still low
I will do as you said : update bios
There is a good chance that it should fix your problem. A lot of s939 boards would only support x2 with a bios update. Flash your bios, then see how it works. I Heard of someone who uninstalled the AMD driver and his system actually worked better, dunno its worth a try.
Did you check to see if cool & quiet is on? Or that the voltage going to the cpu is correct? Did you make sure your ram timings didnt change or anything like that?
When I looked at Universal aBit S.E.A's website, http://www.abit.com.tw/page/sa/download/download_bios_detail.php?pFILE_TYPE=Bios&pMAIN_TYPE=Motherboard&pTITLE_ON_SCREEN=UL8&pSOCKET_TYPE=Socket%20939, you might want to download two (2) bios files and do 2 bios flashing. furthermore, only certain ULi chipset that can give you comparable performance to better chipsets (nForce 4 series etc)...God luck in flashing
ok, I have updated the bios to the latest version but no improvement so far. Instead of displaying 2.21ghz it display 2.25ghz. The games performance are still horrible.
I decided to modify the multiplier and the bus speed. Instead of letting them to Default and Startup setting, I changed the multiplier to X11 2200MHz and the bus to 200MHz. Now my computer display 2.21ghz.
I tried a few games and noticed a small improvement in performance. Perhaps I should play with the bios setting until I get good performance.
I decided to modify the multiplier and the bus speed. Instead of letting them to Default and Startup setting, I changed the multiplier to X11 2200MHz and the bus to 200MHz. Now my computer display 2.21ghz.
I tried a few games and noticed a small improvement in performance. Perhaps I should play with the bios setting until I get good performance.
If your system is slow only when playing games, the problem might be the AGP driver. Uninstall the video driver then the AGP driver, then re-install the AGP driver first. You can get the ULI AGP driver from the NVidia website. Maybe the problem has something to do with the AMD memory controller being integrated into CPU and it's affecting the AGP bus / driver.
Well, having 2 crap brand memory sticks don't help anything. Having said that, my ddr 3200/400 runs at 433.
Try running it at 216 for starters. Bump it up til it crashes then back off.......... or increase the voltage a little and start over
better off starting at 201 then 202, etc. Cheap memory might not run at 216..... ?
Try running it at 216 for starters. Bump it up til it crashes then back off.......... or increase the voltage a little and start over
better off starting at 201 then 202, etc. Cheap memory might not run at 216..... ?
monst0r said:
you need to reinstall windows if you change the amount of cores in a PC...like others said windows still thinks that your PC only has 1 core, so its amazing its still working...try reinstalling windows or googling a way to patch your installation...thats your problem right there
Nope. I replaced my 3000+ with a 4400+ and installed the AMD dual core drivers and everything worked fine. My bios was already updated.
To the OP: Your problem is that your mobo's ULi M1689 chipset (from the info I've found so far) doesn't support the x2 processors. The only option I can see is getting a new mobo. I just ran into this problem with a friend's PC I was upgrading for him. He had a Jetway with a via chipset that didn't support the x2, I didn't even think to check this out before but I realized it when I booted that thing. It was the same story, slow performance and only showed one graph in task manager. After I did some research and found out the problem, tried installing updated bios, nothing worked. We just had to get a new board.
Anyway, choices are limited for boards with an AGP slot and support for x2. Newegg has none. Tiger direct has an MSI with a VIA K8T800Pro for $50 that will work. There are some others out there, I think Zipzoomfly has one or two. Ebay is full of ECS and Asus boards with the VIA chip that will work for cheap, but some people don't feel comfortable buying such items from ebay. If you don't want to buy another video card I think that VIA is the only option if I remember right. You would be better off getting a board with a PCI-E slot and another cheap card IMO. There's lots of cheap ones with NF-4 chips that perform better and you could get something faster than that 7600 for very little. Hope this helps!
Hit ctrl-alt-delete at the same time to bring up the task manager.
Click on ther "performance" tab.
If the X2 is being correctly identified, you will see 2 CPU usage graphs. 1 for each core.
Go to your Control Panel, System, Hardware, Device Manager, Processor. Again, if the X2 is being detected correctly, you will have 2 CPU's listed.
If you only have 1 CPU graph in the device manager, or 1 CPU listed in your device manager, your X2 is NOT being detected correctly. It is, in your case, most likely your motherboard not being dual core compatable.
When you installed the new CPU, upon the first boot-up into Windows, Windows should have detected the new CPU, installed it, (it was loading the multi-processor kernel and drivers) and asked you to re-boot to complete the installation. Did that happen?
Click on ther "performance" tab.
If the X2 is being correctly identified, you will see 2 CPU usage graphs. 1 for each core.
Go to your Control Panel, System, Hardware, Device Manager, Processor. Again, if the X2 is being detected correctly, you will have 2 CPU's listed.
If you only have 1 CPU graph in the device manager, or 1 CPU listed in your device manager, your X2 is NOT being detected correctly. It is, in your case, most likely your motherboard not being dual core compatable.
When you installed the new CPU, upon the first boot-up into Windows, Windows should have detected the new CPU, installed it, (it was loading the multi-processor kernel and drivers) and asked you to re-boot to complete the installation. Did that happen?
rickzor said:
I know his problem is solved, but i just wanted to flame a bit about some comments on the previous page.The 7600GT is not a crappy card.
And amd doesnt suck.
Period.
The 7600gt plays Crysis and COD4 just fine in 1280x1024 with a stock E4300, 2gb DDR2 533, and a lowly VIA MB all running on XP SP1!.
tlmck said:
The 7600gt plays Crysis and COD4 just fine in 1280x1024 with a stock E4300, 2gb DDR2 533, and a lowly VIA MB all running on XP SP1!.That said, there is nothing to add.
Although that "AMD sucks" comment was either childish and only meant to provoque people, or just purely ignorant.
Just because intel has better cpus, it doesnt mean that amd sucks, but thats just me and my homble opinion.
the nvidia 7600gt card performs on pair with a 7800gs (my card, a little oced anyway), and it still does the job pretty well.
Even with a old A64 3500+ (oced too) moving the horses :0 underneath.
Guys... God are you guys just random and silly with some of these suggestions... Reinstall Windows? Get real. The AMD dual core optimizer and X2 drivers are all you need. The graphics card is bad? He had the same card before and now he has worse performance, so that's not it genius. It's definately not the power supply unless he's getting some bluescreens of death or some other issues (which he's not). Your PS is more than sufficient for your system. A power supply failure is usually accompanied by A) The smell of freshly baked silicon or B) a component not working correctly and you get the bluescreen o' death or C) Won't power on at all.
I don't know what you problem is specifically. I would say that it might be a mobo issue or maybe a bad CPU? Don't know. I will say that back in the day when I upgraded from an Athlon 2000+ to a X2 3800, I didn't notice a really huge jump in performance. Your old single core was clocked at 2.0Ghz, but actually ran at an effective 3.2ghz compared with a Pentiac 4 at 3.2 ghz. The newer numbering system on the AMD chips is reflective of the actual clock speed times 2 (in the neighborhood at least), so your effective clock speed has slowed by 1 Ghz when running single-threaded apps and games. You might want to try a game that is known to have been optimized for dual core systems like HL2: Episode One or some of the newer games then do a CPU comparison and see if it's still dogging. If it does, my opinion is a Mobo or bad CPU situation.
I don't know what you problem is specifically. I would say that it might be a mobo issue or maybe a bad CPU? Don't know. I will say that back in the day when I upgraded from an Athlon 2000+ to a X2 3800, I didn't notice a really huge jump in performance. Your old single core was clocked at 2.0Ghz, but actually ran at an effective 3.2ghz compared with a Pentiac 4 at 3.2 ghz. The newer numbering system on the AMD chips is reflective of the actual clock speed times 2 (in the neighborhood at least), so your effective clock speed has slowed by 1 Ghz when running single-threaded apps and games. You might want to try a game that is known to have been optimized for dual core systems like HL2: Episode One or some of the newer games then do a CPU comparison and see if it's still dogging. If it does, my opinion is a Mobo or bad CPU situation.
Related ressources:
- ForumAMD 64 X2 4200 +
- ForumAMD Athlon 64 X2 4200 (Windsor) Socket AM2 (940)
- ForumUpgrading From AMD 3200 to AMD X2 4200 , Fan?
- ForumComputer crashes after installing AMD 64 X2 4200 s.939
- ForumAMD Athlon XP 3200 Ebay price vs X2 4200 online price
- ForumAMD 64 X2 4200
- ForumAthlon 64 X2 4200 + under performing
- ForumNeed Help with selecting a board for an AMD dual core 4200 .
- ForumUpgraded from 3200 + to dual 4200 +...problem?
- ForumAMD 4000 or X2 Model
- Forumnew dual core x2 from AMD ?
- ForumUpgrade from Athlon X2 4200 +
- ForumOverclocked Athlon X2 4200 Doesnt seem to be running as fast as it Sho
- ForumS939 X2 Toledo 4200 + vs. S939 X2 Manchester 4200 +
- Forum212 evo fan replacement
- More resources
!
I have fixed the problem by installing the Uli driver on nvidia website. I cant believe I have passed by all that trouble